{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":17,"sheets":["About","Dashboard Graphics","Dashboard","Attributes (T1)","Likes (P1,1)","Values Checklist (T2)","Key Values (T3)","Benefits (T4)","Negatives (T5)","Threats (T6)","Worst threat (T7)","Scorecard (T8)","Responses","ConditTrend (T9)","Recomm (T10)","Str & Challenges (T11)","GEF METT"],"not_rendered":{"charts":10,"images":10,"macros":1,"external_links":1,"defined_names":0,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"row_number_cap","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"About","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[16,1,16,2],[16,3,16,4],[17,1,17,2],[17,3,17,4],[18,1,18,2],[18,3,18,4]]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C3","v":"Name of PA (enter here)"}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Country",null,"Papua New Guinea"]
[null,"Protected Area",null,"Madang Lagoon Zone1"]
[null,"Year",null,2021]

{"sheet":"Dashboard Graphics","index":1,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":26,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B113","v":"METT Category"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C113","v":"% Weighted Score"}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B114","v":"Planning"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C114","v":52.020202020202021}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B115","v":"Input"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C115","v":22.499999999999996}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B116","v":"Process"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C116","v":35.491241431835491}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B117","v":"Output"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C117","v":56.25}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B118","v":"Outcome"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C118","v":16.666666666666664}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B119","v":"Governance"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C119","v":43.661971830985912}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B120","v":"TOTAL"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C120","v":37.210051546391746}]

{"sheet":"Dashboard","index":2,"n_rows":134,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":134,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Category","Issue","Possible Score","Score","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted Score",null,null,"Categories for reporting"]
["Planning","1. Legal status",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J3","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","2. PA objectives ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J4","v":1},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","3. PA regulations or customary laws/rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F5","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J5","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G6","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F6","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I6","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J6","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G7","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F7","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I7","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J7","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G8","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F8","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I8","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J8","v":0.75},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J9","v":3},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4a. Land & water planning for habitat conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G10","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I10","v":1.2000000000000002},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J10","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4b. Land & water planning for connectivity",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G11","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I11","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J11","v":0.3},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G12","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I12","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J12","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","5. PA design",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J13","v":3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6a. On ground boundary marking of PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G14","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I14","v":0.89999999999999991},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J14","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6b. Map of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G15","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F15","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I15","v":0.4},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J15","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G16","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F16","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I16","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J16","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the PA ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G17","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F17","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I17","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J17","v":1.5},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G18","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F18","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I18","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J18","v":1},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G19","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F19","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I19","v":1.2000000000000002},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J19","v":0.4},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G20","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F20","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I20","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J20","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G21","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F21","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I21","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J21","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","7. Management planning",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J22","v":2},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J23","v":1},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J24","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G25","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F25","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I25","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J25","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7d. Structures & processes of Management Committee & related PA decision making are clearly documented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G26","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F26","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I26","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J26","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G27","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F27","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I27","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J27","v":0.25},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G28","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F28","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I28","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J28","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J29","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J30","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J31","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F32","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J32","v":1},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J33","v":2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","12. Current budget",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J34","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J35","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G36","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I36","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J36","v":1},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J37","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J38","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","16. Law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J39","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G40","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F40","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I40","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J40","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G41","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F41","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I41","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J41","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G42","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F42","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I42","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J42","v":0.25},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G43","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F43","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I43","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J43","v":0.25},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G44","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F44","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I44","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J44","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G45","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F45","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I45","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J45","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J46","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G47","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F47","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I47","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J47","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F48","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J48","v":2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Process","19. Research ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F49","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J49","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","20. Monitoring & evaluation (of management activities)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J50","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","21. Resource management ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J51","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","22. Climate change ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F52","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J52","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G53","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F53","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I53","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J53","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G54","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F54","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I54","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J54","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I55","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J55","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G56","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F56","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I56","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J56","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","25. Education & awareness ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J57","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","26. Government & commercial neighbour cooperation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J58","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J59","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","28. Fees",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J60","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J61","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J62","v":2},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","31. Local communities & others with access or user ‘rights’",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J63","v":2},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G64","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F64","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I64","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J64","v":0.75},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G65","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F65","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I65","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J65","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G66","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F66","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I66","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J66","v":0.5},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G67","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F67","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I67","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J67","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G68","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F68","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I68","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J68","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in full range of PA decisions ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G69","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F69","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I69","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J69","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G70","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I70","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J70","v":0.5},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Provincial govt",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G71","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F71","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I71","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J71","v":0.5},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & LLG",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G72","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F72","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I72","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J72","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & District reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G73","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F73","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I73","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J73","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Ward reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I74","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J74","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G75","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F75","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I75","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J75","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J76","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31i. Level of support",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J77","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J78","v":2},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G79","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F79","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I79","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J79","v":1},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G80","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F80","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I80","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J80","v":0.5},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G81","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F81","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I81","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J81","v":0.25},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Output","33. Threats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F82","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J82","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F83","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J83","v":2},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J84","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J85","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J86","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J87","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F88","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J88","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F89","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J89","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J90","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J91","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F92","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J92","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F93","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J93","v":0},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G94","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F94","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I94","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J94","v":0.2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G95","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F95","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I95","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J95","v":0.2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G96","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F96","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I96","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J96","v":0.2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G97","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F97","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I97","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J97","v":0.2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G98","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F98","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I98","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J98","v":0.60000000000000009},null,null,"Human resources"]
["TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(C2:C97)","v":224},{"$f":"SUM(D2:D97)","v":92},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E97)","v":155.19999999999996},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F97)","v":57.750000000000014}]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","Score","Possible Score","% Non-weighted score","Weighted Score","Possible Weighted Score","%",null,"Legend"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"SUM(D2:D3,D8:D12,D21:D23,D28)","v":11},{"$f":"SUM(C2:C3,C8:C12,C21:C23,C28)","v":23},{"$f":"C103/D103*100","v":47.826086956521742},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F3,F8:F12,F21:F23,F28)","v":10.3},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E3,E8:E12,E21:E23,E28)","v":19.8},{"$f":"F103/G103*100","v":52.020202020202021},null,null,"Very good progress","76-100%"]
[null,"Input",{"$f":"SUM(D29:D34,D36,D93:D97)","v":11},{"$f":"SUM(C29:C34,C36,C93:C97)","v":36},30.555555555555557,{"$f":"SUM(F29:F34,F36,F93:F97)","v":5.4},{"$f":"SUM(E29:E34,E36,E93:E97)","v":24.000000000000007},22.499999999999996,null,null,"Good progress","51-75%"]
[null,"Process",{"$f":"SUM(D4,D13:D20,D24,D35,D37:D38,D45,D47:D59,D61:D62,D84:D86,D88:D90)","v":30},{"$f":"SUM(C4,C13:C20,C24,C35,C37:C38,C45,C47:C59,C61:C62,C84:C86,C88:C90)","v":81},37.037037037037038,{"$f":"SUM(F4,F13:F20,F24,F37:F38,F35,F45,F47:F59,F61:F62,F84:F86,F88:F90)","v":23.3},{"$f":"SUM(E4,E13:E20,E24,E35,E37:E38,E45,E47:E59,E61:E62,E84:E86,E88:E90)","v":65.650000000000006},35.491241431835491,null,null,"Some progress, high concern","26-50%"]
[null,"Output",{"$f":"SUM(D60,D69:D77,D81:D82)","v":13},{"$f":"SUM(C69:C77,C81:C82,C60)","v":20},65,{"$f":"SUM(F81:F82,F69:F77,F60)","v":9},{"$f":"SUM(E60,E69:E77,E81:E82)","v":16},56.25,null,null,"Little or no progress","0-25%"]
[null,"Outcome",{"$f":"SUM(D83,D87,D91:D92)","v":2},{"$f":"SUM(C83,C87,C91:C92)","v":12},16.666666666666664,{"$f":"SUM(F91:F92,F87,F83)","v":2},{"$f":"SUM(E91:E92,E87,E83)","v":12},16.666666666666664]
[null,"Governance",{"$f":"SUM(D5:D7,D25:D27,D39:D44,D46,D63:D68,D78:D80)","v":25},{"$f":"SUM(C5:C7,C25:C27,C39:C44,C46,C63:C68,C78:C80)","v":52},48.07692307692308,{"$f":"SUM(F5:F7,F25:F27,F39:F44,F46,F63:F68,F78:F80)","v":7.75},{"$f":"SUM(E78:E80,E63:E68,E46,E39:E44,E25:E27,E5:E7)","v":17.75},43.661971830985912]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C103:C108)","v":92},{"$f":"SUM(D103:D108)","v":224},41.071428571428569,{"$f":"SUM(F103:F108)","v":57.75},{"$f":"SUM(G103:G108)","v":155.20000000000002},37.210051546391746]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"H103","v":52.020202020202021}]
[null,"Input",22.499999999999996]
[null,"Process",35.491241431835491]
[null,"Output",56.25]
[null,"Outcome",16.666666666666664]
[null,"Governance",43.661971830985912]
[null,"TOTAL",37.210051546391746]
[]
[]
[null,"Themes","Weighted Score","Possible W'ed Score","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Design & establishment",{"$f":"SUM(F2,F12:F20)","v":6.8},{"$f":"SUM(E2,E12:E20)","v":12.400000000000002},{"$f":"C124/D124*100","v":54.838709677419338}]
[null,"Planning & objectives",{"$f":"SUM(F3,F8:F11,F21:F28)","v":7.55},{"$f":"SUM(E3,E8:E11,E21:E28)","v":15.3},{"$f":"C125/D125*100","v":49.346405228758165}]
[null,"Legislation, control & enforcement",{"$f":"SUM(F4:F7,F38:F46)","v":5.75},{"$f":"SUM(E4:E7,E38:E46)","v":20},28.749999999999996]
[null,"Resource management",{"$f":"SUM(F29,F48:F55,F81:F82,F85:F86,F89:F90)","v":11.5},{"$f":"SUM(E29,E48:E55,E81:E82,E85:E86,E89:E90)","v":30},38.333333333333336]
[null,"Human resources",{"$f":"SUM(F30:F32,F47,F63:F68,F93:F97)","v":8.4},{"$f":"SUM(E93:E97,E63:E68,E47,E30:E32)","v":18},46.666666666666664]
[null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment",{"$f":"SUM(F33:F37)","v":1},{"$f":"SUM(E33:E37)","v":15},6.666666666666667]
[null,"Relationships, education & awareness",{"$f":"SUM(F56:F57,F61:F62,F69:F76)","v":10},{"$f":"SUM(E56:E57,E61:E62,E69:E76)","v":16},62.5]
[null,"Tourism & recreation",{"$f":"SUM(F58:F60)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E58:E60)","v":9},0]
[null,"Economic benefit",{"$f":"SUM(F77:F80)","v":3.75},{"$f":"SUM(E77:E80)","v":5.5},68.181818181818173]
[null,"Condition of values",{"$f":"SUM(F83:F84,F87:F88,F91:F92)","v":3},{"$f":"SUM(E83:E84,E87:E88,E91:E92)","v":14},21.428571428571427]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C124:C133)","v":57.75},{"$f":"SUM(D124:D133)","v":155.19999999999999},37.210051546391753]

