{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":17,"sheets":["About","Dashboard Graphics","Dashboard","Attributes (T1)","Likes (P1,1)","Values Checklist (T2)","Key Values (T3)","Benefits (T4)","Negatives (T5)","Threats (T6)","Worst threat (T7)","Scorecard (T8)","Responses","ConditTrend (T9)","Recomm (T10)","Str & Challenges (T11)","GEF METT"],"not_rendered":{"charts":10,"images":10,"macros":1,"external_links":2,"defined_names":0,"comments":20,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"About","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[16,1,16,2],[16,3,16,4],[17,1,17,2],[17,3,17,4],[18,1,18,2],[18,3,18,4]]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C3","v":0}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Country",null,"Papua New Guinea"]
[null,"Protected Area"]
[null,"Year"]

{"sheet":"Dashboard Graphics","index":1,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":26,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B113","v":"METT Category"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C113","v":"% Weighted Score"}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B114","v":"Planning"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C114","v":15.151515151515152}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B115","v":"Input"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C115","v":2.5}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B116","v":"Process"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C116","v":24.219345011424217}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B117","v":"Output"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C117","v":29.6875}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B118","v":"Outcome"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C118","v":25}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B119","v":"Governance"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C119","v":35.2112676056338}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B120","v":"TOTAL"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C120","v":21.58505154639175}]

{"sheet":"Dashboard","index":2,"n_rows":134,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":134,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Category","Issue","Possible Score","Score","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted Score",null,null,"Categories for reporting"]
["Planning","1. Legal status",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J3","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","2. PA objectives ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J4","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","3. PA regulations or customary laws/rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F5","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J5","v":2},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G6","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F6","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I6","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J6","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G7","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F7","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I7","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J7","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G8","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F8","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I8","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J8","v":0.25},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J9","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4a. Land & water planning for habitat conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G10","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I10","v":1.2000000000000002},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J10","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4b. Land & water planning for connectivity",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G11","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I11","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J11","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G12","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I12","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J12","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","5. PA design",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J13","v":3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6a. On ground boundary marking of PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G14","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I14","v":0.89999999999999991},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J14","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6b. Map of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G15","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F15","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I15","v":0.4},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J15","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G16","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F16","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I16","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J16","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the PA ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G17","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F17","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I17","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J17","v":1},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G18","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F18","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I18","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J18","v":1},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G19","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F19","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I19","v":1.2000000000000002},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J19","v":0.4},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G20","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F20","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I20","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J20","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G21","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F21","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I21","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J21","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","7. Management planning",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J22","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J23","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J24","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G25","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F25","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I25","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J25","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7d. Structures & processes of Management Committee & related PA decision making are clearly documented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G26","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F26","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I26","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J26","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G27","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F27","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I27","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J27","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G28","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F28","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I28","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J28","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J29","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J30","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J31","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F32","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J32","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J33","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","12. Current budget",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J34","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J35","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G36","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I36","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J36","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J37","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J38","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","16. Law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J39","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G40","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F40","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I40","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J40","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G41","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F41","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I41","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J41","v":1.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G42","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F42","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I42","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J42","v":0.25},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G43","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F43","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I43","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J43","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G44","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F44","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I44","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J44","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G45","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F45","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I45","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J45","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J46","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G47","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F47","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I47","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J47","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F48","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J48","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Process","19. Research ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F49","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J49","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","20. Monitoring & evaluation (of management activities)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J50","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","21. Resource management ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J51","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","22. Climate change ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F52","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J52","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G53","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F53","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I53","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J53","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G54","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F54","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I54","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J54","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I55","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J55","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G56","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F56","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I56","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J56","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","25. Education & awareness ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J57","v":2},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","26. Government & commercial neighbour cooperation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J58","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J59","v":2},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","28. Fees",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J60","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J61","v":2},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J62","v":3},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","31. Local communities & others with access or user ‘rights’",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J63","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G64","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F64","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I64","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J64","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G65","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F65","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I65","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J65","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G66","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F66","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I66","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J66","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G67","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F67","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I67","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J67","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G68","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F68","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I68","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J68","v":0.5},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in full range of PA decisions ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G69","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F69","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I69","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J69","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G70","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I70","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J70","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Provincial govt",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G71","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F71","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I71","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J71","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & LLG",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G72","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F72","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I72","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J72","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & District reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G73","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F73","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I73","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J73","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Ward reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I74","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J74","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G75","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F75","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I75","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J75","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J76","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31i. Level of support",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J77","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J78","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G79","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F79","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I79","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J79","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G80","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F80","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I80","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J80","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G81","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F81","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I81","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J81","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Output","33. Threats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F82","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J82","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F83","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J83","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J84","v":2},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J85","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F86","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J86","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F87","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J87","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F88","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J88","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F89","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J89","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F90","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J90","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F91","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J91","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F92","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J92","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F93","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J93","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G94","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F94","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I94","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J94","v":0.2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G95","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F95","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I95","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J95","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G96","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F96","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I96","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J96","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G97","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F97","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I97","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J97","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G98","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F98","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I98","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J98","v":0.4},null,null,"Human resources"]
["TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(C2:C97)","v":224},{"$f":"SUM(D2:D97)","v":54},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E97)","v":155.19999999999996},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F97)","v":33.5}]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","Score","Possible Score","% Non-weighted score","Weighted Score","Possible Weighted Score","%"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"SUM(D2:D3,D8:D12,D21:D23,D28)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(C2:C3,C8:C12,C21:C23,C28)","v":23},{"$f":"C103/D103*100","v":13.043478260869565},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F3,F8:F12,F21:F23,F28)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E3,E8:E12,E21:E23,E28)","v":19.8},{"$f":"F103/G103*100","v":15.151515151515152}]
[null,"Input",{"$f":"SUM(D29:D34,D36,D93:D97)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(C29:C34,C36,C93:C97)","v":36},8.3333333333333321,{"$f":"SUM(F29:F34,F36,F93:F97)","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"SUM(E29:E34,E36,E93:E97)","v":24.000000000000007},2.5]
[null,"Process",{"$f":"SUM(D4,D13:D20,D24,D35,D37:D38,D45,D47:D59,D61:D62,D84:D86,D88:D90)","v":20},{"$f":"SUM(C4,C13:C20,C24,C35,C37:C38,C45,C47:C59,C61:C62,C84:C86,C88:C90)","v":81},24.691358024691358,{"$f":"SUM(F4,F13:F20,F24,F37:F38,F35,F45,F47:F59,F61:F62,F84:F86,F88:F90)","v":15.9},{"$f":"SUM(E4,E13:E20,E24,E35,E37:E38,E45,E47:E59,E61:E62,E84:E86,E88:E90)","v":65.650000000000006},24.219345011424217]
[null,"Output",{"$f":"SUM(D60,D69:D77,D81:D82)","v":7},{"$f":"SUM(C69:C77,C81:C82,C60)","v":20},35,{"$f":"SUM(F81:F82,F69:F77,F60)","v":4.75},{"$f":"SUM(E60,E69:E77,E81:E82)","v":16},29.6875]
[null,"Outcome",{"$f":"SUM(D83,D87,D91:D92)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(C83,C87,C91:C92)","v":12},25,{"$f":"SUM(F91:F92,F87,F83)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(E91:E92,E87,E83)","v":12},25]
[null,"Governance",{"$f":"SUM(D5:D7,D25:D27,D39:D44,D46,D63:D68,D78:D80)","v":18},{"$f":"SUM(C5:C7,C25:C27,C39:C44,C46,C63:C68,C78:C80)","v":52},34.615384615384613,{"$f":"SUM(F5:F7,F25:F27,F39:F44,F46,F63:F68,F78:F80)","v":6.25},{"$f":"SUM(E78:E80,E63:E68,E46,E39:E44,E25:E27,E5:E7)","v":17.75},35.2112676056338]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C103:C108)","v":54},{"$f":"SUM(D103:D108)","v":224},24.107142857142858,{"$f":"SUM(F103:F108)","v":33.5},{"$f":"SUM(G103:G108)","v":155.20000000000002},21.58505154639175]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"H103","v":15.151515151515152}]
[null,"Input",2.5]
[null,"Process",24.219345011424217]
[null,"Output",29.6875]
[null,"Outcome",25]
[null,"Governance",35.2112676056338]
[null,"TOTAL",21.58505154639175]
[]
[]
[null,"Themes","Weighted Score","Possible W'ed Score","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Design & establishment",{"$f":"SUM(F2,F12:F20)","v":5.4},{"$f":"SUM(E2,E12:E20)","v":12.400000000000002},{"$f":"C124/D124*100","v":43.548387096774185}]
[null,"Planning & objectives",{"$f":"SUM(F3,F8:F11,F21:F28)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E3,E8:E11,E21:E28)","v":15.3},{"$f":"C125/D125*100","v":0}]
[null,"Legislation, control & enforcement",{"$f":"SUM(F4:F7,F38:F46)","v":7},{"$f":"SUM(E4:E7,E38:E46)","v":20},35]
[null,"Resource management",{"$f":"SUM(F29,F48:F55,F81:F82,F85:F86,F89:F90)","v":3.5},{"$f":"SUM(E29,E48:E55,E81:E82,E85:E86,E89:E90)","v":30},11.666666666666666]
[null,"Human resources",{"$f":"SUM(F30:F32,F47,F63:F68,F93:F97)","v":1.85},{"$f":"SUM(E93:E97,E63:E68,E47,E30:E32)","v":18},10.277777777777779]
[null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment",{"$f":"SUM(F33:F37)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E33:E37)","v":15},0]
[null,"Relationships, education & awareness",{"$f":"SUM(F56:F57,F61:F62,F69:F76)","v":7.75},{"$f":"SUM(E56:E57,E61:E62,E69:E76)","v":16},48.4375]
[null,"Tourism & recreation",{"$f":"SUM(F58:F60)","v":4},{"$f":"SUM(E58:E60)","v":9},44.444444444444443]
[null,"Economic benefit",{"$f":"SUM(F77:F80)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E77:E80)","v":5.5},0]
[null,"Condition of values",{"$f":"SUM(F83:F84,F87:F88,F91:F92)","v":4},{"$f":"SUM(E83:E84,E87:E88,E91:E92)","v":14},28.571428571428569]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C124:C133)","v":33.5},{"$f":"SUM(D124:D133)","v":155.19999999999999},21.585051546391753]

