{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":17,"sheets":["About","Dashboard Graphics","Dashboard","Attributes (T1)","Values (P1,1)","Values Checklist (T2)","Key Values (T3)","Benefits (T4)","Negatives (T5)","Threats (T6)","Worst threat (T7)","Scorecard (T8)","Responses","ConditTrend (T9)","Recomm (T10)","Str & Challenges (T11)","GEF METT"],"not_rendered":{"charts":10,"images":9,"macros":1,"external_links":2,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"About","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":9,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[16,1,16,2],[16,3,16,4],[17,1,17,2],[17,3,17,4],[18,1,18,2],[18,3,18,4]]}
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C3","v":"Tarobi LMMA"}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"Country",null,"Papua New Guinea"]
[null,"Protected Area",null,"Tarobi LMMA"]
[null,"Year",null,2021]

{"sheet":"Dashboard Graphics","index":1,"n_rows":179,"n_cols":28,"rows_kept":179,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[93,22,93,23],[93,26,93,27]]}
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B113","v":"METT Category"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C113","v":"% Weighted Score"}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B114","v":"Planning"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C114","v":66.84210526315789}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B115","v":"Input"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C115","v":16.666666666666664}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B116","v":"Process"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C116","v":29.449321628092573}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B117","v":"Output"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C117","v":51.5625}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B118","v":"Outcome"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C118","v":91.666666666666657}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B119","v":"Governance"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C119","v":33.802816901408448}]
[null,null,null,{"$f":"Dashboard!B120","v":"TOTAL"},{"$f":"Dashboard!C120","v":39.894319682959043}]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["All threat categories","Severity"]
["1.1 Housing and settlement ",0]
["1.2 Commercial and industrial areas",0]
["1.3 Tourism and recreation infrastructure (e.g. structures)",0]
["1.4 Population increase in the protected area community",2]
["2.1 Customary landowner and community gardens and small crops",0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"METT score",null,null,null,"Threat severity"]
["2.2 Drug cultivation",0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"1. Low",null,null,null,"1. Low"]
["2.3 Wood and pulp plantations \n",0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"2. Medium",null,null,null,"2. Medium"]
["2.4 Livestock farming and grazing ",0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"3. High",null,null,null,"3. High"]
["2.5 Marine and freshwater aquaculture ",0,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"4. Very high",null,null,null,"4. Very high"]
["2.6 Commercial plantations",0]
["3.1 Oil and gas drilling and pipeline construction",0]
["3.2 Mining and quarrying",0]
["3.3 Energy generation",0]
["4.1 Roads, railroads and paths/tracks ",0]
["4.2 Utility and service lines",0]
["4.3 Shipping lanes and canals",0]
["4.4 Flight paths",0]
["5.1 Hunting, killing and collecting terrestrial (native) animals (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",0]
["5.2 Gathering terrestrial (native) plants or plant products (non-timber) (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)",0]
["5.3a Logging and wood harvesting for local/customary use",2]
["  5.3b Logging and wood harvesting – commercial logging",0]
["  5.4a Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic (includes marine?) resources for local/customary use",3]
["5.4b Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for commercial use",1]
["6.1 Recreational and tourism activities",0]
["6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises ",0]
["6.3 Research, education and other work-related activities in the protected area",0]
["6.4 Activities of the protected area managers (e.g. construction or vehicle use)",0]
["6.5 Deliberate destructive activities or threats to protected area staff and visitors ",0]
["6.6 Impacts from cultural and religious tourism",0]
["7.1 Habitat clearing ",1]
["7.2 Fire and fire suppression",0]
["7.3 Dams, water flow modification and water management/use ",0]
["7.4 Increased fragmentation within the protected area ",0]
["7.5 The protected area is separated from other natural habitat",0]
["7.6 Other ‘edge effects’ (impacts) happening on the boundary of the protected area ",2]
["7.7 Loss of keystone species",0]
["8.1  Introduced (pest) plants",0]
["8.2 Introduced (pest) animals ",0]
["8.3 Diseases such as fungus or viruses that make native plants or animals sick ",0]
["8.4 Introduced genetic material",0]
["9.1 Household sewage and urban/village waste water \n",0]
["9.2 Sewage and waste water from protected area facilities",0]
["9.3 Industrial, mining and military effluents and discharges",0]
["9.4 Agricultural and forestry effluents",2]
["9.5 Garbage and solid waste ",0]
["9.6 Air-borne pollutants",0]
["9.7 Excess energy",0]
["9.8 Sound pollution (especially from roads)",0]
["10.1 Volcanoes (ash and lava)\n",0]
["10.2 Earthquakes/Tsunamis ",1]
["10.3 Avalanches/ Landslides ",1]
["10.4 Erosion and deposition",2]
["11.1 Habitat shifting and alteration ",2]
["11.2 Droughts ",0]
["11.3 Temperature extremes ",0]
["11.4 Storms and flooding",0]
["11.5 Ocean acidification",0]
["11.6 Sea level rise",3]
["11.7 Coral bleaching",1]
["11.8 Saltwater coming into the protected area",0]
["11.9 Other climate changes",2]
["12.1 Loss of cultural links, traditional knowledge, language, dress, sing sings, respect and/or management practices",3]
["12.2 Natural deterioration of important cultural site values ",0]
["12.3 Destruction of cultural heritage buildings, gardens, sites etc ",0]
["12.4 Loss of land tenure",0]
["12.5 Other cultural/social threats",3]
["13.1 Conflicting policies across sectors",0]
["13.2 Confusion about government roles and responsibilities",4]
["13.3 Lack of coordination across all levels of government",4]
[]
[]
["Identified threats","Severity"]
["1.4 Population increase in PA community",2]
["5.3a Logging/wood harvesting for customary use",2]
["  5.4a Fishing, killing & harvesting aquatic resources for customary use",3]
["5.4b Fishing, killing harvesting aquatic resources for commercial use",1]
["7.1 Habitat clearing ",1]
["7.6 Other ‘edge effects’ ",2]
["9.4 Agricultural & forestry effluents",2]
["10.2 Earthquakes/Tsunamis ",1]
["10.3 Avalanches/ Landslides ",1]
["10.4 Erosion & deposition",2]
["11.1 Habitat shifting & alteration ",2]
["11.6 Sea level rise",3,null,null,null,null,null,"1. Low"]
["11.7 Coral bleaching",1,null,null,null,null,null,"2. Medium"]
["11.9 Other climate changes",2,null,null,null,null,null,"3. High"]
["12.1 Loss of cultural links, language etc &/or management practices",3,null,null,null,null,null,"4. Very high"]
["12.5 Other cultural/social threats",3]
["13.2 Confusion about government roles & responsibilities",4]
["13.3 Lack of coordination across all levels of government",4]

{"sheet":"Dashboard","index":2,"n_rows":134,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":134,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Category","Issue","Possible Score","Score","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted Score",null,null,"Categories for reporting",null,"  "]
["Planning","1. Legal status",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J3","v":3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","2. PA objectives ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I4","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J4","v":2},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","3. PA regulations or customary laws/rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F5","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I5","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J5","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G6","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F6","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I6","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J6","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G7","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F7","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I7","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J7","v":0.75},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G8","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F8","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I8","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J8","v":0.75},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J9","v":1},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4a. Land & water planning for habitat conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G10","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I10","v":0.4},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J10","v":0.4},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4b. Land & water planning for