{"sheet":"Attributes (T1)","index":3,"n_rows":77,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":77,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]],"read":"row_number_cap"}
["Protected area attributes (Table 1)"]
[null,"Question","Your answer"]
[null,null,"Name of PA (enter here)"]
[1,"Country","Papua New Guinea"]
[2,"Location of protected area","Madang Lagoon"]
["2a","Province(s)","Madang Province"]
["2b","District/s","Madang"]
["2c","Local level government(s)","North Ambenob"]
["2d","Wards (Name and/or number)",10]
[3,"Name of the protected area","Laugum Should this be Madang Lagoon Zone 1?"]
["3a","CEPA Protected Area site code"]
[4,"World Database of Protected Areas site code"]
[5,"Date when the protected area was formally established (dd/mm/yyyy)","Not formally established. Informal agreements in place???"]
["5a","Gazettal information or designation information (what does the date above refer to?)"]
[6,"What is the size of the protected area (in km2)?","Can you give an estimate of how big this area is?"]
[7,"Protected area designation(s): What level or kind of protected area is it? ","Wildlife Management Area This is correct for Laugum, but not for Zone 1."]
[8,"IUCN Protected area category "]
[9,"IUCN Protected area category (other) "]
[10,"International designations. Is the site listed under an international designation e.g. World Heritage site or Ramsar site, or WWF Global 2000 etc? (Y/N)"]
["10a","World Heritage site (Y/N)"]
["10b","Ramsar site (Y/N)"]
["10c","UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves (Y/N)"]
[11,"Other designations. Is the site listed under any other designation? (Y/N) "]
[12,"Has the site been identified as a site of particular importance for biodiversity? (Y/N)"]
[13,"Who owns the protected area?","Customary Landowners"]
["13a","If the protected area is owned by customary landowners, please indicate all the relevant Clans.","6 clans: Gamarmatu, Matanan, Gewanem, Panufon, Nuwo and Sek"]
["13b","How many households live within the protected area? (e.g. 15)",">600 households"]
["13c","How many people live within the protected area? (e.g. 367)",">10000"]
["13d","What proportion of the population living within the protected area comprises children (under 18 years old)?",0.8]
["13e","Briefly outline what surrounds the protected area","The protected area is suroundede by settlements, coconut planatations and RD Fishing Company and PMIZ (Pacific Marine Industrial Zone), Malaysian Logging Company (which company?)."]
[14,"Who manages the protected area? ","The PA management committee was formed earlier but its not effective to date (Does this mean there is a Mg'mt Committee for the whole zone or just for Laugum - need to be clear here)"]
[15,"Are there any special areas where restrictions or rules are in place that limit the activities that can take place in that area?","Yes (refer to map on 'Likes' worksheet (then you need to insert the map on the next sheet)"]
[16,"Briefly describe the cultural system, family, traditions, pasin tumbuna and the way in which customary landowners care for (lukautim) the land/sea in the protected area (i.e. if the protected area is owned by customary landowners).","Traditional systems of conservation are still practiced at the community level. One part of the reef will be closed for closure monitoring while other reefs are open for usage. The boundary of the reef closure will be demacarted by certain plants as a no go zone. The closure of the reef goes for 3 to 6 months or a year depending on the severity of threats to the marine resources especially the fish species."]
[17,"What rights do ‘other’ people have in relation to the protected area? (i.e. those who are not customary landowners)","User rights are not restricted to outside people and outsiders are allowed to fish in the protected area."]
[18,"What is the process for deciding how land/sea in the protected area is accessed and used?","Open to community use (This question is about how the decisions are made - is there a committee or group that decides this?)"]
[19,"Total number of staff. Does the protected area have staff (paid workers)? (Y/N)","No"]
["19a","Number of Permanent paid workers and their positions (e.g. 5 rangers, 1 manager)","No"]
["19b","Number of Temporary paid workers and their positions (e.g. 4 caretakers, 5 rangers)","No"]
["19c","How many people do work in the protected area on a voluntary basis (not paid)? ","6 clan leaders"]
["19d","What type of work do these voluntary workers/customary landowners undertake?","The clan leaders are continuously monitoring the PA and also represent the PA communities in the industries occuring close to the PA."]
[20,"What is the annual budget (Kina/ USD) for recurrent (operational) funds (excluding staff salary costs)?",0]
["20a","Year for which the budget is reported","NA"]
["20b","Recurrent (operational) funds",0]
["20c","Project or other supplementary or special funds (excluding staff salary costs)",0]
[21,"How many visitors came to the protected area last calendar year? ","200+ "]
["21a","In what year were these visitor numbers reported? (yyyy)",2020]
["21b","Describe the main reasons for the tourist visits","Visit war relics, beaches, and the historical church"]
[22,"Main value 1 ",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Mangroves ecosystem"}]
[null,"Main value 2",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B5","v":"Sago palms"}]
[null,"Main value 3",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B6","v":"Historical sites (war relics and sacred sites)"}]
[null,"Main value 4",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B7","v":"Coral reefs"}]
[null,"Main value 5"]
[23,"What are the benefits that arise from having the protected area?","Please go to Benefits (T4) and write these in."]
[24,"Management objective 1","To protect the area for future generations "]
[null,"Management objective 2                                     ","To protect all the natural habitats, sacred and war relic sites including freshwater and lakes"]
[null,"Management objective 3","To use user friendly fishing gear and sustainable fishing methods"]
[25,"Are there any negative impacts or burdens on the wellbeing of customary landowners and others with user/access rights to the protected area that result from the protected area? If so, list them briefly here","The user rights/access of traditional landowners are limited or restricted in the PA. Refer to Table 5 Sorry, but these MUST be written in here - this is the attributes page where all general information about the PA must be displayed."]
[26,"Total number of people involved in completing or answering the questions in this assessment",5]
["26a","Protected area manager (this includes the management committee members)","None"]
["26b","Protected area staff (paid workers)","None"]
["26c","Other Protected Area authority staff","None"]
["26d","Volunteer","Local Participants This needs to be written with a number AND the names of the people etc - refer to sign in sheet to get this information i.e. 3. John Smith, customary landowner, phone?? Contact details etc. This information is important for contacting the people who participated."]
["26e","NGO","None"]
["26f","Customary landowners, including the local community members and clan leaders","Local Participants As above"]
["26g","Donors and/or sponsors","None"]
["26h","External consultants","None"]
["26i","Others "]
[27,"Please note if the assessment was conducted in association with a particular project, on behalf of an organisation or donor.","UNDP-GEF-CEPA"]
["28a","The Facilitator Name and position","Rita Goiye, Marine Officer"]
["28b","Facilitator - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
["28c","Facilitator - Address, Email, Phone","P.O Box 6601, Boroko, NCD, rgoiye@gmail.com"]
[29,"Recorder- Name and position","Rita Goiye, Marine Officer"]
[null,"Recorder - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
[null,"Recorder - Address, Email, Phone","P.O Box 6601, Boroko, NCD, rgoiye@gmail.com"]
[30,"Date the assessment carried out (e.g. 29/01/2019)","7-8 October 2021"]
[null,null,"Please note that the responses for Values Q22 should NOT be written in - they are automatically inserted when the Key Values table is completed. I have reinserted the cross links for this question."]
[null,null,"Please review text in red and change to black text if you agree."]

{"sheet":"Likes (P1,1)","index":4,"n_rows":5,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":5,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1]]}
["Protected area description - \"What I like about the protected area\""]
["PA Name","Description (of what people like about the PA)"]
[null,"Insert text - this should include the words spoken by the PA representative(s) when they describe what they like about their PA"]
["Industrial Zone- Vidar, Midim","The industrial zone is comprised of six clans - Vidar, St. Fedelis, Midiba, Sek, Alexishafen and Kananam. We are living within the industrial zone where our marine resources badly are affacted by the industrial waste. The coral reefs are badly affacted by the continuous oil spills from the bigger fishing companies. Most reefs area degraded, the fish population is decreasing at an alarming rate due to water ballast from bigger fishing ships, the engine noise of the ships chased away the marine resources and habitat destroyed. Our marine resources are decreasing in numbers. Population increase is another major contribution to the decreasing of our marine resources due to no strict rules and guidelines in place. We have war relices (tanker, planes, machines guns, ships, wharves, airstrip used during WW2) in few sites, We have a catholic historical church built in the 1800s by the German missionies. Before the establishemnt of the RD Cannery Comapnies, the surrounding marine environment was pristines and intact. After the establishment of the RD Cannries our marine environment has been damaged, impacted by the waste from the comapnies. We are located in the impacted site of the Madang Lagoon.  We also have a passage called Narz where it is like our marine highway for all marine resources. Dolphins, sharks, dugong and beautiful coral reefs and fishes are found in this passage. "]
[null,"The text above is good. Well done. With the image (right) - please remember to take the photo so that the image is square - either stick butcher's paper on the wall at eye level or put on the floor and take the image. I have cropped the image, but you can see that it is not squate - so just a comment for next time. I have also included the map (which is referred to in Attributes worksheet."]

{"sheet":"Values Checklist (T2)","index":5,"n_rows":54,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":54,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,6]]}
["Checklist of protected area values and benefits (Table 2)"]
["Q. No.","(Summary Question)","Question: Does the protected area:","Answer (click on arrow)","Score","Total score possible","Comment (to help explain the score)"]
[1,"Biodiversity","Provide for biodiversity (i.e. have many different kinds of plants, animals and ecosystems)?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D3,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"There is still a lot of marine and freshwater resources, including mangroves within our protected area"]
[2,"Special plants & animals","Have species of plants and animals listed as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered","Some",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":1},2,"Most of the marine species of animals are no longer caught like they used to before. We have to travel further out to fish or you will never catch anything."]
[3,"Locally endemic plants or animal spp","Have species of plants or animals found only in the protected area or nearby locations?","None",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":0},2,"None"]
[4,"Important ecosystems","Contain important ecosystems (e.g. wetlands, grasslands, coral reefs etc)? ","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Mangroves, seagrass/weed, coral reefs, sago palms."]
[5,"Protect clean, fresh water","Protect clean, fresh water?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Major damage is caused to our fresh water due to the PMIZ, water ballast, slip ways and logging, fishing vessels and the travelling public."]
[6,"Religious or spiritual significance","Have religious or spiritual significance (e.g. tambu places, sacred sites)?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"We have a lot of sacred sites in our sites."]
[7,"Scientific value","Have scientific value?","Some",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":1},2,"Our coral reefs and marine resources are scientific values and has interest for the world."]
[8,"Source of employment for local communities","Provide a source of employment for local communities?","None",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":0},2]
[9,"Resources for local subsistence","Provide resources for local subsistence (e.g. food, building materials, medicines etc)?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Our lives depend on our surrounding resources the protected could provide anything in particular that could be included e.g. fish, shellfish, mangroves???"]
[10,"Resources for sale & benefits aid community d'ment & well-being","Provide resources for sale, with the benefits used to enable community development and enhance well-being?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Our livelihood depend entirely on the marine reources within the protected area The question is asking about which resources are sold - can a list of the items be included here. There is also a hint in the question about what the benefits are from this."]
[11,"Foster & attract community d'ment projects to enhance community well-being","Foster and attract community development projects to enhance community well-being?","None",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":0},2,"The projects only benefits the company and not the communities"]
[12,"Place where culture, language & traditions are practiced","Provide a place where culture, language and traditional practices can be practiced?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"The traditonal systems of passing the knowledge and skills to younger generation is still maintained these days."]
[13,"People who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations","Have people who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Yes it is still maintain today. This is our identity and we must pass it to future generation"]
[14,"Plant species of high cultural or economic importance","Have plant species of high cultural or economic importance?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Plants such as sago palms, mangroves,bamboos, betelnuts"]
[15,"Animal species of high cultural or economic importance","Have animal species of high cultural or economic importance?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"Pig, seashells, and fish."]
[16,"Historical sites","Have historical sites?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"We have a lot of historical sites such as the war relics, catholic church built in the 1800s."]
[17,"Nice scenery","Have nice scenery (naispela hap long lukim)?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2,"We have a lot of nice scenery sites that attracts outsiders."]
[18,"Tourism activities now","Have any tourism activities now?","Some",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":1},2,"Yes we do have a few tourism activities within our protected area because of the coral reefs and colourful sites we have."]
[19,"Potential for tourism activities in the future","Have the potential for tourism activities in the future?","A lot",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":2},2]
[20,"Role in providing educational opportunities","Have a role in providing educational opportunities?","Some",{"$f":"(VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE))","v":1},2,"In the initial stage of establishing the WMA we had the opportunity to attend trainings conducted by WWF, unlike today when there are no educational opportunities "]
[null,"TOTAL","TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(E3:E22)","v":30},{"$f":"SUM(F3:F22)","v":40}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Insert this legend onto your graph","Legend"]
[null,null,null,0,"None"]
[null,null,null,1,"Some"]
[null,null,null,2,"A lot"]

{"sheet":"Key Values (T3)","index":6,"n_rows":7,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":7,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area values (Table 3)"]
["No.","Key values ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. only known breeding area for the PNG Heron)","(e.g. large freshwater wetland areas immediately above high tide provide nesting sites and food for rearing chicks. Island location means no interference from feral animals or from vehicles)."]
[1,"Mangroves ecosystem","Mangroves provide us with stems for housing posts, fencing, firewood, breeding ground for all marine animals, act as seawalls against strongs waves and strong winds","This information could go in the values checklist."]
[2,"Sago palms","Sago palms provide us with food and shelter. The sago leaves are used for roof patching and weaving grass skirts, the pagal is used for house walling.","As above"]
[3,"Historical sites (war relics and sacred sites)","We have a few historical sites including: catholic church built in the 1800s by German missionaries, the WW2 relics of tanker and ships, birth and sacred sites that we have high respect for those sites"]
[4,"Coral reefs","We have one of the most colourful and magnificant coral reefs in our protected area. These coral reefs house most of the coral reef fishes, seashells and most of the marine animals"]

{"sheet":"Benefits (T4)","index":7,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area benefits (Table 4)"]
["No.","Benefit/Positive","Brief description "]
[]
[1,"The RD Cannery used to disposed of their waste into the Lagoon, but they have slightly minimisde their waste disposal.","The RD Cannery was developed before Madang Lagoon was declared as a protected area. The industry's waste has been deposited into the Lagoon and this caused skin infections to our kids, diarrhoea and other diseases as well. The establishment of the protected area has brought about some postive feedback from our communities. "]
[2,"Dead fish is not observed anymore","The protected area has brought some positive changes to our communities. The fish kills we used to observe in the past are no longer observed."]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[]
[]
[null,null,"Note: Please enter these benefits into Attributes (Table 1) Q23"]
[null,null,"(Add other rows for additional benefits)"]
[null,"The oil spills in our lagoon is no longer observed in bigger quantity like it used to be before. ","The oil spills in our lagoon are no longer observed in the big quantities like it used to be before. The Company formed a monitoring team to monitor the oil spills in the surrounding environment"]
[null,"The mesh size nets is stricted to certain mesh sizes","Certain net sizes are resticted to be used within the protected area"]

{"sheet":"Negatives (T5)","index":8,"n_rows":7,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":7,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area negative impacts (Table 5)"]
["No.","Negative impact ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. restrictions on fishing)","(explain why this is a negative)"]
[1,"The user rights fishing grounds have been restricted to certain areas.","Certain areas within the protected area is stricted to the user rights (So what is the perceived problem - lack of fish??"]
[2,"Restriction of unsustainable fishing gears/methods","Certain net mesh sizes have been used, hook and line and spear gun only used. Derris roots and dynamite no longer used (I am not clear on why this is a negative - I understand the positive benefits this can bring, but are there some in the community that don't like this - who are they?)"]
[3,"Poachers have increased within the protected area","Conflict arise within communities due to restrictions placed on certain areas."]
[4,"Conflict of interest has arisen between clans who are the rightful owners of the no go zone activities within the protected area.","So this needs to be explained.,"]