{"sheet":"Attributes (T1)","index":3,"n_rows":81,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":81,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,3]]}
["Protected area attributes (Table 1)"]
[null,"Question","Kuglkane Ranges Protected Zone"]
[]
[1,"Country","Papua New Guinea"]
[2,"Location of protected area","Kuglkane Ranges Protected Zone is located adjacent to Mt Wilhelm National Park  in Gembogl District. The size of the possible extension area is not known but the area is made up of mountain ranges and the area covers the north-west side of the national park that shares a.......????? (Please fix this). Womatne village is the centre of the six council wards of Mitnande Local Level Government which is in the Gembogl District and is accessible by vehicle or on foot. It takes 40 to 50 minutes by vehicle from Kundiawa town to Womatne and another 10 minutes by vehicle to Ward 16 and Ward 17 central village which is Womkama. It will then take 30 minutes by foot or by vehicle it would take 10 minutes to reach Ward 14 and 15 which is Kurunugl.It will then take 15 minutes drive from Kurunugl to Ward 12 and 13 central village called Bongugo."]
["2a","Province(s)","Simbu"]
["2b","District/s","Gembogl"]
["2c","Local level government(s)","Mitnande"]
["2d","Wards (Name and/or number)","6 council wards - Kuglkane Wards 12-17"]
[3,"Name of the protected area","Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone"]
["3a","CEPA Protected Area site code","KUGL"]
[4,"World Database of Protected Areas site code","Nil"]
[5,"Date when the protected area was formally established (dd/mm/yyyy)","The site has not been formally established"]
["5a","Gazettal information or designation information (what does the date above refer to?)","NA"]
[6,"What is the size of the protected area (in km2)?","Not known"]
[7,"Protected area designation(s): What level or kind of protected area is it? ","The site does not have a protected area designation. It represents a possible extension of Mt Wihelm National Park"]
[8,"IUCN Protected area category ","Nil"]
[9,"IUCN Protected area category (other) ","Nil"]
[10,"International designations. Is the site listed under an international designation e.g. World Heritage site or Ramsar site, or WWF Global 2000 etc? (Y/N)","Nil"]
["10a","World Heritage site (Y/N)","Nil"]
["10b","Ramsar site (Y/N)","Nil"]
["10c","UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves (Y/N)","Nil"]
[11,"Other designations. Is the site listed under any other designation? (Y/N) ","Nil"]
[12,"Has the site been identified as a site of particular importance for biodiversity? (Y/N)","Yes. It is a Key Biodiversity Area and an Important Bird and Biodiveristy Area"]
[13,"Who owns the protected area?","Customary landowners"]
["13a","If the protected area is owned by customary landowners, please indicate all the relevant Clans.","Kuglkane Tribe - Ward 12 to Ward 17 - 6 Council Wards including: Ward 12, Giglekane and Komkane; Ward 13 -Enduek; Ward 14 -Sambuglkane; Ward 15 - Inauglkane, Gendku and Wopana; Ward 16 -Awakane; and  Ward 17 - Gandiglnem."]
["13b","How many households live within the protected area? (e.g. 15)",1400]
["13c","How many people live within the protected area? (e.g. 367)","10, 000"]
["13d","What proportion of the population living within the protected area comprises children (under 18 years old)?",0.1]
["13e","Briefly outline what surrounds the protected area","Settlements"]
[14,"Who manages the protected area? ","Customary landowners"]
[15,"Are there any special areas where restrictions or rules are in place that limit the activities that can take place in that area?","Living or everlasting water (Kornumbun)- this is a sacred water that is believed to bring healing to sick people and is treated as a sacred lake and people are restricted or not allowed to go closer to this creek unnecessarily."]
[16,"Briefly describe the cultural system, family, traditions, pasin tumbuna and the way in which customary landowners care for (lukautim) the land/sea in the protected area (i.e. if the protected area is owned by customary landowners).","Patrilineal- decision making for use of resources is done by men"]
[17,"What rights do ‘other’ people have in relation to the protected area? (i.e. those who are not customary landowners)","Equal/same rights are given by the community to the person regardless of gender and comes from the same village but lives outside of the area and still assists the community. (This is not clear to me - can you please expand). Also women married outside are given certain rights over access to the land (can you also please expand on these rights)"]
[18,"What is the process for deciding how land/sea in the protected area is accessed and used?","Access or use of resources is controlled by traditional practises following the cultural system e.g. clan-based access and user rights"]
[19,"Total number of staff. Does the protected area have staff (paid workers)? (Y/N)","No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"]
["19a","Number of Permanent paid workers and their positions (e.g. 5 rangers, 1 manager)","No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"]
["19b","Number of Temporary paid workers and their positions (e.g. 4 caretakers, 5 rangers)","No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"]
["19c","How many people do work in the protected area on a voluntary basis (not paid)? ","No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"]
["19d","What type of work do these voluntary workers/customary landowners undertake?","No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"]
[20,"What is the annual budget (Kina/ USD) for recurrent (operational) funds (excluding staff salary costs)?","No budget received from the government"]
["20a","Year for which the budget is reported","NA"]
["20b","Recurrent (operational) funds","NA"]
["20c","Project or other supplementary or special funds (excluding staff salary costs)","Nil"]
[21,"How many visitors came to the protected area last calendar year? ",10]
["21a","In what year were these visitor numbers reported? (yyyy)","2016 - 2018"]
["21b","Describe the main reasons for the tourist visits","Walk the two foot tracks"]
[22,"Main value 1 ",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Biodiversity "}]
[null,"Main value 2",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B5","v":"Floating stone"}]
[null,"Main value 3",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B6","v":"Dragon stone (teme kombuglo)"}]
[null,"Main value 4","Heart lake "]
[null,"Main value 5","War relics"]
[null,"Main value 6","Living/Everlasting water (nigl tekepagua)"]
[23,"What are the benefits that arise from having the protected area?","The forest will provide the following: asorb excess carbon, animal recovery and increase, clean water, tourism and cultural practises."]
[24,"Management objective 1","Protect biodiveristy ; important plants,animals and wildlife (eg; butterfly and orchids)"]
[null,"Management objective 2                                     ","Protect forest for cultural places and practises"]
[null,"Management objective 3                                     ","Protect the significant habitats such as alphine grassland,lakes"]
[null,"Management objective 4                                     ","Protect endangered animals example; singing dogs, dwarf cassowary,wild ducks and bird of paradise"]
[null,"Management objective 5                                   ","Protect valuable strong trees for bulding houses - endayomba and daka (iron post) and special bush vines (waing) for building houses - livelihoods"]
[null,"Management objective 6                                  ","Protect endemic species; example; flowering fern plant"]
[null,"Management objective 7","For future generations for clean water and fresh air"]
[null,"Management objective 8","To protect sacred sites for future generation"]
[25,"Are there any negative impacts or burdens on the wellbeing of customary landowners and others with user/access rights to the protected area that result from the protected area? If so, list them briefly here","Stop cutting down of trees,Stop burning bush for hunting and gardening purposes, Provide refuge to other animals that will have negative imapct on the other  animals and the communites, temporary restictions of use of trational materials, restriction/limiting the free use of the forest to all"]
[26,"Total number of people involved in completing or answering the questions in this assessment",6]
["26a","Protected area manager (this includes the management committee members)","NA - since it is a proposed area there is no management committee members"]
["26b","Protected area staff (paid workers)","NA-there are no paid staff since it is a proposed area"]
["26c","Other Protected Area authority staff","NA- there is no PA authority staff since it is a proposed area"]
["26d","Volunteer","NA-no volunteers since it is a proposed area "]
["26e","NGO","NA"]
["26f","Customary landowners, including the local community members and clan leaders","Ms Wari Clement, Mr Murba Anton, Mr Ben Gende, Ms Carolyn Sundu, Ms Rachael Daka and Mr Peter Tora"]
["26g","Donors and/or sponsors","No"]
["26h","External consultants","No"]
["26i","Others ","No"]
[27,"Please note if the assessment was conducted in association with a particular project, on behalf of an organisation or donor.","No"]
["28a","The Facilitator Name and position","Alu Kaiye"]
["28b","Facilitator - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
["28c","Facilitator - Address, Email, Phone","P.O. Box 6601 Boroko NCD, email: alukaiye@gmail.com  Phone:72320364  "]
[29,"Recorder- Name and position","Nancy Bobora  "]
[null,"Recorder - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
[null,"Recorder - Address, Email, Phone","6601, Boroko, National Capital District,nancy_bobora@yahoo.com.au, 301 4500,7561 9519"]
[30,"Date the assessment carried out (e.g. 29/01/2019)","28th - 30th September 2021"]

{"sheet":"Likes (P1,1)","index":4,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1]]}
["Protected area description - \"What I like about the protected area\""]
["PA Name","Description of values",null,null,null,null,null,null,"I have cropped the image and lightened it (picture format, corrections) - makes it a bit easier to read. Can you also include a map of the proposed area if you have one (i.e. insert here)"]
["Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone","We have two stones, one is called floating stone. From afar it looks like it is floating. One stone sits on the other'. 'We have Living water (Korongo). It makes you live longer and also original - magic water. Hunters pass by and respect the water by not making any noise'.  'Many lake/hidden waters  are found in the area - Heart Lake is red in color. Thse are restricted lakes'."]

{"sheet":"Values Checklist (T2)","index":5,"n_rows":54,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":54,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,6]]}
["Checklist of protected area values and benefits (Table 2)"]
["Q. No.","(Summary Question)","Question: Does the protected area:","Answer (click on arrow)","Score","Total score possible","Comment (to help explain the score)"]
[1,"Biodiversity","Provide for biodiversity (i.e. have many different kinds of plants, animals and ecosystems)?","A lot",2,2]
[2,"Special plants & animals","Have species of plants and animals listed as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered","Some",1,1,"Tree kangaroo, Bird of Paradise, grass wallaby"]
[3,"Locally endemic plants or animal spp","Have species of plants or animals found only in the protected area or nearby locations?","Some",1,1,"Flowering fern plant, grass - Wayamaia - (White Kapuk)"]
[4,"Important ecosystems","Contain important ecosystems (e.g. wetlands, grasslands, coral reefs etc)? ","A lot",2,2,"Highland grassland, lakes, boulders"]
[5,"Protect clean, fresh water","Protect clean, fresh water?","A lot",2,2,"Still intact"]
[6,"Religious or spiritual significance","Have religious or spiritual significance (e.g. tambu places, sacred sites)?","Some",1,1,"Use foot tracks for hunting and checking the war relics of World War 2"]
[7,"Scientific value","Have scientific value?","Some",1,1,"Wildlife Conservation Society"]
[8,"Source of employment for local communities","Provide a source of employment for local communities?","Some",1,1,"Guides and Rangers"]
[9,"Resources for local subsistence","Provide resources for local subsistence (e.g. food, building materials, medicines etc)?","A lot",2,2,"Timber, Watercress, Flowering fern plant, Kunai Grass, Pandanas (karuka), strong trees for house building, bush vines for making houses"]
[10,"Resources for sale & benefits aid community d'ment & well-being","Provide resources for sale, with the benefits used to enable community development and enhance well-being?","A lot",2,2,"Pandanus, mushroom, bush Kumu, bulb onion, garlic, potato, carrot"]
[11,"Foster & attract community d'ment projects to enhance community well-being","Foster and attract community development projects to enhance community well-being?","None",0,0]
[12,"Place where culture, language & traditions are practiced","Provide a place where culture, language and traditional practices can be practiced?","Some",1,1,"Exchange with each other with the following Potato, bulb onion, carrot, kumu, pandanas"]
[13,"People who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations","Have people who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations?","Some",1,1,"Traditional Bilas, Singsing/dances- traditional face painting"]
[14,"Plant species of high cultural or economic importance","Have plant species of high cultural or economic importance?","Some",1,1,"Bark of trees "]
[15,"Animal species of high cultural or economic importance","Have animal species of high cultural or economic importance?","Some",1,1,"Animals (WHICH), bird feathers for tradtional singing, "]
[16,"Historical sites","Have historical sites?","Some",1,1,"War relics from World War 2, Three foot tracks used for hunting"]
[17,"Nice scenery","Have nice scenery (naispela hap long lukim)?","A lot",2,2,"Grassland plains, glacial lakes,floating stone, sharp rocks and mountain ranges"]
[18,"Tourism activities now","Have any tourism activities now?","Some",1,1,"One foot track is currently used for trekking by tourists"]
[19,"Potential for tourism activities in the future","Have the potential for tourism activities in the future?","Some",1,1,"Distance is short and track is not too risky"]
[20,"Role in providing educational opportunities","Have a role in providing educational opportunities?","A lot",2,2,"Teach and conduct more awareness on glacials to the community"]
[null,"TOTAL","TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(E3:E22)","v":26},{"$f":"SUM(F3:F22)","v":26}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Insert this legend onto your graph","Legend"]
[null,null,null,0,"None"]
[null,null,null,1,"Some"]
[null,null,null,2,"A lot"]

{"sheet":"Key Values (T3)","index":6,"n_rows":9,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":9,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area values (Table 3)"]
["No.","Key values ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. only known breeding area for the PNG Heron)","(e.g. large freshwater wetland areas immediately above high tide provide nesting sites and food for rearing chicks. Island location means no interference from feral animals or from vehicles)."]
[1,"Biodiversity ","Protect alphine grassland and plains, plants and wildlife"]
[2,"Floating stone","One big flat stone sitting on-top of another stone and from afar the stones look like they are floating on water and hanging on-top"]
[3,"Dragon stone (teme kombuglo)","Looks like the shape of a dragon and has two wings,  two legs and has an open mouth and has a tail"]
[4,"Heart lake","Red in color and heart shaped and there is a sharp boulder (tauia kaulang) beside the lake"]
[5,"War relics","Chain and cement under the ground"]
[6,"Living or everlasting water (nigl tekepagua)","Water that will make a person live longer or have a longer lifespan when one drinks the water. The everlasting water is surrounded by round boulders and there is an outlet with a natural looking tap for water to flow out"]

{"sheet":"Benefits (T4)","index":7,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area benefits (Table 4)"]
["No.","Benefit/Positive","Brief description "]
[]
[1,"Absorb excess carbon","Forests provide carbon sink"]
[2,"Animal recovery and increase","Increase in population of important animals such as cassowary"]
[3,"Clean water","provide clean water for local communities and Kundiawa township"]
[4,"Tourism activities","forests and beautiful scenic mountain views attracts tourists "]
[5,"Cultural practises","suppy materials such as bird feathers and plant leaves called tangets that are worn during tradtional singsing"]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Please start all these answers with a capital letter - they need to read like a sentence. Please do this for all answers to questions."]

{"sheet":"Negatives (T5)","index":8,"n_rows":9,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":9,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area negative impacts (Table 5)"]
["No.","Negative impact ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. restrictions on fishing)","(explain why this is a negative)"]
[1,"Stop cutting down of trees","No building materials from trees to build houses, fence"]
[2,"Stop hunting","Restriction placed on hunting will result in less supply of protein for consumption"]
[3,"Protecting habitats may promote increase in dangerous species eg; snakes","Provide refuge to other animals that will have negative impact on the other  animals and the communites"]
[4,"Tempoarty restictions of use of trational materials","Eg; bird feathers"]
[5,"Restriction/limiting the free use of the forest to all","Eg; free hunting access by all"]
[5]

{"sheet":"Threats (T6)","index":9,"n_rows":72,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":72,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[69,0,71,0],[0,0,0,9],[32,0,38,0],[39,0,42,0],[43,0,50,0],[51,0,54,0],[55,0,63,0],[64,0,68,0],[3,0,6,0],[7,0,12,0],[13,0,15,0],[16,0,19,0],[20,0,25,0],[26,0,31,0]]}
["Detailed assessment of threats (Table 6)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Meaning of ratings"]
["Threat category\n","Threat ","Description ","Threat extent ","Threat extent score","Threat severity ","Threat severity score","Management response now","Future management response ","Notes includings values affected"]
[null,"Sub-categories of threat","If the threat is present, insert details of the threat in the PA","Select from pull down menu","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","Select from pull down menu (leave blank if not applicable)","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","List the management responses that are occurring NOW","List what management needs to do to address the threat","Write additional information here",null,"Extent rating","Meaning: the threat is…."]
["1: Housing and commercial development within a protected area\nThreats from human settlements or other non-agricultural land uses","1.1 Housing and settlement ","If the threat is present, insert details of the threat to the PA in this columnm. So every low, medium high etc MUST have a comment in this column - to help the reader understand what the threat is.","Low",1,"Low",1,"Nothing at the moment","If a threat is present please write something here to indicate what is planned for the future. If people do not think anything needs to be done, just say so.","It is managable by the communities as they cut trees near their homes to build houses",null,"Very high (4)","widespread and affects the value throughout the PA "]
[null,"1.2 Commercial and industrial areas",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D5=\"select\",\" \",D5=\"very high\",4, D5=\"high\",3,D5=\"medium\",2,D5=\"low\",1, D5=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F5=\"select\",\" \",F5=\"very high\",4, F5=\"high\",3,F5=\"medium\",2,F5=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA",null,"High (3)","widespread and affects the value at many locations "]
[null,"1.3 Tourism and recreation infrastructure (e.g. structures)",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Nil",null,"NA",null,"Medium (2)","localised and affects the value at some locations"]
[null,"1.4 Population increase in the protected area community","Important to know population numbers, growth rate - is there a census? So please fill all these rows in.","Very high",4,"High",3,"Nil","Carry out more education awareness on high population growth",null,null,"Low (1)","localised and found in only limited locations and the impact on our values is limited"]
["2: Agriculture and aquaculture within a protected area\nThreats to the proteted area from all kinds of farming and grazing including plantations, forestry and fishing","2.1 Customary landowner and community gardens and small crops",null,"Medium",2,"Low",1,"Nil",null,null,null,"None (0)","threat is not present"]
[null,"2.2 Drug cultivation",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Community monitors",null,null,null,"Severity rating","Meaning: the threat is …."]
[null,"2.3 Wood and pulp plantations \n",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D10=\"select\",\" \",D10=\"very high\",4, D10=\"high\",3,D10=\"medium\",2,D10=\"low\",1, D10=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F10=\"select\",\" \",F10=\"very high\",4, F10=\"high\",3,F10=\"medium\",2,F10=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA",null,"Very high (4)","likely to destroy some protected area value(s) (e.g. it might destroy a type of animal or plant, or your traditional gardens)"]
[null,"2.4 Livestock farming and grazing ",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D11=\"select\",\" \",D11=\"very high\",4, D11=\"high\",3,D11=\"medium\",2,D11=\"low\",1, D11=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F11=\"select\",\" \",F11=\"very high\",4, F11=\"high\",3,F11=\"medium\",2,F11=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA",null,"High (3)","likely to seriously degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs "]
[null,"2.5 Marine and freshwater aquaculture ",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D12=\"select\",\" \",D12=\"very high\",4, D12=\"high\",3,D12=\"medium\",2,D12=\"low\",1, D12=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",null,null,null,"NA",null,"Medium (2)","likely to moderately degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs – they are damaging values but not so badly "]
[null,"2.6 Commercial plantations",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D13=\"select\",\" \",D13=\"very high\",4, D13=\"high\",3,D13=\"medium\",2,D13=\"low\",1, D13=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F13=\"select\",\" \",F13=\"very high\",4, F13=\"high\",3,F13=\"medium\",2,F13=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA",null,"Low (1)","only slightly impacting on protected areas values "]
["3. Energy production and mining within a protected area\nThreats from production of non-biological resources ","3.1 Oil and gas drilling and pipeline construction",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D14=\"select\",\" \",D14=\"very high\",4, D14=\"high\",3,D14=\"medium\",2,D14=\"low\",1, D14=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F14=\"select\",\" \",F14=\"very high\",4, F14=\"high\",3,F14=\"medium\",2,F14=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"3.2 Mining and quarrying",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D15=\"select\",\" \",D15=\"very high\",4, D15=\"high\",3,D15=\"medium\",2,D15=\"low\",1, D15=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F15=\"select\",\" \",F15=\"very high\",4, F15=\"high\",3,F15=\"medium\",2,F15=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"3.3 Energy generation",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D16=\"select\",\" \",D16=\"very high\",4, D16=\"high\",3,D16=\"medium\",2,D16=\"low\",1, D16=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F16=\"select\",\" \",F16=\"very high\",4, F16=\"high\",3,F16=\"medium\",2,F16=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
["4. Transportation and service corridors\nThreats from long narrow transport corridors and the vehicles (and people) that use some of them","4.1 Roads, railroads and paths/tracks ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Nil"]
[null,"4.2 Utility and service lines",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D18=\"select\",\" \",D18=\"very high\",4, D18=\"high\",3,D18=\"medium\",2,D18=\"low\",1, D18=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F18=\"select\",\" \",F18=\"very high\",4, F18=\"high\",3,F18=\"medium\",2,F18=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"4.3 Shipping lanes and canals",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D19=\"select\",\" \",D19=\"very high\",4, D19=\"high\",3,D19=\"medium\",2,D19=\"low\",1, D19=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F19=\"select\",\" \",F19=\"very high\",4, F19=\"high\",3,F19=\"medium\",2,F19=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"4.4 Flight paths",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D20=\"select\",\" \",D20=\"very high\",4, D20=\"high\",3,D20=\"medium\",2,D20=\"low\",1, D20=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F20=\"select\",\" \",F20=\"very high\",4, F20=\"high\",3,F20=\"medium\",2,F20=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
["5. Biological resource use and harm within a protected area\nThreats from the use of \"wild\" biological resources including both deliberate and unintentional harvesting effects (Note this includes hunting and killing of animals). ","5.1 Hunting, killing and collecting terrestrial (native) animals (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",null,"High",3,"High",3,"Nil",null,"Not a protected area yet"]
[null,"5.2 Gathering terrestrial (native) plants or plant products (non-timber) (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",null,"Medium",2,"Medium",2,"Nil",null,"Not a protected area yet"]
[null,"5.3a Logging and wood harvesting for local/customary use",null,"Medium",2,"High",3,"Nil",null,"Not a protected area yet"]
[null,"  5.3b Logging and wood harvesting – commercial logging",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D24=\"select\",\" \",D24=\"very high\",4, D24=\"high\",3,D24=\"medium\",2,D24=\"low\",1, D24=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F24=\"select\",\" \",F24=\"very high\",4, F24=\"high\",3,F24=\"medium\",2,F24=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"  5.4a Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for local/customary use",null,"High",3,"Very high",4]
[null,"5.4b Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for commercial use",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D26=\"select\",\" \",D26=\"very high\",4, D26=\"high\",3,D26=\"medium\",2,D26=\"low\",1, D26=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F26=\"select\",\" \",F26=\"very high\",4, F26=\"high\",3,F26=\"medium\",2,F26=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
["6. Human intrusions and disturbance within a protected area\nThreats from human activities that alter, destroy or disturb habitats and species associated with non-consumptive uses of biological resources","6.1 Recreational and tourism activities",null,"Medium",2,"Low",1]
[null,"6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises ",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D28=\"select\",\" \",D28=\"very high\",4, D28=\"high\",3,D28=\"medium\",2,D28=\"low\",1, D28=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F28=\"select\",\" \",F28=\"very high\",4, F28=\"high\",3,F28=\"medium\",2,F28=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"6.3 Research, education and other wor-related activities in the protected area",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Only Wildlife Conservation Society conducted research on wildlife once only"]
[null,"6.4 Activities of the protected area managers (e.g. construction or vehicle use)",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D30=\"select\",\" \",D30=\"very high\",4, D30=\"high\",3,D30=\"medium\",2,D30=\"low\",1, D30=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F30=\"select\",\" \",F30=\"very high\",4, F30=\"high\",3,F30=\"medium\",2,F30=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"6.5 Deliberate destructive activities or threats to protected area staff and visitors ",null,"High",3,"Very high",4,"Nil",null,"Fire used only during dry season"]
[null,"6.6 Impacts from cultural and religious tourism",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Nil"]
["7. Changes to natural systems \nThreats from other actions that convert or degrade habitat or change the way the ecosystem functions.","7.1 Habitat clearing ",null,"High",3,"High",3,"Nil ",null,"Landslides during the rain season destroys homes,gardens,animals and the environment"]
[null,"7.2 Fire and fire suppression",null,"Medium",2,"High",3,"Men in the village some time ago during the dry season had to go out to the head of the grassland plains for weeks to put out the fires leaving the women and children behind","Carry out more education awareness on bush fires and effects. Stop people from throwing broken glass in the grassland plains because fires start naturally from this.","Occurs naturally during dry season only"]
[null,"7.3 Dams, water flow modification and water management/use ",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D35=\"select\",\" \",D35=\"very high\",4, D35=\"high\",3,D35=\"medium\",2,D35=\"low\",1, D35=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F35=\"select\",\" \",F35=\"very high\",4, F35=\"high\",3,F35=\"medium\",2,F35=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"7.4 Increased fragmentation within the protected area ",null,"High",3,"Medium",2,"Nil",null,"Only foot tracks within the area"]
[null,"7.5 The protected area is separated from other natural habitat",null,"Medium",2,"Medium",2,"Nil",null,"Old gardens are left after usage and grows back into the natural habitat"]
[null,"7.6 Other ‘edge effects’ (impacts) happening on the boundary of the protected area ",null,"Medium",2,"Medium",2,"Nil",null,"Old gardens are left after usage and grows back into the natural habitat"]
[null,"7.7 Loss of keystone species",null,"High",3,"High",3,"Nil",null,"Cassowary dispersal of seeds"]
["8. Invasive and other problematic species and genes. Threats from terrestrial and aquatic non-native and native plants, animals, pathogens/microbes or genetic materials that have, or are predicted to have, harmful effects on biodiversity following introduction, spread and/or increase","8.1  Introduced (pest) plants",null,"Very high",4,"Very high",4,"Nil"]
[null,"8.2 Introduced (pest) animals ",null,"Very high",4,"Very high",4,"Nil",null,"Poison trout or talapia"]
[null,"8.3 Diseases such as fungus or viruses that make native plants or animals sick ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Nil",null,"Coffee and Onion disease"]
[null,"8.4 Introduced genetic material",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D43=\"select\",\" \",D43=\"very high\",4, D43=\"high\",3,D43=\"medium\",2,D43=\"low\",1, D43=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F43=\"select\",\" \",F43=\"very high\",4, F43=\"high\",3,F43=\"medium\",2,F43=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
["9. Pollution entering or generated  \nThreats from pollution and/or excess materials or energy from specific sites or more general sources ","9.1 Household sewage and urban/village waste water \n",null,"Low",1,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F44=\"select\",\" \",F44=\"very high\",4, F44=\"high\",3,F44=\"medium\",2,F44=\"low\",1)","v":" "},"Nil"]
[null,"9.2 Sewage and waste water from protected area facilities",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D45=\"select\",\" \",D45=\"very high\",4, D45=\"high\",3,D45=\"medium\",2,D45=\"low\",1, D45=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F45=\"select\",\" \",F45=\"very high\",4, F45=\"high\",3,F45=\"medium\",2,F45=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"9.3 Industrial, mining and military effluents and discharges",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D46=\"select\",\" \",D46=\"very high\",4, D46=\"high\",3,D46=\"medium\",2,D46=\"low\",1, D46=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F46=\"select\",\" \",F46=\"very high\",4, F46=\"high\",3,F46=\"medium\",2,F46=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"9.4 Agricultural and forestry effluents",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,"Nil"]
[null,"9.5 Garbage and solid waste ",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D48=\"select\",\" \",D48=\"very high\",4, D48=\"high\",3,D48=\"medium\",2,D48=\"low\",1, D48=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F48=\"select\",\" \",F48=\"very high\",4, F48=\"high\",3,F48=\"medium\",2,F48=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"9.6 Air-borne pollutants",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,null,null,"Smoke from bush fires (natural and man-made)"]
[null,"9.7 Excess energy",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D50=\"select\",\" \",D50=\"very high\",4, D50=\"high\",3,D50=\"medium\",2,D50=\"low\",1, D50=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F50=\"select\",\" \",F50=\"very high\",4, F50=\"high\",3,F50=\"medium\",2,F50=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"9.8 Sound pollution (especially from roads)",null,"Low",1,"Low",1]
["10. Geological events \nGeological events may be part of natural disturbance regimes in many ecosystems. However, they can be a threat if a species or habitat is damaged and has lost its resilience and is vulnerable to disturbance. Management capacity to respond to some of these changes may be limited.","10.1 Volcanoes (ash and lava)\n",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D52=\"select\",\" \",D52=\"very high\",4, D52=\"high\",3,D52=\"medium\",2,D52=\"low\",1, D52=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F52=\"select\",\" \",F52=\"very high\",4, F52=\"high\",3,F52=\"medium\",2,F52=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"10.2 Earthquakes/Tsunamis ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1]
[null,"10.3 Avalanches/ Landslides ",null,"High",3,"High",3,null,null,"Destroy homes, gradens,environment,kills animals and people"]
[null,"10.4 Erosion and deposition",null,"High",3,"High",3,null,null,"Heavy rainfall causes erosion from the mountain that travels downhill and spoils the river and the water with all the debris and soil"]
["11. Climate change and severe weather  \nThreats from long-term climatic changes which may be linked to global warming and other severe climatic/ weather events outside of the natural range of variation","11.1 Habitat shifting and alteration ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,null,null,"Gardens are made near their homes and not in the forest"]
[null,"11.2 Droughts ",null,"High",3,"Very high",4,null,null,"Had drought for the past months and it affected their food crops,trees and animals"]
[null,"11.3 Temperature extremes ",null,"High",3,"High",3,null,null,"Trees, plants and animals affected"]
[null,"11.4 Storms and flooding",null,"Medium",2,"Medium",2]
[null,"11.5 Ocean acidification",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D60=\"select\",\" \",D60=\"very high\",4, D60=\"high\",3,D60=\"medium\",2,D60=\"low\",1, D60=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F60=\"select\",\" \",F60=\"very high\",4, F60=\"high\",3,F60=\"medium\",2,F60=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"11.6 Sea level rise",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D61=\"select\",\" \",D61=\"very high\",4, D61=\"high\",3,D61=\"medium\",2,D61=\"low\",1, D61=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F61=\"select\",\" \",F61=\"very high\",4, F61=\"high\",3,F61=\"medium\",2,F61=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"11.7 Coral bleaching",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D62=\"select\",\" \",D62=\"very high\",4, D62=\"high\",3,D62=\"medium\",2,D62=\"low\",1, D62=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F62=\"select\",\" \",F62=\"very high\",4, F62=\"high\",3,F62=\"medium\",2,F62=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"11.8 Saltwater coming into the protected area",null,"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(D63=\"select\",\" \",D63=\"very high\",4, D63=\"high\",3,D63=\"medium\",2,D63=\"low\",1, D63=\"none\",0)","v":" "},"select",{"$f":"_xlfn.IFS(F63=\"select\",\" \",F63=\"very high\",4, F63=\"high\",3,F63=\"medium\",2,F63=\"low\",1)","v":" "},null,null,"NA"]
[null,"11.9 Other climate changes",null,"High",3,"Low",1,null,null,"Changes in season of Pandanas,Coffee and Mareta"]
["12. Cultural and social threats ","12.1 Loss of cultural links, traditional knowledge, language, dress, sing sings, respect and/or management practices",null,"Medium",3,"Low",1]
[null,"12.2 Natural deterioration of important cultural site values ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1]
[null,"12.3 Destruction of cultural heritage buildings, gardens, sites etc ",null,"Low",1,"Low",1]
[null,"12.4 Loss of land tenure",null,"Low",1,"Low",1]
[null,"12.5 Other cultural/social threats",null,"Medium",2,"Low",1]
["13. Governance problems","13.1 Conflicting policies across sectors",null,"Low",1,"Low",1,null,null,"For now there are no other policies except conservation"]
[null,"13.2 Confusion about government roles and responsibilities",null,"Very high",4,"High",3,null,null,"People in the communities do not fully understand the roles and responsibilities of the three arms of the government"]
[null,"13.3 Lack of coordination across all levels of government",null,"High",3,"High",3,null,null,"Support and coordination by the three levels of the government is not helpful and not effective"]