{"sheet":"Threats (T6)","index":9,"n_rows":72,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":72,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[69,0,71,0],[0,0,0,9],[32,0,38,0],[39,0,42,0],[43,0,50,0],[51,0,54,0],[55,0,63,0],[64,0,68,0],[3,0,6,0],[7,0,12,0],[13,0,15,0],[16,0,19,0],[20,0,25,0],[26,0,31,0]]}
["Detailed assessment of threats (Table 6)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Meaning of ratings"]
["Threat category\n","Threat ","Description ","Threat extent ","Threat extent score","Threat severity ","Threat severity score","Management response now","Future management response ","Notes includings values affected"]
[null,"Sub-categories of threat","If the threat is present, insert details of the threat in the PA","Select from pull down menu","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","Select from pull down menu (leave blank if not applicable)","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","List the management responses that are occurring NOW","List what management needs to do to address the threat","Write additional information here",null,"Extent rating","Meaning: the threat is…."]
["1: Housing and commercial development within a protected area\nThreats from human settlements or other non-agricultural land uses","1.1 Housing and settlement ","In this column there needs to be a description of what the threat is. Column H states what is being managed now and column I is future management. So please describe what the problem is in relation to housing.","High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F4,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management actions: 1. The elders in the church have addressed the issue of resettlement within the PA. Those resettlers who settle with more extented families must be evicted. Management Action: 2. Giving eviction orders to outside settlers","There are 2 types of land usage in the PA communiy. The customary and church lands. The church land has bigger portion of land with customary land title than the customary land itself. The  customary land has been occupied by the intermariages which are reserve land within the church land. Managment Actions: Create dialogue with Church Leaders to give back the reserve land to the customary landowners and evict all the foreigners. this will minimise the impact housing settlement have within the PA","Customary Landowner Knowledge",null,"Very high (4)","widespread and affects the value throughout the PA "]
[null,"1.2 Commercial and industrial areas","As above - please describe briefly what the threat is. Please do this for all the threats that have a rating.","Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F5,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management responses: The clan directors represents the communities by having continuous dialogue with the companies to reduce the impact on the PA. The clan directors are sometimes biased with their decision making because there are paid by the company. its hard to address the impact affecting the PA","Management responses. The only options in the future is to change all the clan directors with new leaders those that can respresent the locals in PA.","Customary Landowner Knowledge",null,"High (3)","widespread and affects the value at many locations "]
[null,"1.3 Tourism and recreation infrastructure (e.g. structures)",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F6,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"Management actions: Continous education and awareness on unwanted pregancies as well as family planning. Engagement of local youths to be part of the awareness programs in all the community","Management responses. Invite all the HEALTH ADVOCATES to run the health programs of family planning, unwanted pregnancies, dieseas. Marie Stopes and mary safe haus. Continuous edcationa and awareness","Customary Landowner Knowledge",null,"Medium (2)","localised and affects the value at some locations"]
[null,"1.4 Population increase in the protected area community",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F7,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},null,null,null,null,"Low (1)","localised and found in only limited locations and the impact on our values is limited"]
["2: Agriculture and aquaculture within a protected area\nThreats to the proteted area from all kinds of farming and grazing including plantations, forestry and fishing","2.1 Customary landowner and community gardens and small crops",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F8,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"None (0)","threat is not present"]
[null,"2.2 Drug cultivation",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F9,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Severity rating","Meaning: the threat is …."]
[null,"2.3 Wood and pulp plantations \n",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F10,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Very high (4)","likely to destroy some protected area value(s) (e.g. it might destroy a type of animal or plant, or your traditional gardens)"]
[null,"2.4 Livestock farming and grazing ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F11,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"High (3)","likely to seriously degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs "]
[null,"2.5 Marine and freshwater aquaculture ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F12,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Medium (2)","likely to moderately degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs – they are damaging values but not so badly "]
[null,"2.6 Commercial plantations",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F13,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Low (1)","only slightly impacting on protected areas values "]
["3. Energy production and mining within a protected area\nThreats from production of non-biological resources ","3.1 Oil and gas drilling and pipeline construction",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F14,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"3.2 Mining and quarrying",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F15,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"3.3 Energy generation",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F16,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["4. Transportation and service corridors\nThreats from long narrow transport corridors and the vehicles (and people) that use some of them","4.1 Roads, railroads and paths/tracks ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F17,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"4.2 Utility and service lines",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F18,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"4.3 Shipping lanes and canals",null,"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F19,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions: create dialogue with the responsible shippings companies and come up with strict rules about waste management, water ballast, oil spills..address all these issues","Management actions: create dialogue with the responsible shippings companies and come up with strict rules about waste management, water ballast, oil spills..address all these issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"4.4 Flight paths",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F20,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["5. Biological resource use and harm within a protected area\nThreats from the use of \"wild\" biological resources including both deliberate and unintentional harvesting effects (Note this includes hunting and killing of animals). ","5.1 Hunting, killing and collecting terrestrial (native) animals (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F21,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"5.2 Gathering terrestrial (native) plants or plant products (non-timber) (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F22,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"5.3a Logging and wood harvesting for local/customary use",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F23,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"  5.3b Logging and wood harvesting – commercial logging",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F24,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"  5.4a Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for local/customary use",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F25,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"5.4b Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for commercial use",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F26,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["6. Human intrusions and disturbance within a protected area\nThreats from human activities that alter, destroy or disturb habitats and species associated with non-consumptive uses of biological resources","6.1 Recreational and tourism activities",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D27,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F27,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F28,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.3 Research, education and other wor-related activities in the protected area",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D29,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F29,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.4 Activities of the protected area managers (e.g. construction or vehicle use)",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D30,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F30,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.5 Deliberate destructive activities or threats to protected area staff and visitors ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D31,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F31,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.6 Impacts from cultural and religious tourism",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D32,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F32,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["7. Changes to natural systems \nThreats from other actions that convert or degrade habitat or change the way the ecosystem functions.","7.1 Habitat clearing ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D33,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F33,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.2 Fire and fire suppression",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D34,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F34,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.3 Dams, water flow modification and water management/use ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D35,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F35,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.4 Increased fragmentation within the protected area ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D36,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F36,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.5 The protected area is separated from other natural habitat",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D37,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F37,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.6 Other ‘edge effects’ (impacts) happening on the boundary of the protected area ",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D38,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F38,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management actions: create dialogue with the responsible shippings companies and come up with strict rules about waste management, water ballast, oil spills..address all these issues","Management actions: create dialogue with the responsible shippings companies and come up with strict rules about waste management, water ballast, oil spills..address all these issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"7.7 Loss of keystone species",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D39,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F39,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["8. Invasive and other problematic species and genes. Threats from terrestrial and aquatic non-native and native plants, animals, pathogens/microbes or genetic materials that have, or are predicted to have, harmful effects on biodiversity following introduction, spread and/or increase","8.1  Introduced (pest) plants",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D40,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F40,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: uproot all the plants with the pest in them","Management actions: uproot all the plants with the pest in them. Most shipping vessels do introduced most of the pest from other countries when transpassing our passage.  Our cland directors need to bring our conceren to revelant authorities","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"8.2 Introduced (pest) animals ",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D41,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F41,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Mangement actions: Kill all the pig with  swine flu","Mangement actions: Kill all the pig with  swine flu. Clan directors need to bring our issues to concern authority to address the issues.","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"8.3 Diseases such as fungus or viruses that make native plants or animals sick ",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D42,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F42,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management actions: Cut down all the plants that have the fungus and burnt them completely","Managemnt Actions: Work with relevant agencies, NGOs, KIK to address the issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"8.4 Introduced genetic material",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D43,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F43,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["9. Pollution entering or generated  \nThreats from pollution and/or excess materials or energy from specific sites or more general sources ","9.1 Household sewage and urban/village waste water \n",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D44,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F44,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.2 Sewage and waste water from protected area facilities",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F45,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.3 Industrial, mining and military effluents and discharges",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D46,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F46,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: Clan directors to take our issues to the concern agencies, companies to address the issues","Management actions: Clan directors to take our issues to the concern agencies, companies to address the issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"9.4 Agricultural and forestry effluents",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D47,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F47,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.5 Garbage and solid waste ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D48,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F48,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.6 Air-borne pollutants",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D49,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F49,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management actions: Clan directors to take our issues to the concern agencies, companies to address the issues","Management actions: Clan directors to take our issues to the concern agencies, companies to address the issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"9.7 Excess energy",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D50,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F50,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.8 Sound pollution (especially from roads)",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D51,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F51,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Management Actions: Noise from passing fishing vessels when its fishing seasons starts. The noise pollution is so high that has impact on the human population within the PA.","Management actions: Clan directors to take our issues to the concern agencies, companies to address the issues","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
["10. Geological events \nGeological events may be part of natural disturbance regimes in many ecosystems. However, they can be a threat if a species or habitat is damaged and has lost its resilience and is vulnerable to disturbance. Management capacity to respond to some of these changes may be limited.","10.1 Volcanoes (ash and lava)\n",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D52,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F52,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"10.2 Earthquakes/Tsunamis ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D53,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F53,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"10.3 Avalanches/ Landslides ",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D54,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F54,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"10.4 Erosion and deposition",null,"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F55,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Management actions: Depend on the occurrence of it","Management actions: Depend on the occurrence of it","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
["11. Climate change and severe weather  \nThreats from long-term climatic changes which may be linked to global warming and other severe climatic/ weather events outside of the natural range of variation","11.1 Habitat shifting and alteration ",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D56,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F56,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: Building sea walls, planting mangroves","Management actions:  Building sea walls, planting mangroves","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.2 Droughts ",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D57,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F57,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Mangement actions: the first ever climate change related drought occurred in 2014. Most of the grassland were on fires including sago palms wetlands. Create dialogue with revelant authrities to assist with food and water rations. It went for the whole year.","Mangement actions: Prepare for such events by digging bore waters, all hwater tanksouseholds must have excess to ","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.3 Temperature extremes ",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D58,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F58,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: find water and water all the gardens food.","Management actions: find water and water all the gardens food. Each family has to take up initiatives to find water. Food gardens all dried up.","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.4 Storms and flooding",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D59,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F59,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: shift to other locations and build houses and plant mangroves along the shoreline","Management actions: shift to other locations and build houses and plant mangroves along the shoreline","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.5 Ocean acidification",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D60,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F60,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.6 Sea level rise",null,"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D61,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F61,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Management actions: plant more mangroves in all the islands and mainlands","Management actions: Create dialogue with relevant agencies and NGOs to conduct capacity building and Plant mangroves.","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.7 Coral bleaching",null,"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D62,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F62,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions:","Management actions:","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"11.8 Saltwater coming into the protected area",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D63,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F63,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.9 Other climate changes",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D64,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F64,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["12. Cultural and social threats ","12.1 Loss of cultural links, traditional knowledge, language, dress, sing sings, respect and/or management practices",null,"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F65,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions: The elders in the villages are trying their best to impart the knowledge and skills to the younger generations","Management actions: The elders in the villages are trying their best to impart the knowledge and skills to the younger generations","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"12.2 Natural deterioration of important cultural site values ",null,"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D66,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F66,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"All the customary important cultural sites values are deteorating since introduction of early missionaries. No more beliefs in the strongholds. No more housemen of sacred sites for initiation","No plans to revive our culturals sites values","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"12.3 Destruction of cultural heritage buildings, gardens, sites etc ",null,"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F67,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Once the introduction of early missionaries all our cultural heritage buildings, sites are destroyed ","No plans to revive our culturals heritage values","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"12.4 Loss of land tenure",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D68,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F68,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"Conflict of lands is a major concern for the locals within th PA","Create dialogue with the Church Reps to give back our reserve land for us to settle. Population increase causing land shortage","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"12.5 Other cultural/social threats",null,"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F69,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["13. Governance problems","13.1 Conflicting policies across sectors",null,"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F70,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions: The policies in the National/ Provincial and District levels has to be made clear to the locals.","Management actions: The policies in the National/ Provincial and District levels has to be made clear to the locals.","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"13.2 Confusion about government roles and responsibilities",null,"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F71,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions: The roles and responsibilities of all relevant government and NGOs has to be made clear to us so we know who to contact for assistance","Management actions: The roles and responsibilities of all relevant government and NGOs has to be made clear to us so we know who to contact for assistance","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]
[null,"13.3 Lack of coordination across all levels of government",null,"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F72,Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Management actions: Effective engagement with all revelant government agencies and Prov, Districe, and LLGs to work with locals","Management actions: Effective engagement with all revelant government agencies and Prov, Districe, and LLGs to work with locals","Customary Landowner Knowledge"]

{"sheet":"Worst threat (T7)","index":10,"n_rows":6,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":6,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,3,2,3],[0,0,0,1]]}
["Worst threats (Table 7)"]
["Rank order","Threat","Threat number ","Additional comments"]
[null,"(most significant first)","(copy from Table 6 e.g. 11.1)"]
[1,"Population increase in the protected area community",1.4,"Too many unwanted pregnancies and population ncrease. Conflicts arise within the PA due to depleting resources and shortage of land"]
[2,"Loss of cultural links, traditional knowledge language, dress, singsings,respect and/or management practices",12.1,"The traditional knowledge and skills is not passed to younger generation by elders. This young generation are interested in western influentials. "]
[3,"Lack of coordination across all levels of government",13.3,"No proper coordination between all relevant authorities in the government sectors"]