{"sheet":"Worst threat (T7)","index":10,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,3,2,3],[0,0,0,1]]}
["Worst threats (Table 7)"]
["Rank order","Threat","Threat number ","Additional comments"]
[null,"(most significant first)","(copy from Table 6 e.g. 11.1)"]
[1,"Lack of coordination across all levels of government.",13.1,"A project is brought to the area by one arm of the government and does not complete its phase, then leaves and then the arm of government brings in another project to work at the same area."]
[2,"Deliberate destructive activities or threats to the land by individual landowners in a protectd area",6.5,"Landowners destroy their own land and forest as they think that they are the owners and no one will have a say."]
[3,"Fire and fire management suppression (including deliberate fires)",7.2,"Some time ago there was a bush fire and the men had to go up to the bush for a week to put out the fires"]
[4,"Habitat Clearing",7.1,"Landslides during the rain season destroys homes, gardens, animals and the environment"]
[5,"Landslides/Avalanches",10.3,"Destroy homes, gradens,environment,kills animals and people"]

{"sheet":"Scorecard (T8)","index":11,"n_rows":99,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":99,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,1,0,13]]}
[null,"METT Scorecard (Table 8)"]
["Category","Issue","Question","Select response (from pull down menu)","Response","Score","Possible score ","Weighting","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted score","Evidence & Justification (Reasons for choosing the response)","Actions to improve management","Information Source (Select from pull down menu)","Comments on information source (add additional sources here)"]
["Planning","1. Legal status","Does the protected area have legal status or is it established under “other effective means”? (e.g. in the case of private reserves is it covered by a covenant or similar)? ","A. The protected area is not gazetted/approved by national or provincial government or has not been established through ‘other effective means’",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D3,Responses!B2:D7,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E3,Responses!C2:E7,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,{"$f":"G3*H3","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F3=\"not relevant\",\" \",F3*H3)","v":0},"Area is outside of Mt Wilhelm National Park. The community are now deciding to protect the area.","So what needs to happen next?",null,"Please use the pull down menu in column M to indicate the source of information - I guess this would be customary knowledge in this case. Please fix for all empty cells."]
["Planning","2. Protected area objectives ","Is protected area management based on agreed objectives?","A. No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area to guide management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!B8:D13,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E4,Responses!C8:E13,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,{"$f":"G4*H4","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",\" \",F4*H4)","v":0},"It is not a gazetted protected area yet.","So what needs to happen next?"]
["Process","3. Protected area regulations or customary laws/rules","Are laws, rules or agreements in place to manage land or marine use and activities in the protected area in accordance with the management objectives? (includes hunting, logging, mining, fishing)","C. Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist, but there are some weaknesses or gaps",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!B14:D19,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E5,Responses!C14:E19,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"Customary laws-elderly people advised the people to not cross borders as this will create disputes between other clans - tumbunas says when you go to the forest do not cut tress unnecessarily but do selective cutting of few trees only","no regulation and monitoring and enforcement of customary laws DO YOU MEAN - there is a need for regulation ….........etc>","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules","Are the rules/laws/regulations relating to the protected area clearly defined and documented?","A. Protected area-related rules/laws/regulations are not clearly defined and documented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!B20:D25,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E6,Responses!C20:E25,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Cutomary laws are passed on from ancestors to the current generation","document (write/record) tradtional stories for our children and future generation"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ","Are the rights of people to use the protected area and its resources clearly defined and documented?","C. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!B26:D31,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E7,Responses!C26:E31,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,0.5,"Access rights are known by everyone. They are not documented but are passed down from the ancestors.","More awareness of acess rights to be carried out in communites - community awareness-village court"]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights","What percentage of adults in the protected area and local community are aware of their user/access rights (e.g. to hunt, collect, fish etc)","B.   Some (25-50%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!B32:D37,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E8,Responses!C32:E37,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"Less than half the people are aware of their user/access rights relating to cutting down of trees or colleting anything from the bush. Can you say anything about which people/groups of people are the most well-informed? Who is not informed?","Awareness is done by the individuals or groups in public - also environment groups (NGO) conducting awareness. Hausman play a vital role in communication (CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS) - some areas effective and other areas not effective. We need to improve community halls/resource centres so that information is passed to everyone in the community or village."]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the protected area","Does planning for land and coastal/marine uses outside the protected area recognise the protected area and contribute to achieving the management objectives?","A. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the needs of the protected area and the resulting land/sea uses and policies harm the protected area ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!B38:D43,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E9,Responses!C38:E43,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Animals are hunted for food and to sustain the livelihood of the people in the community. However, the rules and regulations of the proposed protected area are not fully understood by the community (SO WHAT? - are others hunting in the proposed PA???). Also plants are taken by tourists, locals or other people as they do not consider the rules of Mt Wilhelm.","What is needed?"]
["Planning","4a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation","Planning and management in the wider catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provisions for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. air/water/noise pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F10=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},0.4,1.2000000000000002,{"$f":"IF(F10=\"NA\",\" \",F10*H10)","v":0},null,"What is needed?"]
["Planning","4b. Land and water planning for connectivity","Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,{"$f":"IF(F11=\"NA\",\" \",F11*H11)","v":0},"Can you please check this answer. Isn't a prime puirpose of the proposed PA to extend the area given protection and to form a landscape corridor - hence planning for connectivity is very important here - BUT I may have this wrong - please check."]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation","Planning addresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,{"$f":"IF(F12=\"NA\",\" \",F12*H12)","v":0},null,"What is needed?"]
["Planning","5. Protected area design","Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecosystems and water catchments?","D.   Protected area size and the boundaries (i.e. the design) are very good and we can achieve our objectives",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,3,FALSE)","v":3},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F13=\"NA\",\" \",F13*H13)","v":3},"The size of the forest is large and conatins various habitatas,ecosystems and different species and can be conserved. Maybe need to say that the boundaries are not confirmed - is this correct?","What is needed?"]
["Process","6a. On ground boundary marking of protected area","Is the protected area boundary marked on the ground (land/sea)?","A.   None or only a small section of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!B50:D55,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E14,Responses!C50:E55,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.3,0.89999999999999991,0,"Using natural features as boundaries such as rivers and ranges","GPS coordinates to be used as marke the boundary clearly FIX this"]
["Process","6b. Map of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are marked on a map (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.4,0.4,0,null,"Create a boundary  when it is protetced",null,"IRRM a registered ngo already created a boundary using GPS coordinates for a foot track"]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are recorded in a GIS format (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0,null,"Identify boundaries and get a GPS reading"]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the protected area ","What proportion of land owners (e.g. customary landowning adults) are aware of the protected area boundaries? ","C.   Many (51-75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E17,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"Customary  Landowners know internal and external boundaries","Need to improve boundaries-ILG needs to be registerd but all should come to one common understanding"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area know the location of the boundary?","C.   Many (51-75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E18,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"Customary  Landowners know internal and external boundaries","Need to improve boundaries-ILG needs to be registerd but all should come to one common understanding"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area respect the boundary?","B.   Some (25-50%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E19,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.4,1.2000000000000002,0.4,"Some borders are internal and do not have disputes while other borders are shared and they have disputes over animals, trees, plants and land","Need an ILG to be registerd. Protected area Objection period should be agreed by both sides that share the borders and all should come to one common understanding"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government","Most or all relevant Local Level Governments are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0,"The current local level governements are not sure or do not fully understand.","What is needed?"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level","Most or all of the relevant District level representatives are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0,"Verbally speaking but do not know the actual boundary","Incorporation of ILG"]
["Planning","7. Management planning","Is there a management plan or similar and is it being implemented?","A.  There is no management plan for the protected area, or the management plan was produced a long time ago and is not being implemented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!B62:D67,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E22,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan","The management planning process for the protected area provides adequate and equal opportunity for key people (i.e. includes government, NGO, business etc) to have input into the management plan and to influence it (Do not include customary landowners in this question) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan","There is an established schedule and process for people to regularly review and update the management plan (i.e. including agreed vision, objectives, actions etc) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee","The Management Committee is formed and meets to discuss issues related to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Governance","7d. Are there clear decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee?","Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision making are clearly documented (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee","Are the structures and processes for decision-making in the protected area well understood?","A.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are not known or understood by the protected area owners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D27,Responses!B68:D73,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E27,Responses!C68:E73,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.25,0.75,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions","The decisions of the Management Committee/managers are made available to all people in the protected area community (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan","Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented?","A.  No regular work plan exists ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D29,Responses!B74:D79,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E29,Responses!C74:E79,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory","Do you have enough information to manage the area?","A.  There is little or no information available about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological process and cultural values) and this makes management difficult",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D30,Responses!B80:D85,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E30,Responses!C80:E85,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Some informaion on lakes, stones, plants,animals","More biodiversty and cultural studies to be carried out"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers","Are there enough people employed or paid to manage the protected area?","A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D31,Responses!B86:D91,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E31,Responses!C86:E91,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on the protected area","Are there enough unpaid people (community or customary landowners) helping to manage the protected area?","A.  There are no community members or customary landowners helping to manage the protected area, but they are needed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D32,Responses!B92:D972,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E32,Responses!C92:E972,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills","Do the people involved in managing the protected area have the necessary knowledge and skills?","A.  Knowledge and skills needed to manage the protected area are very poor or inadequate",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D33,Responses!B98:D103,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E33,Responses!C98:E103,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"Local knowledge is there but need scientifc knowledge to be taught to the local people - what in particular?"]
["Input","12. Current budget","Is the current budget sufficient (from any source)?","A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D34,Responses!B104:D109,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E34,Responses!C104:E109,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ","Is the budget secure (e.g. over the next 2-5 years)?","A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D35,Responses!B110:D115,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E35,Responses!C110:E115,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ","Is the budget managed to meet important management needs?","A.  Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines management effectiveness ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D36,Responses!B116:D121,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E36,Responses!C116:E121,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F36=\"NA\",\" \",F36*H36)","v":0},"This response is probably not relevant - as there is no budget - consider changing.","What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities sufficient for management needs?","A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D37,Responses!B122:D127,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E37,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities adequately maintained?","A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D38,Responses!B128:D133,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E38,Responses!C128:E133,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F38=\"NA\",\" \",F38*H38)","v":0},"This response is probably not relevant - as there is equipment etc - consider changing.","What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","16. Law enforcement","Can people (e.g. rangers or customary landowners – those with responsibility for managing the area) enforce protected area rules well enough?","A.  There is no effective human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D39,Responses!B134:D139,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E39,Responses!C134:E139,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Now it is not a protected area but later when it is protected then human training on conservation will have to be conducted. This actually refers to existing rules that are in place relating to cutting of trees, hunting etc - so can relevant people enforce these rules?","What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement","How good is the coordination between the protected area Management Committee/managers and other groups who assist with law enforcement?","A.  There is no coordination",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D40,Responses!B140:D145,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E40,Responses!C140:E145,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Currently it is not exercised as this area is not a protected area therefore consevation rules and regulations are not carried out.","What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes","Are there process to solve disputes related to the protected area, and do people know about these processes?","D. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known and anyone who wants to see and review/discuss this information is able to do so",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D41,Responses!B146:D151,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E41,Responses!C146:E151,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.5,1.5,1.5,"Main disputes such as land, plants - Sorted out at the village court; land mediators village court magistrates","Document process on solving the conflict or disputes."]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process","How suitable are the processes for resolving disputes or disagreements related to the protected area?","B.  Dispute resolution processes are not suitable for solving protected area-related disputes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D42,Responses!B152:D157,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E42,Responses!C152:E157,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,null,"PA environment  law system for solving disputes has to connect with local level  government law systems for resolutions to be agreed upon in the best way."]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ","How often do dispute resolution processes succeed in resolving protected area-related disputes?","C. Most disputes are resolved, but often there are some people who remain dissatisfied",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D43,Responses!B158:D163,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E43,Responses!C158:E163,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,0.5,"Bribery is  common during solving conflicts or disputes these days.","Village court and enforcers, lands mediation team need to be trained on the environment rules, regulations and law to resolve disputes correctly."]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers","Are incidents of law breaking dealt with according to the rules/ law/ regulations?","C. Most incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but there are occasional irregularities",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D44,Responses!B164:D169,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E44,Responses!C164:E169,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"Village court always solve disputes but once in a while go out of line.","What is needed?"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers","All people are treated equally in relation to charges/prosecution for breaching protected area rules/laws/regulations (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"Our children went to the forest and collected the plant ferns and were told by the rangers to pay but if the rangers saw their family, relatives and tourists do that then they let them go'","Give the rangers power to penalise people - train the rangers on environment rules and laws -do/carry out more environmental awareness in the communities"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness","Are systems (e.g. patrols, permits, signage etc) in place to control access by ‘outsiders’ and resource use in the protected area ","A.    Protection systems/law enforcement (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but are required",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D46,Responses!B170:D175,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E46,Responses!C170:E175,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No rangers at the moment - not a protected area yet -","Need to have rangers based at the site to patrol the proposed protected area."]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents","If people know of a threat to the protected area do they report this to the Management Committee/ authority?","C.    Most times it is reported, although sometimes not",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D47,Responses!B176:D181,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E47,Responses!C72:E77,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,null,"Have strong or severe laws in place to stop people to collect this - more awareness to be carried out"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety","Do protected area staff/people doing work or looking after the area have safe working conditions and does management prioritise safety? ","A.     The working environment for staff and community members is very poor",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D48,Responses!B182:D187,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E48,Responses!C182:E187,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","19. Research ","Is there a programme of management-orientated survey, inventory and research work?","B.     There is some survey, inventory or research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D49,Responses!B188:D193,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E49,Responses!C188:E193,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"WCS research on wildlife studies and biodiversity once in a while","What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","20. Monitoring and evaluation (of management activities)","Are management activities monitored, evaluated and acted on (or adapted)?","A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D50,Responses!B194:D199,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E50,Responses!C194:E199,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Process","21. Resource management ","Is active resource management of biodiversity and cultural activities (e.g. gardens, fishing areas, resource extraction sites) being undertaken?","A.  There is no active resource management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values, but it is needed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D51,Responses!B200:D205,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E51,Responses!C200:E205,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Currently not a Protected Area","Proper land use and resource management planning needed"]