{"sheet":"Scorecard (T8)","index":11,"n_rows":99,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":99,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,1,0,13]]}
[null,"METT Scorecard (Table 8)"]
["Category","Issue","Question","Select response (from pull down menu)","Response","Score","Possible score ","Weighting","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted score","Evidence & Justification (Reasons for choosing the response)","Actions to improve management","Information Source (Select from pull down menu)","Comments on information source (add additional sources here)"]
["Planning","1. Legal status","Does the protected area have legal status or is it established under “other effective means”? (e.g. in the case of private reserves is it covered by a covenant or similar)? ","A. The protected area is not gazetted/approved by national or provincial government or has not been established through ‘other effective means’",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D3,Responses!B2:D7,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E3,Responses!C2:E7,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,{"$f":"G3*H3","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F3=\"not relevant\",\" \",F3*H3)","v":0},"There is no effective means to approve this to become legal.","The Government should approve  and legalise it for effective management ","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","2. Protected area objectives ","Is protected area management based on agreed objectives?","B. The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!B8:D13,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E4,Responses!C8:E13,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,{"$f":"G4*H4","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",\" \",F4*H4)","v":1},"Say something about the agreed objectives - what are they, when were they agreed and by whom - e.g. in a plan or by traditional practices etc. There is no funded aid from the government to assist achieve our agreed objectives","We need funding to manage our protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","3. Protected area regulations or customary laws/rules","Are laws, rules or agreements in place to manage land or marine use and activities in the protected area in accordance with the management objectives? (includes hunting, logging, mining, fishing)","B. Some regulations or customary laws for managing land/sea use and activities in the protected area exist but there are many weaknesses",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!B14:D19,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E5,Responses!C14:E19,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"There are many weaknesses to enforce some strict measures in the protected area due to lack of funds ","We need funds to assist us enforec some strict measures within the protected areas","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules","Are the rules/laws/regulations relating to the protected area clearly defined and documented?","A. Protected area-related rules/laws/regulations are not clearly defined and documented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!B20:D25,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E6,Responses!C20:E25,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"The protected area related rules and laws are not clearly defined therefore the population living within the protected are not aware of the rules and laws of the protected area","We need funding to do continuous education and awareness of the rules and laws of the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ","Are the rights of people to use the protected area and its resources clearly defined and documented?","C. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!B26:D31,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E7,Responses!C26:E31,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,0.5,"The user/access rights to resources are clearly defined to the community within the protected area but due to lack of monitoring and survailence its not being monitored. The Q is really about how they are defined and documented - so are they written down, verbally agreed ?","Funding is our major obstacle to provide survailence and monitoring within the protected area If the rules are not written down in a plan or something, is there a need to clearly define/document these - the question is about definition and documentation so that the rules/rights of people can be referred to.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights","What percentage of adults in the protected area and local community are aware of their user/access rights (e.g. to hunt, collect, fish etc)","D.   Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!B32:D37,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E8,Responses!C32:E37,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.25,0.75,0.75,"Marjority of the community are aware of their user rights to harvest in the protected area. It’s the intermarriages that bring in their relatives that cause problems to the protected ara","We lack funding to do awareness to the community about the user access rights to the resources","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the protected area","Does planning for land and coastal/marine uses outside the protected area recognise the protected area and contribute to achieving the management objectives?","D. Planning for land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area fully takes into account the long-term needs of the protected area and seeks to support the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!B38:D43,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E9,Responses!C38:E43,2,FALSE)","v":3},1,1,1,3,"Yes the RD Cannery, Fishing Company as well as the logging company have taken into consideration the land/marine uses that they are using outside the protected area What about broader land use planning that considers environmental/PA issues? This could also include tourism planning etc. Score seems a bit high for me??","The land/marine uses outside of the protected area must be made effective in the management plan to enforce some strict measures.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation","Planning and management in the wider catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provisions for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. air/water/noise pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F10=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},0.4,1.2000000000000002,{"$f":"IF(F10=\"NA\",\" \",F10*H10)","v":0},"At the moment we do not have such planning as yet. ","Maybe in the future we should consider that into the management plan","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4b. Land and water planning for connectivity","Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,{"$f":"IF(F11=\"NA\",\" \",F11*H11)","v":0.3},"Yes we do have corridors linking the protected area that provides for wildlife passing to key habitats outside the protected area and also we have seen spill over of the marine resources outside the protected area.","The management of the corridors linking protected must be effectively monitored and protected from outside disturbances","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation","Planning addresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,{"$f":"IF(F12=\"NA\",\" \",F12*H12)","v":0},"We do not have any planning to address ecosystem species needs at the moment.","We may factor that in our future planing","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","5. Protected area design","Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecosystems and water catchments?","D.   Protected area size and the boundaries (i.e. the design) are very good and we can achieve our objectives",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,3,FALSE)","v":3},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F13=\"NA\",\" \",F13*H13)","v":3},"The protected area has the right size to protect the species, habitats, ecosystems and water catchment. Our only fear are  the industries developed next to our protected. ","Our protected area is slowing loosing away the pristine environment we once have due to industrial activities developed next to our protected area. We want tough management in place to protect our area from harmful damage from the surrounding industries. So in relation to Q4 this response seems to contradict the score that is given - here it is saying that the planning outside is contributing to losing the pristing environment - maybe need to justify score in 4 on the basis of the comments here.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6a. On ground boundary marking of protected area","Is the protected area boundary marked on the ground (land/sea)?","B.   Some of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!B50:D55,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E14,Responses!C50:E55,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.3,0.89999999999999991,0.3,"We do have marked boundary on the ground but on the sea we know our sea boundary. This question is not only about people in the PA knowing the boundary - but do outsiders know the boundary (no go zones etc) because they are clearly marked?","We want our sea boundary to be demacarted on a map and distributed to the communities so they are aware of the sea boundary","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6b. Map of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are marked on a map (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.4,0.4,0]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are recorded in a GIS format (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the protected area ","What proportion of land owners (e.g. customary landowning adults) are aware of the protected area boundaries? ","D.   Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E17,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.5,1.5,1.5,"Adult customary landowners are well aware of the protected area boundaries","The protected land boundaries must be made known to everyone including children. This will be made possible through continuous education and awareness.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area know the location of the boundary?","C.   Many (51-75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E18,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"There was a boundary awareness program conducted a few years back with the surrounding villages about the protected area.","The protected land boundaries must be made known to everyone including children. This will be made possible through continuous education and awareness.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area respect the boundary?","B.   Some (25-50%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E19,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.4,1.2000000000000002,0.4,"Due to increase population, the upcoming generation does not have respect for the protected area boundary","The protected land boundaries must be made known to everyone including children. This will be made possible through continuous education and awareness.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government","Most or all relevant Local Level Governments are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,0.3,"The relevant  LLGs area aware of the boundaries of the protected area","Engage the relevant LLGs governments to assist with the awareness of the protected area boundary","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level","Most or all of the relevant District level representatives are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,0.3,"The relevant Districts level representatives area aware of the boundaries of the protected area","Engage the relevant Diastricts level representatives to assist with the awareness of the protected area boundary","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7. Management planning","Is there a management plan or similar and is it being implemented?","C. A management plan or similar exists but it is being partly implemented because of funding constraints or other problems",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!B62:D67,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E22,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"There is a management plan exist but due to lack of funding, most of the rules and regulations can not implemented. Law breakers can not be fined. Are you sure this is for Zone 1 or is it just for Laugum. If the questions are for the Zone, then maybe there is no management plan - please just clarify this.","We need funding to fully implement our management plan","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan","The management planning process for the protected area provides adequate and equal opportunity for key people (i.e. includes government, NGO, business etc) to have input into the management plan and to influence it (Do not include customary landowners in this question) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"The management planning process for the protected area fully engaged all the relevant government reps, NGOs and business to have input into the management plan and to influenec it Response here probably depends on reponse for Q7.","The management plan need to be reviewed by all revelant bodies again","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan","There is an established schedule and process for people to regularly review and update the management plan (i.e. including agreed vision, objectives, actions etc) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"The management is not effectively managed","The management plan should be regularly review and update","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee","The Management Committee is formed and meets to discuss issues related to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"The management committees is not that effective Is this the management committee for the whole lagoon - please check these questions to make sure that you are answering for the entire Zone 1 and not just Laugum.","The protected area needs a effective management committees to implement the management plan","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","7d. Are there clear decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee?","Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision making are clearly documented (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"The protected area is managed by all the clan leader. The decision making involves the women and young girls too. Gender equality is practied in the community level","We need independent clan leaders who are not bias with their decision making. Most of our clan leaders who are engaged and paid by the RD Cannery, Fishing Company and Logging companies do not fight for our rights to protect our area from damage caused by those comapnies","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee","Are the structures and processes for decision-making in the protected area well understood?","B.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are little known or understood by the protected area owners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D27,Responses!B68:D73,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E27,Responses!C68:E73,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"The structure and processes in relation to management committees of the protected area decision are mostly known by minority of the elders in the community not so much of the younger generation","The decision making and structure and process in relation to the management committee must be made known to the younger generation. They are the next management committees to manage the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions","The decisions of the Management Committee/managers are made available to all people in the protected area community (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Only the clan leaders in the protected area have aany decision of the Management Committees","The approach must be change in the future. Any decision of the management committees must be made known to everyone in the protected.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan","Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented?","A.  No regular work plan exists ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D29,Responses!B74:D79,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E29,Responses!C74:E79,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There is no regular workplan","We need a regular workplan for our protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory","Do you have enough information to manage the area?","B.  There is poor information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) and this makes management difficult",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D30,Responses!B80:D85,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E30,Responses!C80:E85,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"There is lack of current information for the whole of the protected area. Due to the increased population, the coastal development and the industries next to the protected area this has given rise to major concern about our marine resources. ","The protected area needs to under go full research survey to make stock of all the marine resoucres in the protected area. This will assist with the review of the management plan and what marine resources needs more protection.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers","Are there enough people employed or paid to manage the protected area?","A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D31,Responses!B86:D91,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E31,Responses!C86:E91,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"None due to lack of proper management and funding","We need an effective management committees and paid rangers to carry out their duties.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on the protected area","Are there enough unpaid people (community or customary landowners) helping to manage the protected area?","B.  There are a few people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is inadequate to meet management needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D32,Responses!B92:D972,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E32,Responses!C92:E972,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"The unpaid people are the clan leaders and their sons who assist in protecting the area and  still practiced the traditional way of conservation.","Due to inadequate fundings most of the management needs could not be met. We need funding to assist with the management of the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills","Do the people involved in managing the protected area have the necessary knowledge and skills?","C. Knowledge and skills are good, but could be improved to better manage the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D33,Responses!B98:D103,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E33,Responses!C98:E103,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"We need capacity building to add value to our traditional skills and knowledge we acquired from our ancestors to protect our area.","We need more training to assist us better manage our protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","12. Current budget","Is the current budget sufficient (from any source)?","A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D34,Responses!B104:D109,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E34,Responses!C104:E109,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No budget allocated for the management of the protected","In the future we want to engage with organisation who can assist us with fundings to manage our protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ","Is the budget secure (e.g. over the next 2-5 years)?","A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D35,Responses!B110:D115,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E35,Responses!C110:E115,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There is no secure budget to manage the protected area since it was declared as a protected area","In the future we need secure budget to assist manage the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ","Is the budget managed to meet important management needs?","B.  Budget management is poor and constrains management effectiveness",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D36,Responses!B116:D121,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E36,Responses!C116:E121,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F36=\"NA\",\" \",F36*H36)","v":1},"No budget management Response to this question should be NOT RELEVANT - as there is no budget - please change the score on the pull down menu.","In the future we want to be engaged on a financial training to assist us with whatever funds we have to manage our protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities sufficient for management needs?","A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D37,Responses!B122:D127,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E37,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There are no equipment and facilities for management needs","In the future we want equipments and facilities to assist us manage the protected effectively.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities adequately maintained?","A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D38,Responses!B128:D133,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E38,Responses!C128:E133,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F38=\"NA\",\" \",F38*H38)","v":0},"No facilities no maintenance If there is NO equipment/facilities then response to the question is NOT relevant. Please reconsider and change."]
["Process","16. Law enforcement","Can people (e.g. rangers or customary landowners – those with responsibility for managing the area) enforce protected area rules well enough?","B.  There is some human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are big gaps or deficiencies",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D39,Responses!B134:D139,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E39,Responses!C134:E139,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"The clan leaders are mandated to enforce protected area rules since we do not have effective management committees in place as yet. One of the bigges constraints is the lack of a boat to assist us in undertaking monitoring and survailance in the protected area","We need more training for rangers to manage our protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement","How good is the coordination between the protected area Management Committee/managers and other groups who assist with law enforcement?","B.  There is some effort to coordinate, but this does not work well",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D40,Responses!B140:D145,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E40,Responses!C140:E145,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"The protected area is managed by the clan leaders due ineffectiveness of the management committees. There is little cordination but this does not work well.","We need effective management committees form for better cordination bewteen the protected and the management committees and the law enforcement groups","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes","Are there process to solve disputes related to the protected area, and do people know about these processes?","B.  Some of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known, but others are not",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D41,Responses!B146:D151,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E41,Responses!C146:E151,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"If there was a well management committees formed it will then assist made known to the community about the process to solve disputes related to the protected area. ","The protected area needs continuous education and awareness on the relevant dispute resolution processes","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process","How suitable are the processes for resolving disputes or disagreements related to the protected area?","B.  Dispute resolution processes are not suitable for solving protected area-related disputes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D42,Responses!B152:D157,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E42,Responses!C152:E157,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"There has to be continuous awareness on the processes of resolving disputes within the protected area. Currently the disputes we have are with the RD Canning and the fishing company for the continuous noise pollution created by the fishing vessels, water blast and oil spilled into the sea. Our grieveness are heard by the companies through our clan leaders. ","In the future we want to work with relevant government bodies and NGOs to conduct more awareness on the dispute resolution process","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ","How often do dispute resolution processes succeed in resolving protected area-related disputes?","B.  Some disputes are resolved (e.g. up to one-third of disputes), but most remain unresolved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D43,Responses!B158:D163,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E43,Responses!C158:E163,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"Our clan leaders are the ones who come together and resolve disputes within our protected area involving the local community. But when it involves bigger companies most of their resolutions are biased. The clan leaders listened to the companies because they are paid by the bigger companies and nothing is resolved. This is the biggest threat we have currently with our clan leaders.","We need an effective management committees form to effectively resolved our disputes within the protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers","Are incidents of law breaking dealt with according to the rules/ law/ regulations?","A.  Prosecution/dealing with law often does not follow the rules/law/regulations",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D44,Responses!B164:D169,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E44,Responses!C164:E169,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"The rules and regulation in the management plan is not effective to apply on law breakers","Effective management plan ","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers","All people are treated equally in relation to charges/prosecution for breaching protected area rules/laws/regulations (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,0.5,"The rules and regulation in the management plan is not effective to apply on law breakers Question is about fairness - are all people treated the same??","Effective management plan ","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness","Are systems (e.g. patrols, permits, signage etc) in place to control access by ‘outsiders’ and resource use in the protected area ","A.    Protection systems/law enforcement (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but are required",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D46,Responses!B170:D175,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E46,Responses!C170:E175,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"None of these systems are in placed to control access resource use the outsiders. No signages put to inform the community about the boundary, rules and regulations of the protected area.","We need the system inplace to control access by outsiders and resources in the protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents","If people know of a threat to the protected area do they report this to the Management Committee/ authority?","B.    Sometimes it is reported, but most times not",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D47,Responses!B176:D181,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E47,Responses!C72:E77,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"Sometimes the incidents are reported to the clan leaders but most times not ","The management committees has to be effective for proper reporting of threat in the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety","Do protected area staff/people doing work or looking after the area have safe working conditions and does management prioritise safety? ","C.    The working environment for staff and community members is good, but improvements could be made",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D48,Responses!B182:D187,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E48,Responses!C182:E187,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"We do not have an effective management committee for the protected area therefore the safety of staff is not considered paramount at the moment.","The review of the management plan will include the safe working conditions of the management committees","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","19. Research ","Is there a programme of management-orientated survey, inventory and research work?","B.     There is some survey, inventory or research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D49,Responses!B188:D193,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E49,Responses!C188:E193,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"There have been some community projects conducted by NGOs but not to the interest of the protected area only the mangrove planting along the coastline of the protected by WWF.","We want the survey, inventory or research work to be included in the management plan to be conducted after every 5 years in the proitected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","20. Monitoring and evaluation (of management activities)","Are management activities monitored, evaluated and acted on (or adapted)?","A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D50,Responses!B194:D199,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E50,Responses!C194:E199,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Since the establishment of the WMAs there was no effective management committees to monitor and evaluate the protected area.","We need an effective management committees to monitor and evaluate the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","21. Resource management ","Is active resource management of biodiversity and cultural activities (e.g. gardens, fishing areas, resource extraction sites) being undertaken?","B.  Some active management of the protected area is being implemented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D51,Responses!B200:D205,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E51,Responses!C200:E205,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Within the protected area we zone it into no take zone, limited fishing gears used zone and communnal zone. These zones assist us to manage the resources we have within the protected area.","We need funding for rangers ro actively monitor these zones","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","22. Climate change ","Is the protected area consciously managed to adapt to climate change?","A.  There have been no efforts to consider adaptation to climate change in management of the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D52,Responses!B206:D211,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E52,Responses!C206:E211,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F52=\"NA\",\" \",F52*H52)","v":0},"Some of our islands are sinking within the protected area as a result of climate change. Some parts of coast lines are eaten away by the sea.","We need more awareness on climate change and how best we can adapt to the changes occuring around us as a result of climate change","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to prevent carbon loss?","B.  Preventing carbon loss has been considered in general terms, but is not reflected in management of the protected area ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D53,Responses!B212:D217,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E53,Responses!C212:E217,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F53=\"NA\",\" \",F53*H53)","v":0.5},"Carbon loss is a something new to us. We do not cleary understand what is carbon loss and how we will benefit from it","We need more awareness on carbon loss","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to encourage carbon storage?","A.  Carbon storage has not been considered in management of the protected area.",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D54,Responses!B218:D223,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E54,Responses!C218:E223,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F54=\"NA\",\" \",F54*H54)","v":0},"Carbon Storage is something new to us. We do not cleary understand what is carbon storage and how we will benefit from it","We need more awareness on Carbon Storage","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known","The ecosystem services provided by the protected area are well known (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,{"$f":"IF(F55=\"NA\",\" \",F55*H55)","v":0.5},"Our protected area provides us with Ecosystem goods and services Would have been good to know what services in particular (remember, supporting, provisioning, regulating and cultural services - refer to Glossary if people are in doubt).","We need more awareness on the goods and services the environment provides and we must take ownership of our protected area and look after it.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ","Does management of the protected area take into account actions to enhance the protected area’s provision of ecosystem services?","B.    A few ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D56,Responses!B224:D229,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E56,Responses!C224:E229,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"The ecosystems provide us with building materials, food and freshwater, traditional herbs, recreational sites including sacred sites. We are trying our best to manage these services and goods to ensure their continued delivery","Continuous awareness on the importance of protecting our ecosystems to ensure they continue delivery","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","25. Education and awareness ","Is there a planned education and awareness programme about the protected area and linked to its objectives and needs?","B.    There is a limited and irregular education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D57,Responses!B230:D235,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E57,Responses!C82:E87,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"There are no planned education and awareness programme for the protected area","There should be a planned education and awareness programme inserted in the management plan","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","26. Government neighbours and commercial neighbour cooperation","Is there co-operation with adjacent government neighbours and commercial land/water users? ","B.  There is contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users but only some cooperation on management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D58,Responses!B236:D241,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E58,Responses!C83:E88,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"The commercial neighbours such as RD Cannery, logging and fishing company have some form  of arrangement to engage the clan leaders of the protected area to represent the protected area community. There is limited coorporation with adjacent government.","The commercial land /sea users and the relevant government bodies should work together for the betterment of the protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators","Do commercial tour operators cooperate and contribute to protected area management and provide benefits to the community?","A.  There is little or no contact between the Management Committee/ managers and tourism operators using the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D59,Responses!B242:D247,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E59,Responses!C242:E247,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F59=\"NA\",\" \",F59*H59)","v":0},"The protected area management committees is not that effective to create that dialogue with the commercial tour operators","The management committees has to be effective to engage with such commercial operators to benefit the protected area community by providing tour guides to the tourist","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","28. Fees","If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?","A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D60,Responses!B248:D253,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E60,Responses!C248:E253,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F60=\"NA\",\" \",F60*H60)","v":0},"There is no effectiveness of the protected area management committees to apply the fees to the outsiders","The protected area management committees has to be formed for such fees to be collected to assist with the daily management of the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services","Are visitor facilities and services adequate?","A.  There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D61,Responses!B254:D259,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E61,Responses!C86:E91,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There is none of such facilities in the protected area.","We want such facilities in the protected area in the future","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners","Do customary landowners, who reside in or regularly use the protected area, have input into management decisions?","C.   Customary landowners directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management, but their involvement could be improved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D62,Responses!B260:D265,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E62,Responses!C260:E265,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F62=\"NA\",\" \",F62*H62)","v":2},"Our clan leaders are the once representing the protected area community to make relevant decision relating to the management","We want effective protected area  management committees","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","31. Local communities and others with access or user ‘rights’","Do local communities and other rights’ holders living in or near the protected area, have input into relevant management decisions?","C.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ contribute to some relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, but their involvement could be improved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D63,Responses!B266:D271,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E63,Responses!C88:E93,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"Local communities within the protected area also contributed relevant decision relating to mangement of the protected area.","Make Awareness on the access user rights to the communities in the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to the protected area","What percentage of women in the protected area community are involved in decision making about the protected area?","D.    Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D64,Responses!B272:D277,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E64,Responses!C89:E94,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.25,0.75,0.75,"In the community women are involved or participate in any decision making.","Involve more women and young girls to participate in the decision making and young women should be educated about thre changes happening for to make inform decision decision","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of protected area decisions","Women are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Women and young girls fully participate in any decision in relation to protected area management  ","There has to be continuous educationa and awareness on the importance of the protected area so women can be fully participant about protecting the area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making","How much influence do women have on protected-area related decisions?","C.    Women can often influence protected area decisions",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D66,Responses!B278:D283,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E66,Responses!C278:E283,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,0.5,"Women have great influence in any decision making of the protected area management ","When our  women are fully educated about the importtance of protected area. They will have great influence in the decision making of the protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of protected area decisions","Young people (under 20 years of age) are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Mostly adults men amd women and most importatntly the clan leaders of each clans","There has to be continuous  education and awareness made to our younger generatin especially to schools surrounding the protected area.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making","How much influence do young people (under 20 years of age) have on protected-area related decisions?","B.    Young people have a small influence on protected area decisions ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D68,Responses!B284:D289,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E68,Responses!C93:E98,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,{"$f":"G68*H68","v":0.75},{"$f":"IF(F68=\"not relevant\",\" \",F68*H68)","v":0.25},"Young people have small influence in the decision making of the protected area.","There has to be continuous  education and awareness made to our younger generatin especially to schools surrounding the protected area. This will assist our children to understand the impportance of the protected area and why we should protect.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in the full range of protected area decisions ","There is opportunity for any person or group in the protected area and wider community to become involved in protected area decision making (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"There is opportunity for any person or group in the protected area to be involved in protected area decision","Continuous awareness on the importance of the protected area to the surrounding communities in the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","31g. There is communication and trust between the customary landowners and …","1. CEPA (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,0.5,"The community has trust for CEPA in assisting them with the esblishment of their PA.","Continuous dialogue with CEPA to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output",null,"2. Provincial Government (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,0.5,"From time to time provincial govt do come in to provide assistance in education and awareness on issues affecting them.","Continuous dialogue with Madang Provincial Government relevant offices to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output",null,"3. Local Level Government (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"They built the trust with the community","Continuous dialogue with Madang Local Level Government  Office to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output",null,"4.  District representatives (e.g. District Development Authority) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"They built the trust with the community","Continuous dialogue with Madang District Office to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output",null,"5. Ward representatives (e.g. Ward Development Committee) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"They built the trust with the community","Continuous dialogue with Ward representatives to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output",null,"6. NGOs (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"The NGOs such as WWF,WORLD VISION, BISMARK RAMU, MERI SAVE HAUS have been working with the community and the community has built the trust with them","Continuous dialogue with NGOs to built the trust with protected area communities","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare","Programmes are being implemented to improve community/customary landowners’ welfare, while conserving protected area resources (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Yes meaning when the protected area area was first established not now.","Continuous awareness on the community welfare programmes","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","31i. Level of support","The local community and customary landowners actively support the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"The local community and customary landowners are actively supporting the protected area by creating zones in the protected with limited user rights","Continuous awareness on the importance of the protected area ","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits","Are the protected area and related conservation and development projects providing sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners, e.g. income/ employment?","C.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects make a moderate contribution to livelihoods (many people benefit)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D78,Responses!B290:D295,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E78,Responses!C290:E295,2,FALSE)","v":2},{"$f":"IF(F78=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,2,"There area few sustainable livelihood projects implemented by NGOs that benefit the protected area communities","Continuous awareness on the livelihood benfits to the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness","How effective are benefit-sharing arrangements in delivering benefits to all in the protected area?","C.  Benefits have been received, but they are less than what was decided",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D79,Responses!B296:D301,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E79,Responses!C296:E301,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,{"$f":"IF(F79=\"NA\",\" \",F79*H79)","v":1},"Benefits sharing in the protected area is not to our level of expection. People with higher status benefit more than others","Continuous awareness","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits","Are the livelihood benefits from the protected area equitably shared?","C.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among most groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D80,Responses!B302:D307,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E80,Responses!C302:E307,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,{"$f":"IF(F80=\"NA\",\" \",F80*H80)","v":0.5},"Everyone in the protected area benefits from the distribution of livelihoods benefits","Continuous awareness","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years","There has been an improvement in livelihood outcomes for the community over the past five years? (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D81,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D81,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"There have been some improvement on the livelihood outcomes in the protected area communities",null,"customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","33. Threats","Are the threats to the main values of the protected area being effectively addressed?","B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D82,Responses!B308:D313,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E82,Responses!C108:E113,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"The threats to the values are are managed by the clan leaders at minimal level",null,"customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)","Have the requirements for connectivity (i.e. direct linkages to other natural ecosystems) been assessed and implemented?","C.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and some actions have been taken, but not sufficient to achieve functional connectivity",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D83,Responses!B314:D319,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E83,Responses!C314:E319,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F83=\"NA\",\" \",F83*H83)","v":2},"Connectivity is not fully aware or understood by the coummunities in the protected area.","Need more education and awareness on threats to the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values","What is the condition of the important natural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","B.  Some natural values are being severely degraded ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D84,Responses!B320:D325,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E84,Responses!C320:E325,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,{"$f":"IF(F84=\"NA\",\" \",F84*H84)","v":1},"Due to increase population in the protected area and usage of unsustainable fishing methods in the protected area, some natural values have been degraded","The management plan has to be made effective inorder for the natural values to be protected ","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of natural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F85=\"NA\",\" \",F85*H85)","v":1},"As far as we know there was a recent research done in 2013 by French Research Team in the Madang Lagoon. There were new species of invertebrates identified and named ","A research has to be conducted in Madang Laogoon for a stock asseeement on the resources we have left. The last reseach was done 10 years ago.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to natural values (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F86=\"NA\",\" \",F86*H86)","v":1},"One of the threats is the increase population and the management programmes is the awareness of unwanted pregnancies in the communities and schools","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management","Activities to maintain natural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,{"$f":"IF(F87=\"NA\",\" \",F87*H87)","v":1},"One of the actions implemented to protect the natural values is the contonuous monitoring of the restricted zones and limited user rights aceess by the local unpaid rangers","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values","What is the condition of the important cultural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","B.  Some cultural values are being severely degraded ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D88,Responses!B326:D331,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E88,Responses!C326:E331,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"IF(F88=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,{"$f":"IF(F88=\"NA\",\" \",F88*H88)","v":1},"Some of our sacred sites are not respected by the intermarriages, our traditional practices and languages area slowing dying due to Westernise influences","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of cultural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Most of our cultural values are degraded due toWestern influences. Our tradional customs are no longer practiced in some communities. The traditional skills and knowledge are no longer passed on to younger generation","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to cultural values (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Within the protected area some communities have realized the need to maintain their cultural values by teaching/educating the younger generation of the values","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values","Activities to maintain cultural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"The activties are not effectively implemented due to the ineffectivetiness of the management plan","In order for NGOs, Government bodies and Donors to implement projects and programmes in the protected area. They will need information of the protected area and therefore a survey research on socio economic, scientific and other relelated surveys have to be conducted to gather information.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species","Has the status of key species changed over the last five (5) years?","A.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D92,Responses!B332:D337,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E92,Responses!C118:E123,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"IF(F92=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,0,"Due to increase population and no proper awareness the conservation status of key species is worsened ","A research has to be conducted for stock assessment in the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats","Has the status of habitats changed over the last five (5) years?","A.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D93,Responses!B338:D343,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E93,Responses!C343:E348,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Due to increase coastal development and industries surrounding the protected area, most of the conservation status of habitats is worsened","A research has to be conducted for stock assessment in the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA","What support has CEPA provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","B.  A little",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D94,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E94,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.2,"No support seen at the moment","Strengthen the relationship between government bodies, NGOs and Donors and Business houses for collarborative effort the protect the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)","What support has/have the provincial government(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","B.  A little",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D95,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E95,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.2,"No support seen at the moment","Strengthen the relationship between government bodies, NGOs and Donors and Business houses for collarborative effort the protect the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)","What support has/have the District(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","B.  A little",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D96,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E96,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.2,"No support seen at the moment","Strengthen the relationship between government bodies, NGOs and Donors and Business houses for collarborative effort the protect the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)","What support has/have the LGG(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","B.  A little",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D97,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E97,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.2,"No support seen at the moment","Strengthen the relationship between government bodies, NGOs and Donors and Business houses for collarborative effort the protect the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs","What support have NGOs provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","D.  Sufficient",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D98,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E98,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0.60000000000000009,"NGOs have  provide support to enhance the management of the protected area with projects implemented in the protected area","Strengthen the relationship between government bodies, NGOs and Donors and Business houses for collarborative effort the protect the protected area","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
[null,"TOTAL",null,null,null,{"$f":"SUM(F3:F98)","v":92},{"$f":"SUM(G3:G98)","v":224},null,{"$f":"SUM(I3:I98)","v":155.19999999999996},{"$f":"SUM(J3:J98)","v":57.750000000000014}]

{"sheet":"Responses","index":12,"n_rows":348,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":348,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Question",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Condition","Trend",null,"select"]
[1,"select","blank","blank","select","blank",null,"Very good","Increasing",null,"A lot",2]
[null,"A. The protected area is not gazetted/approved by national or provincial government or has not been established through ‘other effective means’","A",0,"Yes",1,null,"Good","Stable",null,"Some",1]
[null,"B. There is agreement that the protected area should be established but the process has not begun","B ",1,"No",0,null,"Fair","Decreasing",null,"None",0]
[null,"C. The protected area is in the process of being established, but the process is incomplete","C",2,"Not relevant","NA",null,"Poor","Don't know",null,"Don't know","DK"]
[null,"D. The protected area has been formally gazetted/approved by the national or provincial government or established through ‘other effective means’","D",3,null,null,null,"Don't know"]
[]
[2,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area to guide management","A",0]
[null,"B. The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives","B ",1]
[null,"C. The protected area has agreed objectives, and is only partly managed according to these objectives","C",2,null,null,"research & monitoring"]
[null,"D. The protected area has agreed objectives and is fully managed to meet these objectives","D",3,null,null,"planning documents & government data"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"staff experience"]
[3,"select","blank","blank",null,null,"external expert opinion"]
[null,"A. There are no regulations or customary laws or agreements for managing land and marine use and activities in the protected area ","A",0,null,null,"customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
[null,"B. Some regulations or customary laws for managing land/sea use and activities in the protected area exist but there are many weaknesses","B ",1,null,null,"other (specify)"]
[null,"C. Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist, but there are some weaknesses or gaps","C",2]
[null,"D. Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management","D",3]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"threat severity"]
["3a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. Protected area-related rules/laws/regulations are not clearly defined and documented","A",0,null,null,"select"]
[null,"B. Some protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, but there are some important gaps","B ",1,null,null,"Very high",4]
[null,"C. Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, with no important gaps","C",2,null,null,"High",3]
[null,"D. Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented and anyone who wants to see/review/or know this information is able to do so","D",3,null,null,"Medium",2]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Low",1]
["3b","select","blank","blank",null,null,"none",0]
[null,"A. The customary landowners/local community do not have any protected area-related user/access rights relating to accessing resources from the protected area (i.e. ability to hunt, fish or gather)","A",0]
[null,"B. Some of the rights to use/access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented","C",2]
[null,"D. Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, and anyone who wants to see or learn about this information is able to do so","D",3]
[]
["3c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[]
[4,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the needs of the protected area and the resulting land/sea uses and policies harm the protected area ","A",0]
[null,"B. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the long-term needs of the protected area, but the resulting land/sea uses do not harm the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area takes into account some of the long-term needs of the protected area, and the resulting land/sea uses partially support the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D. Planning for land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area fully takes into account the long-term needs of the protected area and seeks to support the protected area","D",3]
[]
[5,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), and this makes achieving the major management objectives very difficult ","A",0]
[null,"B.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), but we are working to make it better (e.g. agreements with adjacent land/sea owners for wildlife corridors, or improving water catchment management)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   The protected area size and boundaries (i.e. the design) are okay and allow us to achieve our objectives, but could be better (e.g. in relation to large-scale ecological processes or minimising threats)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Protected area size and the boundaries (i.e. the design) are very good and we can achieve our objectives","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["6a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   None or only a small section of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground ","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Most of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","C",2]
[null,"D.   All of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground (this could include a fence)","D",3]
[]
["6def","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[]
[7,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no management plan for the protected area, or the management plan was produced a long time ago and is not being implemented","A",0]
[null,"B.  A management plan or similar is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A management plan or similar exists but it is being partly implemented because of funding constraints or other problems","C",2]
[null,"D. A management plan or similar exists and is being fully implemented","D",3]
[]
["7e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are not known or understood by the protected area owners","A",0]
[null,"B.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are little known or understood by the protected area owners","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are mostly known and understood by the protected area owners","C",2]
[null,"D.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are fully known and understood by the protected area owners","D",3]
[]
[8,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  No regular work plan exists ","A",0]
[null,"B.  A regular work plan exists but only some of the activities are implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A regular work plan exists, and many activities are implemented","C",2]
[null,"D. A regular work plan exists, and all activities are implemented","D",3]
[]
[9,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no information available about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological process and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is poor information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is good Information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) for most areas of planning and decision making","C",2]
[null,"D. There is very good Information on the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) to support all areas of planning and decision making ","D",3]
[]
[10,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some paid staff/people who are responsible for important management activities, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. Paid staff numbers are good and support management of the protected area, but this is below what is required to meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. Paid staff/people numbers are very good and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
["10a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no community members or customary landowners helping to manage the protected area, but they are needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are a few people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is below what is required to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. There are plenty of people helping to manage the protected area and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
[11,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Knowledge and skills needed to manage the protected area are very poor or inadequate","A",0]
[null,"B.  Knowledge and skills are poor relative to the needs of the protected area","B ",1]
[null,"C. Knowledge and skills are good, but could be improved to better manage the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D. Knowledge and skills to manage the protected area are very good and they meet the management needs of the area","D",3]
[]
[12,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some money, but this is a serious problem that limits management effectiveness and should be increased to fully meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. The available budget is acceptable but could be increased to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. The available budget is sufficient and fully meets the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[]
[13,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is very little budget security, and the protected area could not meet its management needs without outside funding","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is a reasonably secure budget for regular operation of the protected area to enable it to meet its management needs, but many initiatives are reliant on outside funding","C",2]
[null,"D. There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs ","D",3]
[]
[14,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines management effectiveness ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Budget management is poor and constrains management effectiveness","B ",1]
[null,"C. Budget management is good but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D. Budget management is very good and meets management needs","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["15a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some equipment and facilities, but these are inadequate for most management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are sufficient equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake most management tasks, but there are some gaps","C",2]
[null,"D. There are very good equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake all management tasks","D",3]
[]
["15b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some occasional maintenance of equipment and facilities ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is much ongoing, basic maintenance of equipment and facilities ","C",2]
[null,"D. Equipment and facilities are fully maintained","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[16,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no effective human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are big gaps or deficiencies","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is acceptable human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are a few gaps or deficiencies","C",2]
[null,"D. There is excellent human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","D",3]
[]
["16a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no coordination","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some effort to coordinate, but this does not work well","B ",1]
[null,"C. Coordination is good, but with some occasional problems","C",2]
[null,"D. Coordination is very good","D",3]
[]
["16b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution and hence no documentation","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known","C",2]
[null,"D. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known and anyone who wants to see and review/discuss this information is able to do so","D",3]
[]
["16c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution","A",0]
[null,"B.  Dispute resolution processes are not suitable for solving protected area-related disputes","B ",1]
[null,"C. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for some protected area-related disputes, but not others","C",2]
[null,"D. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for most or all types of protected area-related disputes","D",3]
[]
["16d","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Almost never as very few people are aware of the processes and are able to use them","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some disputes are resolved (e.g. up to one-third of disputes), but most remain unresolved","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most disputes are resolved, but often there are some people who remain dissatisfied","C",2]
[null,"D. Almost all disputes are resolved and normally all people in the dispute are satisfied with the outcome","D",3]
[]
["16e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Prosecution/dealing with law often does not follow the rules/law/regulations","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but irregularities are common","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but there are occasional irregularities","C",2]
[null,"D. All incidents are properly handled according to the rules/law/regulations","D",3]
[]
[17,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Protection systems/law enforcement (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but are required","A",0]
[null,"B.    Protection systems/law enforcement are partially effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but law breaking is still common","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Protection systems/law enforcement are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, but there are still occasional cases of law breaking","C",2]
[null,"D.    Protection systems/law enforcement are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, so law breaking is very rare","D",3]
[]
["17a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    No – they keep quiet","A",0]
[null,"B.    Sometimes it is reported, but most times not","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most times it is reported, although sometimes not","C",2]
[null,"D.    Almost always reported in a timely manner, with very few exceptions","D",3]
[]
[18,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     The working environment for staff and community members is very poor","A",0]
[null,"B.     The working environment for staff and community members is poor ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The working environment for staff and community members is good, but improvements could be made","C",2]
[null,"D.    The working environment for staff and community members is very good as it is an important consideration for the protected area managers ","D",3]
[]
[19,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no survey, inventory or research work taking place in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some survey, inventory or research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is survey, inventory or research work but it is only partly directed towards the needs of protected area management ","C",2]
[null,"D.    There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey, inventory or research work, which is relevant to management needs","D",3]
[]
[20,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some unplanned and irregular monitoring and evaluation of the performance of management activities, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation, but results do not feed back into management","C",2]
[null,"D.    A good system of monitoring and evaluation exists, is well implemented and is used to adapt and improve management","D",3]
[]
[21,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no active resource management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values, but it is needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some active management of the protected area is being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. Many of the requirements for active management of the protected area are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed","C",2]
[null,"D. Requirements for active management of the protected area are being fully implemented","D",3]
[]
[22,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There have been no efforts to consider adaptation to climate change in management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some initial thought has taken place about likely impacts of climate change, but his has yet to be translated into management plans or actions","B ",1]
[null,"C. Limited plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, which may or may not be implemented.","C",2]
[null,"D. Detailed plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, and these are already being implemented. ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["23a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Preventing carbon loss has not been considered in protected area management","A",0]
[null,"B.  Preventing carbon loss has been considered in general terms, but is not reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures to prevent carbon loss","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to prevent carbon loss","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["23b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Carbon storage has not been considered in management of the protected area.","A",0]
[null,"B.  Carbon storage has been considered in general terms, but is not significantly reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["24a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     No ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed","A",0]
[null,"B.    A few ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","C",2]
[null,"D.    All ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","D",3]
[]
[25,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","A",0]
[null,"B.    There is a limited and irregular education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","B ",1]
[null,"C.   There is an education and awareness programme, but it only partly meets the needs of protected area management and could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   There is an appropriate and effective education and awareness programme linked to achieving the protected area’s objectives and needs","D",3]
[]
[26,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users but only some cooperation on management","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, but only some co-operation on management","C",2]
[null,"D. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, and substantial (or full) co-operation on management","D",3]
[]
[27,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no contact between the Management Committee/ managers and tourism operators using the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the protected area Management Committee/managers and tourism operators, and this is confined largely to administrative or regulatory matters, with few benefits to the customary landowners","B ",1]
[null,"C.  There is contact and limited co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide some benefits to the customary landowners","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is contact and good co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide long-term benefits to the customary landowners","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[28,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected","A",0]
[null,"B.    Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its surroundings","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","C",2]
[null,"D.   Fees are collected and make a good contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[29,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need","A",0]
[null,"B.  Visitor facilities and services are poor - they do not meet the needs of current visitor levels ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Visitor facilities and services are good – they meet the needs of the current visitor levels but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.  Visitor facilities and services are very good for current levels of visitation","D",3]
[]
[30,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Customary landowners have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Customary landowners have some input into discussions relating to management, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Customary landowners directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Customary landowners fully participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, (e.g. outright ownership or co-management arrangement)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[31,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have some input into discussions relating to the management of the protected area, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ contribute to some relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, e.g. co-management","D",3]
[]
["31a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.     Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.    Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["31c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Women have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.     Women have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Women can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Women are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[]
["31e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Young people (under 20 years of age) have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.    Young people have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Young people can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Young people are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[]
[32,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The protected area does not deliver any livelihood benefits to local communities/ customary landowners (no people benefit)","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects exist, but are not significant contributors to livelihoods (only a few people benefit)","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects make a moderate contribution to livelihoods (many people benefit)","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is a major flow of sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners from activities associated with the protected area (most people benefit)","D",3]
[]
["32a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no benefit-sharing arrangements in place","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits have been received, but they are much less than what was decided","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits have been received, but they are less than what was decided","C",2]
[null,"D.  Benefits have been received and they are fully in line with, or even better than what was decided","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["32b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The livelihood benefits provided by the protected area are not shared equitably by the local communities/customary landowners","A",0]
[null,"B.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitable among only some groups and individuals in the local communities/ customary landowners ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among most groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","C",2]
[null,"D.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among all groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[33,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The threats to the main values are not being addressed by management","A",0]
[null,"B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Most of the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","C",2]
[null,"D.  All the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","D",3]
[]
[34,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The requirements for connectivity have not been assessed ","A",0]
[null,"B.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed but necessary actions have not been taken","B ",1]
[null,"C.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and some actions have been taken, but not sufficient to achieve functional connectivity","C",2]
[null,"D.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and necessary actions have been taken to achieve functional connectivity","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[35,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important natural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some natural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some natural values are being partly degraded, but the most important natural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Natural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[36,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important cultural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some cultural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some cultural values are being partly degraded, but the most important cultural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Cultural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[37,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable, but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of key species is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
[38,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of habitats is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","NA"]
["39abcde","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  None","A",0]
[null,"B.  A little","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some","C",2]
[null,"D.  Sufficient","D",3]