["Process","22. Climate change ","Is the protected area consciously managed to adapt to climate change?","A.  There have been no efforts to consider adaptation to climate change in management of the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D52,Responses!B206:D211,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E52,Responses!C206:E211,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F52=\"NA\",\" \",F52*H52)","v":0},"Re-planting of trees-  Stop bush fires","More awareness to be carried out planting of tress and stop bush fires"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to prevent carbon loss?","B.  Preventing carbon loss has been considered in general terms, but is not reflected in management of the protected area ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D53,Responses!B212:D217,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E53,Responses!C212:E217,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F53=\"NA\",\" \",F53*H53)","v":0.5},"Are told to do selective tree cutting and so the remaining forest is left intact to absorb carbon","What is needed?"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to encourage carbon storage?","B.  Carbon storage has been considered in general terms, but is not significantly reflected in management of the protected area ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D54,Responses!B218:D223,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E54,Responses!C218:E223,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F54=\"NA\",\" \",F54*H54)","v":0.5},"Are told to do selective tree cutting and so the remaining forest is left intact to absorb carbon and the trees store carbon","Pigs to be put in a fence so that they do not disturb the re-growth of trees"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known","The ecosystem services provided by the protected area are well known (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,{"$f":"IF(F55=\"NA\",\" \",F55*H55)","v":0.5},"Clean water,fresh air, trees prevent erosion, plants provide food, fibre, medicine, bulding materials, traditional bilas materials obatined such as bird feathers, bark, for tradtional ceremonies","Carry out more ecosystem studies"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ","Does management of the protected area take into account actions to enhance the protected area’s provision of ecosystem services?","A.     No ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D56,Responses!B224:D229,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E56,Responses!C224:E229,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Maybe reconsider this as people report that there are rules on hunting, cutting trees etc - presumably to protect ecosystem values??",null,null,"NA"]
["Process","25. Education and awareness ","Is there a planned education and awareness programme about the protected area and linked to its objectives and needs?","C.   There is an education and awareness programme, but it only partly meets the needs of protected area management and could be improved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D57,Responses!B230:D235,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E57,Responses!C82:E87,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"During world environment day - community schools- tree planting activities.The district - sales of seedlings, herbs and various plants on display -awareness on tree planting to celebrate the day","Community program to run these environemental awareness as well which will disseminate and educate more information to the whole community"]
["Process","26. Government neighbours and commercial neighbour cooperation","Is there co-operation with adjacent government neighbours and commercial land/water users? ","A.    There is no contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D58,Responses!B236:D241,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E58,Responses!C83:E88,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,null,"What is needed?"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators","Do commercial tour operators cooperate and contribute to protected area management and provide benefits to the community?","C.  There is contact and limited co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide some benefits to the customary landowners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D59,Responses!B242:D247,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E59,Responses!C242:E247,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F59=\"NA\",\" \",F59*H59)","v":2},"A small payment is given to the carrires who carry the clothe and, some valuable things given by the tourists - 4 tracks in total- 3 tracks not formally recogized but only 1 track fomally recognised which is Mt Wilhem","Formalise the 3 current tracks"]
["Process","28. Fees","If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?","A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D60,Responses!B248:D253,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E60,Responses!C248:E253,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F60=\"NA\",\" \",F60*H60)","v":0},null,"What is needed?",null,"NA"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services","Are visitor facilities and services adequate?","C.  Visitor facilities and services are good – they meet the needs of the current visitor levels but could be improved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D61,Responses!B254:D259,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E61,Responses!C86:E91,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"Guest house facilities in good condition - cultural dances -tradtional food cooked and served. ARE these in the PA -a previous question said there were no facilities?"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners","Do customary landowners, who reside in or regularly use the protected area, have input into management decisions?","D.   Customary landowners fully participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, (e.g. outright ownership or co-management arrangement)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D62,Responses!B260:D265,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E62,Responses!C260:E265,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F62=\"NA\",\" \",F62*H62)","v":3},"Clan leaders, leaders and representaives from each clan represetning clans on land issues - man are the ones that do the most decisions - this days women empowerment (NOT sure what this means - can you please explain the role of women in decision making)","include more in decision and strengthen this - women empowerment"]
["Process","31. Local communities and others with access or user ‘rights’","Do local communities and other rights’ holders living in or near the protected area, have input into relevant management decisions?","B.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have some input into discussions relating to the management of the protected area, but no direct role in management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D63,Responses!B266:D271,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E63,Responses!C88:E93,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"People residing outside from their villages still have the right to make decisions for their land land as rightful customary land owners. Girls are married outside but if they are next of kin then they can make decisions- Men are the common decision makers, but this depends on each family."]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to the protected area","What percentage of women in the protected area community are involved in decision making about the protected area?","A.     Very few (less than 25%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D64,Responses!B272:D277,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E64,Responses!C89:E94,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.25,0.75,0,"Men are common decision makers during a community meeting or gathering. Women influence men at home with some decisions which the men discuss during the meeting.","Gender balance "]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of protected area decisions","Women are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Mt Wihelm has men rangers only -Most decsions at home or as a  community is only made by men","Equal compostion of memders on the management committee -Employment of men and women rangers in the protected area -include women in the council and leadership roles"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making","How much influence do women have on protected-area related decisions?","B.     Women have a small influence on protected area decisions ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D66,Responses!B278:D283,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E66,Responses!C278:E283,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"(1) Cultural barrier within the community (2) Level of education (3) Biblical influence ","More training and education made available for women and girls"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of protected area decisions","Young people (under 20 years of age) are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Youth voices are heard during a community gathering and their opinions are taken into consideration and weighed out."]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making","How much influence do young people (under 20 years of age) have on protected-area related decisions?","C.    Young people can often influence protected area decisions",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D68,Responses!B284:D289,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E68,Responses!C93:E98,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,{"$f":"G68*H68","v":0.75},{"$f":"IF(F68=\"not relevant\",\" \",F68*H68)","v":0.5},"Youths with good character, reputation and have important opnions are considered.","1. Organised sports groups that are represented by the lead sportsman/woman. 2. Youths engaged with church activities also represent the youths."]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in the full range of protected area decisions ","There is opportunity for any person or group in the protected area and wider community to become involved in protected area decision making (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Landowners are the ones that participate whether they are outspoken or quiet and later the leaders come in to assist them.","Create an organising committee to represent everyone in the community."]
["Output","31g. There is communication and trust between the customary landowners and …","1. CEPA (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"UNDP GEF through Tony ","Communicated through Tony "]
["Output",null,"2. Provincial Government (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"Tony contacted the President  LLG Managress and  relayed the message","What is needed?"]
["Output",null,"3. Local Level Government (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Pesident and manger communicated with the ward councillors","What is needed?"]
["Output",null,"4.  District representatives (e.g. District Development Authority) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Pesident LLG Manageress communicated with the ward councillors","What is needed?"]
["Output",null,"5. Ward representatives (e.g. Ward Development Committee) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25," WardCouncillors communicated with the ward representatives","What is needed?"]
["Output",null,"6. NGOs (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,null,"What is needed?"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare","Programmes are being implemented to improve community/customary landowners’ welfare, while conserving protected area resources (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Get the ????  In Q32c there is a list of all the projects that have been implemented and many  of these would improve community welfare. Does this question need to be reconsidered?","Increase PA  boundary so that it covers all wards so that it benefits the communities and improves livelihoods of the people."]
["Output","31i. Level of support","The local community and customary landowners actively support the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Particpation and interest of the local community in their attendance of the worknshop now - toursim activities to benefit the local community","What is needed?"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits","Are the protected area and related conservation and development projects providing sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners, e.g. income/ employment?","A.  The protected area does not deliver any livelihood benefits to local communities/ customary landowners (no people benefit)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D78,Responses!B290:D295,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E78,Responses!C290:E295,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F78=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,0,"Improve boundary - Equal engagement of rangers from all areas","Improve boundary - Equal engagement of rangers from all the wards - market foot tracks to tourists so that they can choose "]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness","How effective are benefit-sharing arrangements in delivering benefits to all in the protected area?","A.  There are no benefit-sharing arrangements in place",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D79,Responses!B296:D301,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E79,Responses!C296:E301,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F79=\"NA\",\" \",F79*H79)","v":0},null,"What is needed?"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits","Are the livelihood benefits from the protected area equitably shared?","A.  The livelihood benefits provided by the protected area are not shared equitably by the local communities/customary landowners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D80,Responses!B302:D307,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E80,Responses!C302:E307,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.25,0.75,{"$f":"IF(F80=\"NA\",\" \",F80*H80)","v":0},null,"Benefit sharing agreement between all parties involved",null,"NA"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years","There has been an improvement in livelihood outcomes for the community over the past five years? (Y or N)","Yes",null,null,1,0.25,0.25,0,"Currently from WARD 12 -17 there are; 3 aid posts, 2 newly built schools and 1 old school,construction of roads to central location,access of water supply,communities are growing and selling potato, bulb onion, vegetables and individuals in the community are building their houses. Communites have some basic services and are benefiting.","Feeder roads to be improved and sealed, need roadsto be made to gardens to transport food. More tourist guest houses to be made and improvment of the foot tracks for trekking. Construction of community halls. Make market accessible for local farmers to encourge growth and sales of their vegetables."]
["Output","33. Threats","Are the threats to the main values of the protected area being effectively addressed?","B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D82,Responses!B308:D313,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E82,Responses!C108:E113,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Bush fires and habitat clearing are seen as managable through conducting awareness - coordination between all level of government, landslides, deliberate threats and activites to own land by landowners are seen as unmanagable.","1. Memorandum of agreement (MoA) and Memorandum of understanding (MoU) to be signed between all levels of government. 2.Encourage and supply tree seedlings to communities to stop erosion,more awareness and education to be carried out on cutting of trees. 3. Divert or change flow of water to another direction. 4. Bush fires - more awareness to stop people throwing broken glass in the grassland as it naturally creates fires, collect any broken glass seen or found in the grassland."]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)","Have the requirements for connectivity (i.e. direct linkages to other natural ecosystems) been assessed and implemented?","A.  The requirements for connectivity have not been assessed ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D83,Responses!B314:D319,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E83,Responses!C314:E319,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F83=\"NA\",\" \",F83*H83)","v":0},"As indicated above -please check this out re landscape connectivity role.","Studies need to be undertaken to identify connectiving and linkages between natural systems"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values","What is the condition of the important natural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","C.  Some natural values are being partly degraded, but the most important natural values have not been significantly impacted",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D84,Responses!B320:D325,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E84,Responses!C320:E325,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F84=\"NA\",\" \",F84*H84)","v":2},null,"What is needed?"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of natural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F85=\"NA\",\" \",F85*H85)","v":1},"Through  local observation during dry seasons by men from the village","Carry out baseline survey, document and monitor the natural values"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to natural values (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F86=\"NA\",\" \",F86*H86)","v":0},"The natural values include the floating boulder, heart shaped lake, everlasting/living water and dragon stone and there is no management of these values.","What is needed?"]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management","Activities to maintain natural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F87=\"NA\",\" \",F87*H87)","v":0},"An association was formed to  check one of the three foot tracks from the village to Mt Wihelm","Engage rangers from local organised groups to provide regular monitoring and checks"]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values","What is the condition of the important cultural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","B.  Some cultural values are being severely degraded ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D88,Responses!B326:D331,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E88,Responses!C326:E331,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"IF(F88=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,{"$f":"IF(F88=\"NA\",\" \",F88*H88)","v":1},"Cultural  values  such as the war relics of WW2 Are these historic values, rather than cultural values. Cultural values is about loss of Tok ples, failure to pass on traditional customs etc.","Put a fence around the war relics when it is protetced - Get speclist people like National Museum to come and do a check on the war relics "]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of cultural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,null,"1. Engage cultural study specilists to enstablishe baseline studies to set basis to carry monitoring. 2. Document oral history"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to cultural values (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Cultural  values  such as the war relics of WW2 ","Establish in-situ programmes"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values","Activities to maintain cultural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Cultural  values  such as the war relics of WW2 , traditional knowledge and practises","Document cultural values and oral history.  Put a fence around the war relics. Promote cultural dances to the tourists. Show case culture through education programs"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species","Has the status of key species changed over the last five (5) years?","A.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D92,Responses!B332:D337,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E92,Responses!C118:E123,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F92=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,0,"Decrease in cassowary numbers, endemic fern flowering plant","1.Community by-laws to regulate key species. 2. Have a conservation managemnt committee with mini management committee copsed of tribal groups to moitor key species. 3. Stop youths from using catapults for killing birds such as bird of paradise."]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats","Has the status of habitats changed over the last five (5) years?","A.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D93,Responses!B338:D343,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E93,Responses!C343:E348,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Grassland, Forest, Stone, Lakes and Alphine. When bush is cut for garden making then this causes the animals to migrate to other areas","1. Stop bush fires. 2. Stop cutting of trees.3. Land-use planning for small scale agriculture for settlements. 4. Community land-use agreement within the tribes."]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA","What support has CEPA provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","B.  A little",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D94,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E94,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.2,"Awareness and workshop trainings","1. Training to understand the importanance of biodiversity and they will be equiped to go out to their communities and educate them. 2. Documentation. 3. Liase with the relevant partners, NGOs, government agencies. 4.Process to establish the area to be gazetted so that it becomes a protected area and also the community can benefit."]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)","What support has/have the provincial government(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D95,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E95,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,null,"1. Establish a local conservation group and can connect with the Provincial  Governement. 2. Market the tracks to the public and tourists. 3. Rangers to be employed,paid and trained by the provincial government."]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)","What support has/have the District(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D96,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E96,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,null,"1. Establish a local conservation group and can connect with the Provincial  Governement. 2. Market the tracks to the public and tourists. 3. Rangers to be employed,paid and trained by the provincial government. 4. Some funding to be provided."]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)","What support has/have the LGG(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D97,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E97,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,null,"1. Law and order support.2. Awareness to be made. 3.Some funding to be provided."]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs","What support have NGOs provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","C.  Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D98,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E98,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.4,"WCS research on wildlife studies and biodiversity. Irrwomba Founation nursery tree seedlings and distributes, conducts awareness","1. Invite NGOs to particpate in community awareness on the environment.2. Request funding to transport and plant tree seedlings."]
[null,"TOTAL",null,null,null,{"$f":"SUM(F3:F98)","v":54},{"$f":"SUM(G3:G98)","v":224},null,{"$f":"SUM(I3:I98)","v":155.19999999999996},{"$f":"SUM(J3:J98)","v":33.5}]