{"sheet":"ConditTrend (T9)","index":13,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,4]]}
["Detailed assessment of values (Condition & Trend) (Table 9)"]
["Key value ","Condition","Trend","Justification for the rating","Ways to improve the value",null,"Condition"]
["Values will be inserted from Table 3","Insert Score ","Insert Score","Insert text to explain the score or rating that was selected",null,null,"VG"]
[null,"Select from pull down menu","Select from pull down menu",null,null,null,"G"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Mangroves ecosystem"},"Fair","Decreasing","Due to increase population, mangroves overharvested for building materials as well as other uses. ","Nursery of mangrove seedlings and replanting them in degraded sites Mangrove restoration along the coastline ",null,"F"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B5","v":"Sago palms"},"Fair","Decreasing","Due to increase population, sago palms overharvested for building materials as well as other usage. ","Sago restoration in the wetlands",null,"P"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B6","v":"Historical sites (war relics and sacred sites)"},"Good","Stable","Most of the cultural and historical significants have not respected by this present generation. They do not understand the importance of protecting those values ","Make awareness on the importance of protecting the cultural and historical significant sites",null,"DK"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B7","v":"Coral reefs"},"Good","Decreasing","Unsustainable fishing practices causing damage to the coral reefs","Traditional practice of conserving the coral reefs by applying the temporal closure",null,"Score"]