{"sheet":"Responses","index":12,"n_rows":348,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":348,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Question",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Condition","Trend"]
[1,"select","blank","blank","select","blank",null,"Very good","Increasing"]
[null,"A. The protected area is not gazetted/approved by national or provincial government or has not been established through ‘other effective means’","A",0,"Yes",1,null,"Good","Stable"]
[null,"B. There is agreement that the protected area should be established but the process has not begun","B ",1,"No",0,null,"Fair","Decreasing"]
[null,"C. The protected area is in the process of being established, but the process is incomplete","C",2,"Not relevant","NA",null,"Poor","Don't know"]
[null,"D. The protected area has been formally gazetted/approved by the national or provincial government or established through ‘other effective means’","D",3,null,null,null,"Don't know"]
[]
[2,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area to guide management","A",0]
[null,"B. The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives","B ",1]
[null,"C. The protected area has agreed objectives, and is only partly managed according to these objectives","C",2,null,null,"research & monitoring"]
[null,"D. The protected area has agreed objectives and is fully managed to meet these objectives","D",3,null,null,"planning documents & government data"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"staff experience"]
[3,"select","blank","blank",null,null,"external expert opinion"]
[null,"A. There are no regulations or customary laws or agreements for managing land and marine use and activities in the protected area ","A",0,null,null,"customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
[null,"B. Some regulations or customary laws for managing land/sea use and activities in the protected area exist but there are many weaknesses","B ",1,null,null,"other (specify)"]
[null,"C. Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist, but there are some weaknesses or gaps","C",2]
[null,"D. Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management","D",3]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"threat severity"]
["3a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. Protected area-related rules/laws/regulations are not clearly defined and documented","A",0,null,null,"select"]
[null,"B. Some protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, but there are some important gaps","B ",1,null,null,"Very high"]
[null,"C. Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, with no important gaps","C",2,null,null,"High"]
[null,"D. Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented and anyone who wants to see/review/or know this information is able to do so","D",3,null,null,"Medium"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Low"]
["3b","select","blank","blank",null,null,"none"]
[null,"A. The customary landowners/local community do not have any protected area-related user/access rights relating to accessing resources from the protected area (i.e. ability to hunt, fish or gather)","A",0]
[null,"B. Some of the rights to use/access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented","C",2]
[null,"D. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, and anyone who wants to see or learn about this information is able to do so","D",3]
[]
["3c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[]
[4,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the needs of the protected area and the resulting land/sea uses and policies harm the protected area ","A",0]
[null,"B. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the long-term needs of the protected area, but the resulting land/sea uses do not harm the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area takes into account some of the long-term needs of the protected area, and the resulting land/sea uses partially support the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D. Planning for land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area fully takes into account the long-term needs of the protected area and seeks to support the protected area","D",3]
[]
[5,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), and this makes achieving the major management objectives very difficult ","A",0]
[null,"B.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), but we are working to make it better (e.g. agreements with adjacent land/sea owners for wildlife corridors, or improving water catchment management)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   The protected area size and boundaries (i.e. the design) are okay and allow us to achieve our objectives, but could be better (e.g. in relation to large-scale ecological processes or minimising threats)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Protected area size and the boundaries (i.e. the design) are very good and we can achieve our objectives","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["6a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   None or only a small section of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground ","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Most of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","C",2]
[null,"D.   All of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground (this could include a fence)","D",3]
[]
["6def","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[]
[7,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no management plan for the protected area, or the management plan was produced a long time ago and is not being implemented","A",0]
[null,"B.  A management plan or similar is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A management plan or similar exists but it is being partly implemented because of funding constraints or other problems","C",2]
[null,"D. A management plan or similar exists and is being fully implemented","D",3]
[]
["7e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are not known or understood by the protected area owners","A",0]
[null,"B.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are little known or understood by the protected area owners","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are mostly known and understood by the protected area owners","C",2]
[null,"D.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are fully known and understood by the protected area owners","D",3]
[]
[8,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  No regular work plan exists ","A",0]
[null,"B.  A regular work plan exists but only some of the activities are implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A regular work plan exists, and many activities are implemented","C",2]
[null,"D. A regular work plan exists, and all activities are implemented","D",3]
[]
[9,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no information available about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological process and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is poor information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is good Information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) for most areas of planning and decision making","C",2]
[null,"D. There is very good Information on the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) to support all areas of planning and decision making ","D",3]
[]
[10,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some paid staff/people who are responsible for important management activities, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. Paid staff numbers are good and support management of the protected area, but this is below what is required to meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. Paid staff/people numbers are very good and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
["10a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no community members or customary landowners helping to manage the protected area, but they are needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are a few people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is below what is required to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. There are plenty of people helping to manage the protected area and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
[11,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Knowledge and skills needed to manage the protected area are very poor or inadequate","A",0]
[null,"B.  Knowledge and skills are poor relative to the needs of the protected area","B ",1]
[null,"C. Knowledge and skills are good, but could be improved to better manage the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D. Knowledge and skills to manage the protected area are very good and they meet the management needs of the area","D",3]
[]
[12,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some money, but this is a serious problem that limits management effectiveness and should be increased to fully meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. The available budget is acceptable but could be increased to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. The available budget is sufficient and fully meets the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
[13,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is very little budget security, and the protected area could not meet its management needs without outside funding","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is a reasonably secure budget for regular operation of the protected area to enable it to meet its management needs, but many initiatives are reliant on outside funding","C",2]
[null,"D. There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs ","D",3]
[]
[14,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines management effectiveness ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Budget management is poor and constrains management effectiveness","B ",1]
[null,"C. Budget management is good but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D. Budget management is very good and meets management needs","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["15a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some equipment and facilities, but these are inadequate for most management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are sufficient equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake most management tasks, but there are some gaps","C",2]
[null,"D. There are very good equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake all management tasks","D",3]
[]
["15b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some occasional maintenance of equipment and facilities ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is much ongoing, basic maintenance of equipment and facilities ","C",2]
[null,"D. Equipment and facilities are fully maintained","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[16,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no effective human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are big gaps or deficiencies","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is acceptable human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are a few gaps or deficiencies","C",2]
[null,"D. There is excellent human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","D",3]
[]
["16a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no coordination","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some effort to coordinate, but this does not work well","B ",1]
[null,"C. Coordination is good, but with some occasional problems","C",2]
[null,"D. Coordination is very good","D",3]
[]
["16b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution and hence no documentation","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known","C",2]
[null,"D. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known and anyone who wants to see and review/discuss this information is able to do so","D",3]
[]
["16c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution","A",0]
[null,"B.  Dispute resolution processes are not suitable for solving protected area-related disputes","B ",1]
[null,"C. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for some protected area-related disputes, but not others","C",2]
[null,"D. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for most or all types of protected area-related disputes","D",3]
[]
["16d","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Almost never as very few people are aware of the processes and are able to use them","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some disputes are resolved (e.g. up to one-third of disputes), but most remain unresolved","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most disputes are resolved, but often there are some people who remain dissatisfied","C",2]
[null,"D. Almost all disputes are resolved and normally all people in the dispute are satisfied with the outcome","D",3]
[]
["16e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Prosecution/dealing with law often does not follow the rules/law/regulations","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but irregularities are common","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but there are occasional irregularities","C",2]
[null,"D. All incidents are properly handled according to the rules/law/regulations","D",3]
[]
[17,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Protection systems/law enforcement (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but are required","A",0]
[null,"B.    Protection systems/law enforcement are partially effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but law breaking is still common","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Protection systems/law enforcement are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, but there are still occasional cases of law breaking","C",2]
[null,"D.    Protection systems/law enforcement are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, so law breaking is very rare","D",3]
[]
["17a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    No – they keep quiet","A",0]
[null,"B.    Sometimes it is reported, but most times not","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most times it is reported, although sometimes not","C",2]
[null,"D.    Almost always reported in a timely manner, with very few exceptions","D",3]
[]
[18,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     The working environment for staff and community members is very poor","A",0]
[null,"B.     The working environment for staff and community members is poor ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The working environment for staff and community members is good, but improvements could be made","C",2]
[null,"D.    The working environment for staff and community members is very good as it is an important consideration for the protected area managers ","D",3]
[]
[19,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no survey, inventory or research work taking place in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some survey, inventory or research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is survey, inventory or research work but it is only partly directed towards the needs of protected area management ","C",2]
[null,"D.    There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey, inventory or research work, which is relevant to management needs","D",3]
[]
[20,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some unplanned and irregular monitoring and evaluation of the performance of management activities, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation, but results do not feed back into management","C",2]
[null,"D.    A good system of monitoring and evaluation exists, is well implemented and is used to adapt and improve management","D",3]
[]
[21,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no active resource management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values, but it is needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some active management of the protected area is being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. Many of the requirements for active management of the protected area are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed","C",2]
[null,"D. Requirements for active management of the protected area are being fully implemented","D",3]
[]
[22,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There have been no efforts to consider adaptation to climate change in management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some initial thought has taken place about likely impacts of climate change, but his has yet to be translated into management plans or actions","B ",1]
[null,"C. Limited plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, which may or may not be implemented.","C",2]
[null,"D. Detailed plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, and these are already being implemented. ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["23a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Preventing carbon loss has not been considered in protected area management","A",0]
[null,"B.  Preventing carbon loss has been considered in general terms, but is not reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures to prevent carbon loss","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to prevent carbon loss","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["23b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Carbon storage has not been considered in management of the protected area.","A",0]
[null,"B.  Carbon storage has been considered in general terms, but is not significantly reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["24a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     No ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed","A",0]
[null,"B.    A few ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","C",2]
[null,"D.    All ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","D",3]
[]
[25,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","A",0]
[null,"B.    There is a limited and irregular education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","B ",1]
[null,"C.   There is an education and awareness programme, but it only partly meets the needs of protected area management and could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   There is an appropriate and effective education and awareness programme linked to achieving the protected area’s objectives and needs","D",3]
[]
[26,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users but only some cooperation on management","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, but only some co-operation on management","C",2]
[null,"D. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, and substantial (or full) co-operation on management","D",3]
[]
[27,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no contact between the Management Committee/ managers and tourism operators using the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the protected area Management Committee/managers and tourism operators, and this is confined largely to administrative or regulatory matters, with few benefits to the customary landowners","B ",1]
[null,"C.  There is contact and limited co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide some benefits to the customary landowners","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is contact and good co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide long-term benefits to the customary landowners","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[28,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected","A",0]
[null,"B.    Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its surroundings","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","C",2]
[null,"D.   Fees are collected and make a good contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[29,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need","A",0]
[null,"B.  Visitor facilities and services are poor - they do not meet the needs of current visitor levels ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Visitor facilities and services are good – they meet the needs of the current visitor levels but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.  Visitor facilities and services are very good for current levels of visitation","D",3]
[]
[30,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Customary landowners have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Customary landowners have some input into discussions relating to management, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Customary landowners directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Customary landowners fully participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, (e.g. outright ownership or co-management arrangement)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[31,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have some input into discussions relating to the management of the protected area, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ contribute to some relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, e.g. co-management","D",3]
[]
["31a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.     Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.    Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["31c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Women have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.     Women have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Women can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Women are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[]
["31e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Young people (under 20 years of age) have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.    Young people have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Young people can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Young people are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[]
[32,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The protected area does not deliver any livelihood benefits to local communities/ customary landowners (no people benefit)","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects exist, but are not significant contributors to livelihoods (only a few people benefit)","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects make a moderate contribution to livelihoods (many people benefit)","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is a major flow of sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners from activities associated with the protected area (most people benefit)","D",3]
[]
["32a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no benefit-sharing arrangements in place","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits have been received, but they are much less than what was decided","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits have been received, but they are less than what was decided","C",2]
[null,"D.  Benefits have been received and they are fully in line with, or even better than what was decided","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["32b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The livelihood benefits provided by the protected area are not shared equitably by the local communities/customary landowners","A",0]
[null,"B.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitable among only some groups and individuals in the local communities/ customary landowners ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among most groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","C",2]
[null,"D.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among all groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[33,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The threats to the main values are not being addressed by management","A",0]
[null,"B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Most of the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","C",2]
[null,"D.  All the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","D",3]
[]
[34,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The requirements for connectivity have not been assessed ","A",0]
[null,"B.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed but necessary actions have not been taken","B ",1]
[null,"C.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and some actions have been taken, but not sufficient to achieve functional connectivity","C",2]
[null,"D.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and necessary actions have been taken to achieve functional connectivity","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[35,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important natural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some natural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some natural values are being partly degraded, but the most important natural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Natural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[36,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important cultural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some cultural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some cultural values are being partly degraded, but the most important cultural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Cultural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[37,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable, but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of key species is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[38,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of habitats is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["39abcde","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  None","A",0]
[null,"B.  A little","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some","C",2]
[null,"D.  Sufficient","D",3]