{"sheet":"Recomm (T10)","index":14,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["Recommendations (Table 10)"]
["Recommendations",1,2,3,4,5,6]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Laugum Should this be Madang Lagoon Zone 1?"},"Please insert recommendations"]

{"sheet":"Str & Challenges (T11)","index":15,"n_rows":7,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":7,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["Strengths and Challenges (Table 11)"]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Laugum Should this be Madang Lagoon Zone 1?"},{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Laugum Should this be Madang Lagoon Zone 1?"},"Bagiai Example","Bagiai Example"]
["Strengths","Challenges","Strengths","Challenges"]
["NEED TO COMPLETE - this is for the facilitator and recorder to highlight what they have synthesised as the main strengths and challenges - these then go into the summary document.",null,"The protected area is on Karkar Island and there are relatively few threats and pressures from outside at present. It is an area of outstanding beauty with an active volcano, and steep slopes with a steep slope into the sea.","Maintaining the biodiversity values in the face of expanding landowner gardens, increased harvesting of wildlife and expansion of cocoa/copra plantations into the protected area. "]
[null,null,"The WMA is established and there is a relatively low level of settlement within the protected area. The traditional laws have been incorporated into the WMA and are generally followed, or mediation is undertaken to stop the activity. There is not much difference now than if the WMA had not been introduced, but the government laws can give more strength to the arrangements.","Addressing the impacts of climate change, which is a high level threat with observed changes including increased winds damaging the reefs, increased temperatures causing reef bleaching, and greater risk in travelling by boat across the ocean to other islands and Madang."]
[null,null,"People are closely linked to the land and feel that the land owns them rather than that they own the land.","Achieving effective outcomes with no resources or support from the government or any other organisations. The management committee has not functioned for a long time and there is a low level of awareness among the community members generally."]
[null,null,"Language is still strong, and there are cultural links to the land. Tok place (the language spoken in the village) has been recorded but only for the bible. There are two very different languages spoken on Karkar Island.","Stemming the loss of cultural knowledge (much traditional knowledge and practices are being lost compared to 50 years ago and there are no records of where the cultural places are) in the face of numerous outside influences."]

{"sheet":"GEF METT","index":16,"n_rows":164,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":164,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[46,0,46,6],[0,0,2,6],[3,0,3,6],[4,0,4,6],[5,0,5,6],[6,0,6,6],[8,0,8,6],[9,0,10,0],[9,1,9,5],[9,6,10,6],[34,0,34,6],[35,0,35,6],[58,1,58,5],[47,0,47,6],[48,1,48,5],[49,1,49,5],[50,1,50,5],[51,1,51,5],[52,1,52,5],[53,1,53,5],[54,1,54,5],[55,1,55,5],[56,1,56,5],[57,1,57,5],[78,1,78,6],[59,1,59,5],[60,1,60,5],[61,1,61,5],[62,1,62,5],[63,1,63,5],[64,1,64,5],[65,1,65,5],[66,1,66,5],[71,0,71,6],[74,1,74,6],[76,1,76,6],[102,1,102,6],[80,1,80,6],[82,1,82,6],[84,1,84,6],[86,1,86,6],[88,1,88,6],[90,1,90,6],[92,1,92,6],[94,1,94,6],[96,1,96,6],[98,1,98,6],[100,1,100,6],[126,1,126,6],[104,1,104,6],[106,1,106,6],[108,1,108,6],[110,1,110,6],[112,1,112,6],[114,1,114,6],[116,1,116,6],[118,1,118,6],[120,1,120,6],[122,1,122,6],[124,1,124,6],[150,1,150,6],[128,1,128,6],[130,1,130,6],[132,1,132,6],[134,1,134,6],[136,1,136,6],[138,1,138,6],[140,1,140,6],[142,1,142,6],[144,1,144,6],[146,1,146,6],[148,1,148,6],[155,0,155,6],[156,0,156,6],[157,1,157,4],[157,5,157,6],[158,1,158,4],[158,5,158,6],[162,1,162,4],[162,5,162,6],[163,1,163,4],[163,5,163,6],[159,1,159,4],[159,5,159,6],[160,1,160,4],[160,5,160,6],[161,1,161,4],[161,5,161,6]]}
["Tracking Tool for GEF-6 Biodiversity Projects"]
[]
[]
["GEF:6 Objective 1: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems"]
["SECTION II: Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool for Protected Areas "]
["Note: Please complete the management effectiveness tracking tool for EACH protected area that is the target of the GEF intervention to improve management effectiveness and create a new worksheet for each.\n\nStructure and content of the Tracking Tool - Objective 1. Section II:\nThe Tracking Tool has five data sheets:\nData Sheet 1: Records details of the assessment and some basic information about the site, such as name, size and location etc. \nData Sheet 2: Provides a specific list of threats that the project is addressing.\nData Sheet 3: Condition of biodiversity in the protected area.\nData Sheet 4: Assessment Form: the assessment is structured around 30 questions presented in table format which includes three columns for recording details of the assessment, all of which should be completed.\nData Sheet 5: Datasources and methods on which above assessments of condition of biodiversity in the protected area in Question 30 are based."]
["PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TOOL IS FOR USE ONLY IN GEF-6 PROJECTS"]
[]
["Data Sheet 1: Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites"]
["Questions","Please indicate your answers here",null,null,null,null,"Notes"]
[null,"Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion"]
["Name, affiliation and contact details for person responsible for completing the METT (email etc.)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C69","v":"Rita Goiye, Marine Officer"},null,null,null,null,"Please insert from Attributes Table 1, Q28a"]
["Date assessment carried out",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C75","v":"7-8 October 2021"},null,null,null,null,"Month DD, YYYY (e.g., May 12, 2010)"]
["Name of protected area",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Laugum Should this be Madang Lagoon Zone 1?"},null,null,{"$f":"'[1]METT4 PA attributes'!C5","v":0},{"$f":"'[1]METT4 PA attributes'!D5","v":0}]
["WDPA site code (these codes can be found on www.protectedplanet.net)",{"$f":"'[1]METT4 PA attributes'!B6","v":"xxx"}]
["Country",{"$f":"'[1]METT4 PA attributes'!B3","v":"Papua New Guinea"}]
["Location of protected area (province and if possible map reference)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C6","v":"Madang Province"}]
["Date of establishment ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C13","v":"Not formally established. Informal agreements in place???"}]
["Ownership details (please choose 1-4) ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C25","v":"Customary Landowners"},null,null,null,null,"1:  State\n2:  Private\n3:  Community\n4:  Other"]
["Management Authority",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C31","v":"The PA management committee was formed earlier but its not effective to date (Does this mean there is a Mg'mt Committee for the whole zone or just for Laugum - need to be clear here)"}]
["Size of protected area (ha)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C15","v":"Can you give an estimate of how big this area is?"}]
["Number of Permanent staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C37","v":"No"}]
["Number of Temporary staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C38","v":"No"}]
["Annual budget (US$)  for recurrent (operational) funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C41","v":0}]
["Annual budget (US$) for project or other supplementary funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C44","v":0}]
["What are the main values for which the area is designated",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C48","v":"Mangroves ecosystem"},null,null,null,null,"Add other values listed in attributes,Table 1, Q22."]
["List the two primary protected area management objectives in below:  "]
["Management objective 1",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C54","v":"To protect the area for future generations "}]
["Management objective 2",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C55","v":"To protect all the natural habitats, sacred and war relic sites including freshwater and lakes"}]
["No. of people involved in completing assessment",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C58","v":5}]
["Including: (please choose 1-8)",null,null,null,null,null,"1:  PA manager \n2:  PA staff\n3:  Other PA agency staff   \n4:  Donors\n5:  NGOs\n6: External experts\n7: Local community\n8: Other "]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 2: Key Biodiversity Indicators Used in This Protected Area"]
["At project start-up, identify and list up to five key biodiversity indicators that are monitored on a regular basis in the protected area; these indicators can relate to any/all trophic levels OR using other indicators. For each identified indicator, provide the current (project start-up) status of that indicator in numerical terms or with a short description (see examples below), as appropriate.   The examples are only illustrative and the protected area manager should use the indicators that currently are being monitored and/or will be monitored.\n\nAt project midterm and at project completion, provide updates on the status of the same indicator(s) identified at project start. \n\nThe overall condition of biodiversity -- based on the status of the indicator(s) identified here -- will be reported on in Question 30 in Data Sheet 4 (METT Assessment Form).  Therefore the inputs here require focused analysis to assess whether trends are positive, negative or neutral."]
["Indicator","Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion","Comments (optional)"]
["Example Indicator 1: Degree of soil compaction and/or erosion, as indicated by test sites compared with exclosures \nExample Indicator 2: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year, as indicated by plotting GPS points following fire events\nExample Indicator 3: Total area deforested or with forest significantly degraded, as indicated by satellite imagery\nExample Indicator 4: Estimated population of a key herbivore species as indicated by dung counts\nExample Indicator 5: Estimated population of a key carnivore species as indicated by camera traps \n","23 hectares",null,null,"35 hectares","50 hectares"]
["Indicator 1"]
["Indicator 2"]
["Indicator 3"]
["Indicator 4"]
["Indicator 5"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 3: Protected Areas Threats"]
["Please describe each threat that the project is directly addressing and provide the threat reduction indicator that the project is using from the project logframe to measure progress in reducing each threat.  An example is provided.   "]
["Questions","Please enter your answers in this column.",null,null,null,null,"Comments (optional)"]
["Example Threat","Illegal hunting for bushmeat"]
["Threat reduction indicator","Quantity of bushmeant coming from Xanadu PA sold in markets"]
["Baseline status"," At the start of project bushmeat sales in markets are 20 tons/per year (baseline upon which progress will be measured)."]
["Target","Quantities of bushmeat coming from \"Xanadu Protected Area\" sold in markets are reduced by 70% over the project period"]
["Midterm status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 14 tons per year."]
["End of project status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 12 tons per year."]
["Threat 1"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
["Threat 2"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 4: METT Assessment Form"]
["Please select a score from the drop-down list for each question. If a question is not applicable, then do not select a score and enter \"N/A\" in the comments space along with a brief explanation. "]
["Questions","Project start-up","Justification","Actions to improve management","Midterm","Project Completion","Criteria and Scores"]
["1. Legal status: Does the protected area have legal status (or in the case of private reserves is covered by a covenant or similar)? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K3","v":"There is no effective means to approve this to become legal."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L3","v":"The Government should approve  and legalise it for effective management "},null,null,"0: The protected area is not gazetted/covenanted\n1: There is agreement that the protected area should be gazetted/covenanted but the process has not yet begun\n2: The protected area is in the process of being gazetted/covenanted but the process is still incomplete (includes sites designated under international conventions, such as Ramsar, or local/traditional law such as community conserved areas, which do not yet have national legal status or covenant)\n3: The protected area has been formally gazetted/covenanted"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["2. Protected area regulations: Are appropriate regulations in place to control land use and activities (e.g. hunting)?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K4","v":"Say something about the agreed objectives - what are they, when were they agreed and by whom - e.g. in a plan or by traditional practices etc. There is no funded aid from the government to assist achieve our agreed objectives"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L4","v":"We need funding to manage our protected area"},null,null,"0: There are no regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area \n1: Some regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but these are major weaknesses\n2: Regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but there are some weaknesses or gaps\n3: Regulations for controlling inappropriate land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["3. Law \nEnforcement: Can staff (i.e. those with responsibility for managing the site) enforce protected area rules well enough?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K39","v":"The clan leaders are mandated to enforce protected area rules since we do not have effective management committees in place as yet. One of the bigges constraints is the lack of a boat to assist us in undertaking monitoring and survailance in the protected area"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L39","v":"We need more training for rangers to manage our protected area"},null,null,"0: The staff have no effective capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations \n1: There are major deficiencies in staff capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations (e.g. lack of skills, no patrol budget, lack of institutional support)\n2: The staff have acceptable capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations but some deficiencies remain\n3: The staff have excellent capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["4. Protected area objectives: Is management undertaken according to agreed objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K4","v":"Say something about the agreed objectives - what are they, when were they agreed and by whom - e.g. in a plan or by traditional practices etc. There is no funded aid from the government to assist achieve our agreed objectives"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L4","v":"We need funding to manage our protected area"},null,null,"0: No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area \n1: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives\n2: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is only partially managed according to these objectives\n3: The protected area has agreed objectives and is managed to meet these objectives"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["5. Protected area design: Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecological processes and water catchments of key conservation concern?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":3},1,{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L13","v":"Our protected area is slowing loosing away the pristine environment we once have due to industrial activities developed next to our protected area. We want tough management in place to protect our area from harmful damage from the surrounding industries. So in relation to Q4 this response seems to contradict the score that is given - here it is saying that the planning outside is contributing to losing the pristing environment - maybe need to justify score in 4 on the basis of the comments here."},null,null,"0: Inadequacies in protected area design mean achieving the major objectives of the protected area is very difficult\n1: Inadequacies in protected area design mean that achievement of major objectives is difficult but some mitigating actions are being taken (e.g. agreements with adjacent land owners for wildlife corridors or introduction of appropriate catchment management)\n2: Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes)\n3: Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["6. Protected area boundary demarcation: \nIs the boundary known and demarcated?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K14","v":"We do have marked boundary on the ground but on the sea we know our sea boundary. This question is not only about people in the PA knowing the boundary - but do outsiders know the boundary (no go zones etc) because they are clearly marked?"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L14","v":"We want our sea boundary to be demacarted on a map and distributed to the communities so they are aware of the sea boundary"},null,null,"0: The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users\n1: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users \n2: The boundary of the protected area is known by both the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated\n3: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7. Management plan: Is there a management plan and is it being implemented?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K22","v":"There is a management plan exist but due to lack of funding, most of the rules and regulations can not implemented. Law breakers can not be fined. Are you sure this is for Zone 1 or is it just for Laugum. If the questions are for the Zone, then maybe there is no management plan - please just clarify this."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L22","v":"We need funding to fully implement our management plan"},null,null,"0: There is no management plan for the protected area\n1: A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented\n2: A management plan exists but it is only being partially implemented because of funding constraints or other problems\n3: A management plan exists and is being implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.a Planning process: The planning process allows adequate opportunity for key stakeholders to influence the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K23","v":"The management planning process for the protected area fully engaged all the relevant government reps, NGOs and business to have input into the management plan and to influenec it Response here probably depends on reponse for Q7."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L23","v":"The management plan need to be reviewed by all revelant bodies again"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.b Planning process: There is an established schedule and process for periodic review and updating of the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K24","v":"The management is not effectively managed"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L24","v":"The management plan should be regularly review and update"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.c Planning process: The results of monitoring, research and evaluation are routinely incorporated into planning ",null,null,null,null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["8. Regular work plan: Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K29","v":"There is no regular workplan"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L29","v":"We need a regular workplan for our protected area"},null,null,"0: No regular work plan exists \n1: A regular work plan exists but few of the activities are implemented\n2: A regular work plan exists and many activities are implemented\n3: A regular work plan exists and all activities are implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["9. Resource inventory: Do you have enough information to manage the area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K30","v":"There is lack of current information for the whole of the protected area. Due to the increased population, the coastal development and the industries next to the protected area this has given rise to major concern about our marine resources. "},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L30","v":"The protected area needs to under go full research survey to make stock of all the marine resoucres in the protected area. This will assist with the review of the management plan and what marine resources needs more protection."},null,null,"0: There is little or no information available on the critical habitats, species and cultural values of the protected area \n1: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is not sufficient to support planning and decision making\n2: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is sufficient for most key areas of planning and decision making \n3: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  of the protected area is sufficient to support all areas of planning and decision making "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["10. Protection systems: \nAre systems in place to control access/resource use in the protected area?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K46","v":"None of these systems are in placed to control access resource use the outsiders. No signages put to inform the community about the boundary, rules and regulations of the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L46","v":"We need the system inplace to control access by outsiders and resources in the protected area."},null,null,"0: Protection systems (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/resource use\n1: Protection systems are only partially effective in controlling access/resource use\n2: Protection systems are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use \n3: Protection systems are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/ resource use \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["11. Research: Is there a programme of management-orientated survey and research work?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K51","v":"Within the protected area we zone it into no take zone, limited fishing gears used zone and communnal zone. These zones assist us to manage the resources we have within the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L51","v":"We need funding for rangers ro actively monitor these zones"},null,null,"0: There is no survey or research work taking place in the protected area\n1: There is a small amount of survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management\n2: There is considerable survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management \n3:There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey and research work, which is relevant to management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["12. Resource management: Is active resource management being undertaken?",null,null,null,null,null,"0: Active resource management is not being undertaken \n1: Very few of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  are being implemented\n2: Many of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed\n3: Requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being substantially or fully implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["13. Staff numbers: Are there enough people employed to manage the protected area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K31","v":"None due to lack of proper management and funding"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L31","v":"We need an effective management committees and paid rangers to carry out their duties."},null,null,"0: There are no staff  \n1: Staff numbers are inadequate for critical management activities\n2: Staff numbers are below optimum level for critical management activities\n3: Staff numbers are adequate for the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["14. Staff training: Are staff adequately trained to fulfill management objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K33","v":"We need capacity building to add value to our traditional skills and knowledge we acquired from our ancestors to protect our area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L33","v":"We need more training to assist us better manage our protected area"},null,null,"0: Staff lack the skills needed for protected area management\n1: Staff training and skills are low relative to the needs of the protected area\n2: Staff training and skills are adequate, but could be further improved to fully achieve the objectives of management\n3: Staff training and skills are aligned with the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["15. Current budget: Is the current budget sufficient?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K34","v":"No budget allocated for the management of the protected"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L34","v":"In the future we want to engage with organisation who can assist us with fundings to manage our protected area."},null,null,"0: There is no budget for management of the protected area\n1: The available budget is inadequate for basic management needs and presents a serious constraint to the capacity to manage\n2: The available budget is acceptable but could be further improved to fully achieve effective management\n3: The available budget is sufficient and meets the full management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["16. Security of budget: Is the budget secure?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K35","v":"There is no secure budget to manage the protected area since it was declared as a protected area"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L35","v":"In the future we need secure budget to assist manage the protected area"},null,null,"0: There is no secure budget for the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding  \n1: There is very little secure budget and the protected area could not function adequately without outside funding \n2: There is a reasonably secure core budget for regular operation of the protected area but many innovations and initiatives are reliant on outside funding\n3: There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["17. Management of budget: Is the budget managed to meet critical management needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K36","v":"No budget management Response to this question should be NOT RELEVANT - as there is no budget - please change the score on the pull down menu."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L36","v":"In the future we want to be engaged on a financial training to assist us with whatever funds we have to manage our protected area"},null,null,"0: Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines effectiveness (e.g. late release of budget in financial year)\n1: Budget management is poor and constrains effectiveness\n2: Budget management is adequate but could be improved\n3: Budget management is excellent and meets management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["18. Equipment: Is equipment sufficient for management needs?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K37","v":"There are no equipment and facilities for management needs"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L37","v":"In the future we want equipments and facilities to assist us manage the protected effectively."},null,null,"0: There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs\n1: There are some equipment and facilities but these are inadequate for most management needs\n2: There are equipment and facilities, but still some gaps that constrain management\n3: There are adequate equipment and facilities "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["19. Maintenance of equipment: Is equipment adequately maintained?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K38","v":"No facilities no maintenance If there is NO equipment/facilities then response to the question is NOT relevant. Please reconsider and change."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L38","v":0},null,null,"0: There is little or no maintenance of equipment and facilities\n1: There is some ad hoc maintenance of equipment and facilities \n2: There is basic maintenance of equipment and facilities \n3: Equipment and facilities are well maintained"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["20. Education and awareness: Is there a planned education programme linked to the objectives and needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K57","v":"There are no planned education and awareness programme for the protected area"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L57","v":"There should be a planned education and awareness programme inserted in the management plan"},null,null,"0: There is no education and awareness programme\n1: There is a limited and ad hoc education and awareness programme \n2: There is an education and awareness programme but it only partly meets needs and could be improved\n3: There is an appropriate and fully implemented education and awareness programme "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21. Planning for land and water use: Does land and water use planning recognise the protected area and aid the achievement of objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K9","v":"Yes the RD Cannery, Fishing Company as well as the logging company have taken into consideration the land/marine uses that they are using outside the protected area What about broader land use planning that considers environmental/PA issues? This could also include tourism planning etc. Score seems a bit high for me??"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L9","v":"The land/marine uses outside of the protected area must be made effective in the management plan to enforce some strict measures."},null,null,"0: Adjacent land and water use planning does not take into account the needs of the protected area and activities/policies are detrimental to the survival of the area \n1: Adjacent land and water use planning does not  takes into account the long term needs of the protected area, but activities are not detrimental the area \n2: Adjacent land and water use planning partially takes into account the long term needs of the protected area\n3: Adjacent land and water use planning fully takes into account the long term needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation: Planning and management in the catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provision for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. volume, quality and timing of water flow, air pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats.",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K10","v":"At the moment we do not have such planning as yet. "},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L10","v":"Maybe in the future we should consider that into the management plan"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21b. Land and water planning for connectivity: Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (e.g. to allow migratory fish to travel between freshwater spawning sites and the sea, or to allow animal migration).",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K11","v":"Yes we do have corridors linking the protected area that provides for wildlife passing to key habitats outside the protected area and also we have seen spill over of the marine resources outside the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L11","v":"The management of the corridors linking protected must be effectively monitored and protected from outside disturbances"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation:  \"Planning adresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (e.g. volume, quality and timing of freshwater flow to sustain particular species, fire management to maintain savannah habitats etc.)\"",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K12","v":"We do not have any planning to address ecosystem species needs at the moment."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L12","v":"We may factor that in our future planing"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["22. State and commercial neighbours:Is there co-operation with adjacent land and water users? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K58","v":"The commercial neighbours such as RD Cannery, logging and fishing company have some form  of arrangement to engage the clan leaders of the protected area to represent the protected area community. There is limited coorporation with adjacent government."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L58","v":"The commercial land /sea users and the relevant government bodies should work together for the betterment of the protected area."},null,null,"0: There is no contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users\n1: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users but little or no cooperation\n2: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation \n3: There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["23. Indigenous people: Do indigenous and traditional peoples resident or regularly using the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K62","v":"Our clan leaders are the once representing the protected area community to make relevant decision relating to the management"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L62","v":"We want effective protected area  management committees"},null,null,"0: Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24. Local communities: Do local communities resident or near the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K63","v":"Local communities within the protected area also contributed relevant decision relating to mangement of the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L63","v":"Make Awareness on the access user rights to the communities in the protected area"},null,null,"0: Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Local communities directly contribute to some relevant  decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 a. Impact on communities: There is open communication and trust between local and/or  indigenous people, stakeholders and protected area managers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K70","v":"The community has trust for CEPA in assisting them with the esblishment of their PA."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L70","v":"Continuous dialogue with CEPA to built the trust with protected area communities"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 b. Impact on communities: Programmes to enhance community welfare, while conserving protected area resources, are being implemented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K76","v":"Yes meaning when the protected area area was first established not now."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L76","v":"Continuous awareness on the community welfare programmes"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 c. Impact on communities: Local and/or indigenous people actively support the protected area",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K77","v":"The local community and customary landowners are actively supporting the protected area by creating zones in the protected with limited user rights"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L77","v":"Continuous awareness on the importance of the protected area "},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["25. Economic benefit: Is the protected area providing economic benefits to local communities, e.g. income, employment, payment for environmental services?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K78","v":"There area few sustainable livelihood projects implemented by NGOs that benefit the protected area communities"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L78","v":"Continuous awareness on the livelihood benfits to the protected area"},null,null,"0: The protected area does not deliver any economic benefits to local communities\n1: Potential economic  benefits are recognised and plans to realise these are being developed\n2: There is some flow of economic benefits to local communities \n3: There is a major flow of economic benefits to local communities from activities associated with the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["26. Monitoring and evaluation: Are management activities monitored against performance?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K50","v":"Since the establishment of the WMAs there was no effective management committees to monitor and evaluate the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L50","v":"We need an effective management committees to monitor and evaluate the protected area"},null,null,"0: There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area\n1: There is some ad hoc monitoring and evaluation, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results\n2: There is an agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation system but results do not feed back into management\n3: A good monitoring and evaluation system exists, is well implemented and used in adaptive management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["27. Visitor facilities: Are visitor facilities adequate?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K61","v":"There is none of such facilities in the protected area."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L61","v":"We want such facilities in the protected area in the future"},null,null,"0: There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need\n1: Visitor facilities and services are inappropriate for current levels of visitation \n2: Visitor facilities and services are adequate for current levels of visitation but could be improved\n3: Visitor facilities and services are excellent for current levels of visitation"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["28. Commercial tourism operators: Do commercial tour operators contribute to protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K59","v":"The protected area management committees is not that effective to create that dialogue with the commercial tour operators"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L59","v":"The management committees has to be effective to engage with such commercial operators to benefit the protected area community by providing tour guides to the tourist"},null,null,"0: There is little or no contact between managers and tourism operators using the protected area\n1: There is contact between managers and tourism operators but this is largely confined to administrative or regulatory matters\n2: There is limited co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences and maintain protected area values\n3: There is good co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, and maintain protected area values"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["29. Fees: If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K60","v":"There is no effectiveness of the protected area management committees to apply the fees to the outsiders"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L60","v":"The protected area management committees has to be formed for such fees to be collected to assist with the daily management of the protected area"},null,null,"0: Although fees are theoretically applied, they are not collected\n1: Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its environs\n2: Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its environs\n3: Fees are collected and make a substantial contribution to the protected area and its environs "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["30. What is the overall condition of the biodiversity of the protected area in terms of the indicator(s) indicated in Data Sheet 2 above?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K84","v":"Due to increase population in the protected area and usage of unsustainable fishing methods in the protected area, some natural values have been degraded"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L84","v":"The management plan has to be made effective inorder for the natural values to be protected "},null,null,"0: Severely degraded\n1: Partially degraded\n2: Mostly intact\n3: Completely intact"]
["Comments and Next Steps","Please complete Data Sheet 5 for Question 30 that follows below."]
["Total METT Score (automatically calculated)",{"$f":"SUM(B74:B151)","v":31},null,null,{"$f":"SUM(E74:E151)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(F74:F151)","v":0},"Provide comments here (optional)"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 5: Data sources and methods used to assess the present overall condition of biodiversity in the protected area (METT Question 30, above)."]
["Summarize the data sources used to track the indicator(s) given in Data Sheet 2, and outline the method for assessing the indicator results. The indicator(s) will automatically appear in this table once entered in Data Sheet 2.  \n\nThis table (Data Sheet 5) should be updated, as appropriate, during each application of the METT. An example is provided. "]
["Indicator","Summarize the data sources used to track this indicator",null,null,null,"Outline the method used for assessing the indicator results and what these show about the condition of biodiversity "]
["Example: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year","Records of fire events during the period of monitoring - showing the extent of the area burnt, as recorded by park rangers using hand-held GPS devices to plot boundaries of area and calculate total number of hectares",null,null,null," - Observation of overall trend – more, less or same amount of fire disturbance \n - Reference to scientific literature on ecosystem types to understand optimum fire intervals\n - Examination of fire record to determine historical trends in fires in the PA\n - Analysis of pattern to determine fire frequency in particular parts of PA in and beyond monitoring period"]
[{"$f":"A39","v":"Indicator 1"}]
[{"$f":"A40","v":"Indicator 2"}]
[{"$f":"A41","v":"Indicator 3"}]
[{"$f":"A42","v":"Indicator 4"}]
[{"$f":"A43","v":"Indicator 5"}]