{"sheet":"ConditTrend (T9)","index":13,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,4]]}
["Detailed assessment of values (Condition & Trend) (Table 9)"]
["Key value ","Condition","Trend","Justification for the rating","Ways to improve the value",null,"Condition"]
["Values will be inserted from Table 3","Insert Score ","Insert Score","Insert text to explain the score or rating that was selected",null,null,"VG"]
[null,"Select from pull down menu","Select from pull down menu",null,null,null,"G"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Biodiversity "},"Very good","Stable","Local knowledge that the biodiversity is in good state","Protect alphine grassland and plains, plants and wildlife",null,"F"]
["Floating stone","Very good","Stable","Local knowledged that the floating stone is in good condition","Area to be protected under conservation - certain restrictions to be put in place - distance - control glass thrown in the grassland that causes bush fires",null,"P"]
["Dragon stone (teme kombuglo)","Very good","Stable","Local knowledged that the dragone stone is in good condition","Area to be protected under conservation - certain restrictions to be put in place - distance - control glass thrown in the grassland that causes bush fires"]
["Heart Lake (Nigltekepangua)","Fair","Don't know","Local knowledge of some changes- plant grew in the lake and the color was red previously - but now the plant has died and color has changed to normal water color as when more people frequent the area","Lessen number of people going to the lake-bush fires to be controlled - will increase wild ducks",null,"DK"]
["War relics","Poor","Decreasing","The relics have been moved by the youths of the village. There have been disputes over the reclics. The youths believe that there are arms there left by the Japnese or Germans during WW2. So what is the dispute?","Put a boundary around the area to protect relics - engage National Museum Centre",null,"Score"]
["Living or everlasting water (Kornumbun)","Good","Stable","Sacred site so only chosen people can go there. From up close the water is covered by boulders and there is a small opening for the water to flow out. Wild ducks can be found here. Water drunk from the site can make one live longer, stay younger and it has healing properties as well.","Lessen number of people going to the lake-bush fires to be controlled- stop hunting near the area - re-direct the track away from the water",null,"I"]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"S"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"D"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"DK"]

{"sheet":"Recomm (T10)","index":14,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["Recommendations (Table 10)"]
["Recommendations",1,2,3,4,5,6]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone"},"CEPA as the national government agency to provide, support and work together with the local communities to gazette the proposed area.","3 Arms of government (Chimbu Provincial govt, Kundiawa Gembolg, District Development Authority -under MP leadership","To establish and support sub committees for each of the 6 wards to lead conservation work on the ground."]

{"sheet":"Str & Challenges (T11)","index":15,"n_rows":11,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":11,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["Strengths and Challenges (Table 11)"]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone"},{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone"}]
["Strengths","Challenges"]
["The local communities from the six wards are fully in support of the idea of conservation. They are passionate about their environment and want it to be managed sustainably to benefit the current population and their children.","Maintaining the values of their protected area against the emerging market demands e.g. the flowering fern plant which is in demand  and is bought at a very high price."]
["The proposed area boundary is adjacent to the current Mt Wihelm Protected Area so there is a potential to extend the Mt Wihelm PA boundary into the Kuglkane Ranges Protected Zone.","To get the different landowning clans to come to an agreement for conservation.","Clarify the challenge -does it mean that some prefer alternative forms of development??? Just need to clarify this."]
["There are four existing walking tracks that can be fully recognised and utilised by tourists. This can generate income for the locals and be a coservation incentive.","Get the four tracks fully recognised by tour operators.","To someone who is unfamiliar with the site, this is not clear. So please write a few more details. What is the challenge - lack of money, lack of willingness ????"]
["Natural values remain in a good condition????"]
["Cultural values are important and are passed onto future generations"]
["Customary rules and agreements are in place and this helps to maintain the natural and cultural values of the area."]
[]
["Please go through the text and try to select a few more strengths."]

{"sheet":"GEF METT","index":16,"n_rows":164,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":164,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[162,1,162,4],[162,5,162,6],[163,1,163,4],[163,5,163,6],[159,1,159,4],[159,5,159,6],[160,1,160,4],[160,5,160,6],[161,1,161,4],[161,5,161,6],[155,0,155,6],[156,0,156,6],[157,1,157,4],[157,5,157,6],[158,1,158,4],[158,5,158,6],[150,1,150,6],[128,1,128,6],[130,1,130,6],[132,1,132,6],[134,1,134,6],[136,1,136,6],[138,1,138,6],[140,1,140,6],[142,1,142,6],[144,1,144,6],[146,1,146,6],[148,1,148,6],[126,1,126,6],[104,1,104,6],[106,1,106,6],[108,1,108,6],[110,1,110,6],[112,1,112,6],[114,1,114,6],[116,1,116,6],[118,1,118,6],[120,1,120,6],[122,1,122,6],[124,1,124,6],[102,1,102,6],[80,1,80,6],[82,1,82,6],[84,1,84,6],[86,1,86,6],[88,1,88,6],[90,1,90,6],[92,1,92,6],[94,1,94,6],[96,1,96,6],[98,1,98,6],[100,1,100,6],[78,1,78,6],[59,1,59,5],[60,1,60,5],[61,1,61,5],[62,1,62,5],[63,1,63,5],[64,1,64,5],[65,1,65,5],[66,1,66,5],[71,0,71,6],[74,1,74,6],[76,1,76,6],[58,1,58,5],[47,0,47,6],[48,1,48,5],[49,1,49,5],[50,1,50,5],[51,1,51,5],[52,1,52,5],[53,1,53,5],[54,1,54,5],[55,1,55,5],[56,1,56,5],[57,1,57,5],[46,0,46,6],[0,0,2,6],[3,0,3,6],[4,0,4,6],[5,0,5,6],[6,0,6,6],[8,0,8,6],[9,0,10,0],[9,1,9,5],[9,6,10,6],[34,0,34,6],[35,0,35,6]]}
["Tracking Tool for GEF-6 Biodiversity Projects"]
[]
[]
["GEF:6 Objective 1: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems"]
["SECTION II: Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool for Protected Areas "]
["Note: Please complete the management effectiveness tracking tool for EACH protected area that is the target of the GEF intervention to improve management effectiveness and create a new worksheet for each.\n\nStructure and content of the Tracking Tool - Objective 1. Section II:\nThe Tracking Tool has five data sheets:\nData Sheet 1: Records details of the assessment and some basic information about the site, such as name, size and location etc. \nData Sheet 2: Provides a specific list of threats that the project is addressing.\nData Sheet 3: Condition of biodiversity in the protected area.\nData Sheet 4: Assessment Form: the assessment is structured around 30 questions presented in table format which includes three columns for recording details of the assessment, all of which should be completed.\nData Sheet 5: Datasources and methods on which above assessments of condition of biodiversity in the protected area in Question 30 are based."]
["PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TOOL IS FOR USE ONLY IN GEF-6 PROJECTS"]
[]
["Data Sheet 1: Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites"]
["Questions","Please indicate your answers here",null,null,null,null,"Notes"]
[null,"Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion"]
["Name, affiliation and contact details for person responsible for completing the METT (email etc.)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C75","v":"Alu Kaiye"},null,null,null,null,"Please insert from Attributes Table 1, Q28a"]
["Date assessment carried out",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C81","v":"28th - 30th September 2021"},null,null,null,null,"Month DD, YYYY (e.g., May 12, 2010)"]
["Name of protected area",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Kuglkane Ranges Proteced Zone"},null,null,{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!C5","v":0},{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!D5","v":0}]
["WDPA site code (these codes can be found on www.protectedplanet.net)",{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!B6","v":"xxx"}]
["Country",{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!B3","v":"Papua New Guinea"}]
["Location of protected area (province and if possible map reference)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C6","v":"Simbu"}]
["Date of establishment ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C13","v":"The site has not been formally established"}]
["Ownership details (please choose 1-4) ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C25","v":"Customary landowners"},null,null,null,null,"1:  State\n2:  Private\n3:  Community\n4:  Other"]
["Management Authority",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C31","v":"Customary landowners"}]
["Size of protected area (ha)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C15","v":"Not known"}]
["Number of Permanent staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C37","v":"No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"}]
["Number of Temporary staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C38","v":"No, since it is a proposed area there are no staff"}]
["Annual budget (US$)  for recurrent (operational) funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C41","v":"No budget received from the government"}]
["Annual budget (US$) for project or other supplementary funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C44","v":"Nil"}]
["What are the main values for which the area is designated",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C48","v":"Biodiversity "},null,null,null,null,"Add other values listed in attributes,Table 1, Q22."]
["List the two primary protected area management objectives in below:  "]
["Management objective 1",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C55","v":"Protect biodiveristy ; important plants,animals and wildlife (eg; butterfly and orchids)"}]
["Management objective 2",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C56","v":"Protect forest for cultural places and practises"}]
["No. of people involved in completing assessment",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C64","v":6}]
["Including: (please choose 1-8)",null,null,null,null,null,"1:  PA manager \n2:  PA staff\n3:  Other PA agency staff   \n4:  Donors\n5:  NGOs\n6: External experts\n7: Local community\n8: Other "]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 2: Key Biodiversity Indicators Used in This Protected Area"]
["At project start-up, identify and list up to five key biodiversity indicators that are monitored on a regular basis in the protected area; these indicators can relate to any/all trophic levels OR using other indicators. For each identified indicator, provide the current (project start-up) status of that indicator in numerical terms or with a short description (see examples below), as appropriate.   The examples are only illustrative and the protected area manager should use the indicators that currently are being monitored and/or will be monitored.\n\nAt project midterm and at project completion, provide updates on the status of the same indicator(s) identified at project start. \n\nThe overall condition of biodiversity -- based on the status of the indicator(s) identified here -- will be reported on in Question 30 in Data Sheet 4 (METT Assessment Form).  Therefore the inputs here require focused analysis to assess whether trends are positive, negative or neutral."]
["Indicator","Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion","Comments (optional)"]
["Example Indicator 1: Degree of soil compaction and/or erosion, as indicated by test sites compared with exclosures \nExample Indicator 2: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year, as indicated by plotting GPS points following fire events\nExample Indicator 3: Total area deforested or with forest significantly degraded, as indicated by satellite imagery\nExample Indicator 4: Estimated population of a key herbivore species as indicated by dung counts\nExample Indicator 5: Estimated population of a key carnivore species as indicated by camera traps \n","23 hectares",null,null,"35 hectares","50 hectares"]
["Indicator 1"]
["Indicator 2"]
["Indicator 3"]
["Indicator 4"]
["Indicator 5"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 3: Protected Areas Threats"]
["Please describe each threat that the project is directly addressing and provide the threat reduction indicator that the project is using from the project logframe to measure progress in reducing each threat.  An example is provided.   "]
["Questions","Please enter your answers in this column.",null,null,null,null,"Comments (optional)"]
["Example Threat","Illegal hunting for bushmeat"]
["Threat reduction indicator","Quantity of bushmeant coming from Xanadu PA sold in markets"]
["Baseline status"," At the start of project bushmeat sales in markets are 20 tons/per year (baseline upon which progress will be measured)."]
["Target","Quantities of bushmeat coming from \"Xanadu Protected Area\" sold in markets are reduced by 70% over the project period"]
["Midterm status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 14 tons per year."]
["End of project status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 12 tons per year."]
["Threat 1"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
["Threat 2"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 4: METT Assessment Form"]
["Please select a score from the drop-down list for each question. If a question is not applicable, then do not select a score and enter \"N/A\" in the comments space along with a brief explanation. "]
["Questions","Project start-up","Justification","Actions to improve management","Midterm","Project Completion","Criteria and Scores"]
["1. Legal status: Does the protected area have legal status (or in the case of private reserves is covered by a covenant or similar)? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K3","v":"Area is outside of Mt Wilhelm National Park. The community are now deciding to protect the area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L3","v":"So what needs to happen next?"},null,null,"0: The protected area is not gazetted/covenanted\n1: There is agreement that the protected area should be gazetted/covenanted but the process has not yet begun\n2: The protected area is in the process of being gazetted/covenanted but the process is still incomplete (includes sites designated under international conventions, such as Ramsar, or local/traditional law such as community conserved areas, which do not yet have national legal status or covenant)\n3: The protected area has been formally gazetted/covenanted"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["2. Protected area regulations: Are appropriate regulations in place to control land use and activities (e.g. hunting)?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K4","v":"It is not a gazetted protected area yet."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L4","v":"So what needs to happen next?"},null,null,"0: There are no regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area \n1: Some regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but these are major weaknesses\n2: Regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but there are some weaknesses or gaps\n3: Regulations for controlling inappropriate land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["3. Law \nEnforcement: Can staff (i.e. those with responsibility for managing the site) enforce protected area rules well enough?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K39","v":"Now it is not a protected area but later when it is protected then human training on conservation will have to be conducted. This actually refers to existing rules that are in place relating to cutting of trees, hunting etc - so can relevant people enforce these rules?"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L39","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: The staff have no effective capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations \n1: There are major deficiencies in staff capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations (e.g. lack of skills, no patrol budget, lack of institutional support)\n2: The staff have acceptable capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations but some deficiencies remain\n3: The staff have excellent capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["4. Protected area objectives: Is management undertaken according to agreed objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K4","v":"It is not a gazetted protected area yet."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L4","v":"So what needs to happen next?"},null,null,"0: No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area \n1: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives\n2: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is only partially managed according to these objectives\n3: The protected area has agreed objectives and is managed to meet these objectives"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["5. Protected area design: Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecological processes and water catchments of key conservation concern?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":3},1,{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L13","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: Inadequacies in protected area design mean achieving the major objectives of the protected area is very difficult\n1: Inadequacies in protected area design mean that achievement of major objectives is difficult but some mitigating actions are being taken (e.g. agreements with adjacent land owners for wildlife corridors or introduction of appropriate catchment management)\n2: Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes)\n3: Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["6. Protected area boundary demarcation: \nIs the boundary known and demarcated?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K14","v":"Using natural features as boundaries such as rivers and ranges"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L14","v":"GPS coordinates to be used as marke the boundary clearly FIX this"},null,null,"0: The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users\n1: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users \n2: The boundary of the protected area is known by both the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated\n3: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7. Management plan: Is there a management plan and is it being implemented?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K22","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L22","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is no management plan for the protected area\n1: A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented\n2: A management plan exists but it is only being partially implemented because of funding constraints or other problems\n3: A management plan exists and is being implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.a Planning process: The planning process allows adequate opportunity for key stakeholders to influence the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K23","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L23","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.b Planning process: There is an established schedule and process for periodic review and updating of the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K24","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L24","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.c Planning process: The results of monitoring, research and evaluation are routinely incorporated into planning ",null,null,null,null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["8. Regular work plan: Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L29","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No regular work plan exists \n1: A regular work plan exists but few of the activities are implemented\n2: A regular work plan exists and many activities are implemented\n3: A regular work plan exists and all activities are implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["9. Resource inventory: Do you have enough information to manage the area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K30","v":"Some informaion on lakes, stones, plants,animals"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L30","v":"More biodiversty and cultural studies to be carried out"},null,null,"0: There is little or no information available on the critical habitats, species and cultural values of the protected area \n1: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is not sufficient to support planning and decision making\n2: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is sufficient for most key areas of planning and decision making \n3: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  of the protected area is sufficient to support all areas of planning and decision making "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["10. Protection systems: \nAre systems in place to control access/resource use in the protected area?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K46","v":"No rangers at the moment - not a protected area yet -"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L46","v":"Need to have rangers based at the site to patrol the proposed protected area."},null,null,"0: Protection systems (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/resource use\n1: Protection systems are only partially effective in controlling access/resource use\n2: Protection systems are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use \n3: Protection systems are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/ resource use \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["11. Research: Is there a programme of management-orientated survey and research work?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K51","v":"Currently not a Protected Area"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L51","v":"Proper land use and resource management planning needed"},null,null,"0: There is no survey or research work taking place in the protected area\n1: There is a small amount of survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management\n2: There is considerable survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management \n3:There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey and research work, which is relevant to management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["12. Resource management: Is active resource management being undertaken?",null,null,null,null,null,"0: Active resource management is not being undertaken \n1: Very few of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  are being implemented\n2: Many of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed\n3: Requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being substantially or fully implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["13. Staff numbers: Are there enough people employed to manage the protected area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L31","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There are no staff  \n1: Staff numbers are inadequate for critical management activities\n2: Staff numbers are below optimum level for critical management activities\n3: Staff numbers are adequate for the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["14. Staff training: Are staff adequately trained to fulfill management objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K33","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L33","v":"Local knowledge is there but need scientifc knowledge to be taught to the local people - what in particular?"},null,null,"0: Staff lack the skills needed for protected area management\n1: Staff training and skills are low relative to the needs of the protected area\n2: Staff training and skills are adequate, but could be further improved to fully achieve the objectives of management\n3: Staff training and skills are aligned with the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["15. Current budget: Is the current budget sufficient?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L34","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is no budget for management of the protected area\n1: The available budget is inadequate for basic management needs and presents a serious constraint to the capacity to manage\n2: The available budget is acceptable but could be further improved to fully achieve effective management\n3: The available budget is sufficient and meets the full management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["16. Security of budget: Is the budget secure?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L35","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is no secure budget for the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding  \n1: There is very little secure budget and the protected area could not function adequately without outside funding \n2: There is a reasonably secure core budget for regular operation of the protected area but many innovations and initiatives are reliant on outside funding\n3: There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["17. Management of budget: Is the budget managed to meet critical management needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K36","v":"This response is probably not relevant - as there is no budget - consider changing."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L36","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines effectiveness (e.g. late release of budget in financial year)\n1: Budget management is poor and constrains effectiveness\n2: Budget management is adequate but could be improved\n3: Budget management is excellent and meets management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["18. Equipment: Is equipment sufficient for management needs?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L37","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs\n1: There are some equipment and facilities but these are inadequate for most management needs\n2: There are equipment and facilities, but still some gaps that constrain management\n3: There are adequate equipment and facilities "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["19. Maintenance of equipment: Is equipment adequately maintained?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K38","v":"This response is probably not relevant - as there is equipment etc - consider changing."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L38","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is little or no maintenance of equipment and facilities\n1: There is some ad hoc maintenance of equipment and facilities \n2: There is basic maintenance of equipment and facilities \n3: Equipment and facilities are well maintained"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["20. Education and awareness: Is there a planned education programme linked to the objectives and needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K57","v":"During world environment day - community schools- tree planting activities.The district - sales of seedlings, herbs and various plants on display -awareness on tree planting to celebrate the day"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L57","v":"Community program to run these environemental awareness as well which will disseminate and educate more information to the whole community"},null,null,"0: There is no education and awareness programme\n1: There is a limited and ad hoc education and awareness programme \n2: There is an education and awareness programme but it only partly meets needs and could be improved\n3: There is an appropriate and fully implemented education and awareness programme "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21. Planning for land and water use: Does land and water use planning recognise the protected area and aid the achievement of objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K9","v":"Animals are hunted for food and to sustain the livelihood of the people in the community. However, the rules and regulations of the proposed protected area are not fully understood by the community (SO WHAT? - are others hunting in the proposed PA???). Also plants are taken by tourists, locals or other people as they do not consider the rules of Mt Wilhelm."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L9","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: Adjacent land and water use planning does not take into account the needs of the protected area and activities/policies are detrimental to the survival of the area \n1: Adjacent land and water use planning does not  takes into account the long term needs of the protected area, but activities are not detrimental the area \n2: Adjacent land and water use planning partially takes into account the long term needs of the protected area\n3: Adjacent land and water use planning fully takes into account the long term needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation: Planning and management in the catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provision for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. volume, quality and timing of water flow, air pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats.",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K10","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L10","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21b. Land and water planning for connectivity: Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (e.g. to allow migratory fish to travel between freshwater spawning sites and the sea, or to allow animal migration).",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K11","v":"Can you please check this answer. Isn't a prime puirpose of the proposed PA to extend the area given protection and to form a landscape corridor - hence planning for connectivity is very important here - BUT I may have this wrong - please check."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L11","v":0},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation:  \"Planning adresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (e.g. volume, quality and timing of freshwater flow to sustain particular species, fire management to maintain savannah habitats etc.)\"",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K12","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L12","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["22. State and commercial neighbours:Is there co-operation with adjacent land and water users? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K58","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L58","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is no contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users\n1: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users but little or no cooperation\n2: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation \n3: There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["23. Indigenous people: Do indigenous and traditional peoples resident or regularly using the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K62","v":"Clan leaders, leaders and representaives from each clan represetning clans on land issues - man are the ones that do the most decisions - this days women empowerment (NOT sure what this means - can you please explain the role of women in decision making)"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L62","v":"include more in decision and strengthen this - women empowerment"},null,null,"0: Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24. Local communities: Do local communities resident or near the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K63","v":"People residing outside from their villages still have the right to make decisions for their land land as rightful customary land owners. Girls are married outside but if they are next of kin then they can make decisions- Men are the common decision makers, but this depends on each family."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L63","v":0},null,null,"0: Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Local communities directly contribute to some relevant  decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 a. Impact on communities: There is open communication and trust between local and/or  indigenous people, stakeholders and protected area managers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K70","v":"UNDP GEF through Tony "},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L70","v":"Communicated through Tony "},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 b. Impact on communities: Programmes to enhance community welfare, while conserving protected area resources, are being implemented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K76","v":"Get the ????  In Q32c there is a list of all the projects that have been implemented and many  of these would improve community welfare. Does this question need to be reconsidered?"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L76","v":"Increase PA  boundary so that it covers all wards so that it benefits the communities and improves livelihoods of the people."},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 c. Impact on communities: Local and/or indigenous people actively support the protected area",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K77","v":"Particpation and interest of the local community in their attendance of the worknshop now - toursim activities to benefit the local community"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L77","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["25. Economic benefit: Is the protected area providing economic benefits to local communities, e.g. income, employment, payment for environmental services?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K78","v":"Improve boundary - Equal engagement of rangers from all areas"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L78","v":"Improve boundary - Equal engagement of rangers from all the wards - market foot tracks to tourists so that they can choose "},null,null,"0: The protected area does not deliver any economic benefits to local communities\n1: Potential economic  benefits are recognised and plans to realise these are being developed\n2: There is some flow of economic benefits to local communities \n3: There is a major flow of economic benefits to local communities from activities associated with the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["26. Monitoring and evaluation: Are management activities monitored against performance?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L50","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area\n1: There is some ad hoc monitoring and evaluation, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results\n2: There is an agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation system but results do not feed back into management\n3: A good monitoring and evaluation system exists, is well implemented and used in adaptive management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["27. Visitor facilities: Are visitor facilities adequate?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K61","v":"Guest house facilities in good condition - cultural dances -tradtional food cooked and served. ARE these in the PA -a previous question said there were no facilities?"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L61","v":0},null,null,"0: There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need\n1: Visitor facilities and services are inappropriate for current levels of visitation \n2: Visitor facilities and services are adequate for current levels of visitation but could be improved\n3: Visitor facilities and services are excellent for current levels of visitation"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["28. Commercial tourism operators: Do commercial tour operators contribute to protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K59","v":"A small payment is given to the carrires who carry the clothe and, some valuable things given by the tourists - 4 tracks in total- 3 tracks not formally recogized but only 1 track fomally recognised which is Mt Wilhem"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L59","v":"Formalise the 3 current tracks"},null,null,"0: There is little or no contact between managers and tourism operators using the protected area\n1: There is contact between managers and tourism operators but this is largely confined to administrative or regulatory matters\n2: There is limited co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences and maintain protected area values\n3: There is good co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, and maintain protected area values"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["29. Fees: If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L60","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: Although fees are theoretically applied, they are not collected\n1: Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its environs\n2: Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its environs\n3: Fees are collected and make a substantial contribution to the protected area and its environs "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["30. What is the overall condition of the biodiversity of the protected area in terms of the indicator(s) indicated in Data Sheet 2 above?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K84","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L84","v":"What is needed?"},null,null,"0: Severely degraded\n1: Partially degraded\n2: Mostly intact\n3: Completely intact"]
["Comments and Next Steps","Please complete Data Sheet 5 for Question 30 that follows below."]
["Total METT Score (automatically calculated)",{"$f":"SUM(B74:B151)","v":16},null,null,{"$f":"SUM(E74:E151)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(F74:F151)","v":0},"Provide comments here (optional)"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 5: Data sources and methods used to assess the present overall condition of biodiversity in the protected area (METT Question 30, above)."]
["Summarize the data sources used to track the indicator(s) given in Data Sheet 2, and outline the method for assessing the indicator results. The indicator(s) will automatically appear in this table once entered in Data Sheet 2.  \n\nThis table (Data Sheet 5) should be updated, as appropriate, during each application of the METT. An example is provided. "]
["Indicator","Summarize the data sources used to track this indicator",null,null,null,"Outline the method used for assessing the indicator results and what these show about the condition of biodiversity "]
["Example: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year","Records of fire events during the period of monitoring - showing the extent of the area burnt, as recorded by park rangers using hand-held GPS devices to plot boundaries of area and calculate total number of hectares",null,null,null," - Observation of overall trend – more, less or same amount of fire disturbance \n - Reference to scientific literature on ecosystem types to understand optimum fire intervals\n - Examination of fire record to determine historical trends in fires in the PA\n - Analysis of pattern to determine fire frequency in particular parts of PA in and beyond monitoring period"]
[{"$f":"A39","v":"Indicator 1"}]
[{"$f":"A40","v":"Indicator 2"}]
[{"$f":"A41","v":"Indicator 3"}]
[{"$f":"A42","v":"Indicator 4"}]
[{"$f":"A43","v":"Indicator 5"}]