connectivity",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G11","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I11","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J11","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G12","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I12","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J12","v":0.3},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","5. PA design",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I13","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J13","v":2},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6a. On ground boundary marking of PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G14","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I14","v":0.89999999999999991},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J14","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6b. Map of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G15","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F15","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I15","v":0.4},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J15","v":0.4},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of PA boundaries",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G16","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F16","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I16","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J16","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the PA ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G17","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F17","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I17","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J17","v":1.5},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G18","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F18","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I18","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J18","v":1.5},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G19","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F19","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I19","v":1.2000000000000002},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J19","v":0.4},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G20","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F20","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I20","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J20","v":0.3},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G21","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F21","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I21","v":0.3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J21","v":0},null,null,"Design & establishment"]
["Planning","7. Management planning",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I22","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J22","v":2},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J23","v":1},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J24","v":1},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G25","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F25","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I25","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J25","v":0.25},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7d. Structures & processes of Management Committee & related PA decision making are clearly documented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G26","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F26","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I26","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J26","v":0.25},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G27","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F27","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I27","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J27","v":0.75},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G28","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F28","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I28","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J28","v":0.25},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I29","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J29","v":0},null,null,"Planning & objectives"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I30","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J30","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I31","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J31","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F32","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I32","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J32","v":1},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I33","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J33","v":2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","12. Current budget",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I34","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J34","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I35","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J35","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G36","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":"not relevant"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I36","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J36","v":" "},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I37","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J37","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I38","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J38","v":0},null,null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment"]
["Process","16. Law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I39","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J39","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G40","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F40","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I40","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J40","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G41","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F41","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I41","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J41","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G42","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F42","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I42","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J42","v":0.5},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G43","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F43","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I43","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J43","v":0.25},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G44","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F44","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I44","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J44","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G45","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F45","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I45","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J45","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I46","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J46","v":1},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G47","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F47","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I47","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J47","v":0},null,null,"Legislation, control & enforcement"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F48","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I48","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J48","v":2},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Process","19. Research ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F49","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I49","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J49","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","20. Monitoring & evaluation (of management activities)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I50","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J50","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","21. Resource management ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I51","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J51","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","22. Climate change ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F52","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I52","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J52","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G53","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F53","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I53","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J53","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G54","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F54","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I54","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J54","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F55","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I55","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J55","v":0.5},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G56","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F56","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I56","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J56","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","25. Education & awareness ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I57","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J57","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","26. Government & commercial neighbour cooperation",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I58","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J58","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I59","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J59","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","28. Fees",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I60","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J60","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I61","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J61","v":0},null,null,"Tourism & recreation"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I62","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J62","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Process","31. Local communities & others with access or user ‘rights’",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I63","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J63","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to PA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G64","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F64","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I64","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J64","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G65","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F65","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I65","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J65","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G66","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F66","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I66","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J66","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of PA decisions",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G67","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F67","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I67","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J67","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G68","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F68","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I68","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J68","v":0.25},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in full range of PA decisions ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G69","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F69","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I69","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J69","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G70","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I70","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J70","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Provincial govt",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G71","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F71","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I71","v":0.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J71","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & LLG",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G72","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F72","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I72","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J72","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & District reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G73","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F73","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I73","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J73","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & Ward reps",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F74","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I74","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J74","v":0.25},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31g. Communication & trust between customary landowners & NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G75","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F75","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I75","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J75","v":0},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J76","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","31i. Level of support",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J77","v":1},null,null,"Relationships, education & awareness"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I78","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J78","v":2},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G79","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F79","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I79","v":1.5},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J79","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G80","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F80","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I80","v":0.75},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J80","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G81","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F81","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I81","v":0.25},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J81","v":0},null,null,"Economic benefit"]
["Output","33. Threats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F82","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I82","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J82","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I83","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J83","v":3},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I84","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J84","v":2},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I85","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J85","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I86","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J86","v":1},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F87","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I87","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J87","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I88","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J88","v":3},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I89","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J89","v":1},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F90","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I90","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J90","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F91","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I91","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J91","v":0},null,null,"Resource management"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I92","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J92","v":3},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I93","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J93","v":3},null,null,"Condition of values"]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G94","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F94","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I94","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J94","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G95","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F95","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I95","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J95","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G96","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F96","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I96","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J96","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G97","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F97","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I97","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J97","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!G98","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F98","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!I98","v":0.60000000000000009},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!J98","v":0},null,null,"Human resources"]
["TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(C2:C97)","v":219},{"$f":"SUM(D2:D97)","v":85},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E97)","v":151.39999999999998},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F97)","v":60.400000000000006}]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","Score","Possible Score","% Non-weighted score","Weighted Score","Possible Weighted Score","%"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"SUM(D2:D3,D8:D12,D21:D23,D28)","v":14},{"$f":"SUM(C2:C3,C8:C12,C21:C23,C28)","v":21},{"$f":"C103/D103*100","v":66.666666666666657},{"$f":"SUM(F2:F3,F8:F12,F21:F23,F28)","v":12.7},{"$f":"SUM(E2:E3,E8:E12,E21:E23,E28)","v":19},{"$f":"F103/G103*100","v":66.84210526315789}]
[null,"Input",{"$f":"SUM(D29:D34,D36,D93:D97)","v":4},{"$f":"SUM(C29:C34,C36,C93:C97)","v":36},11.111111111111111,{"$f":"SUM(F29:F34,F36,F93:F97)","v":4},{"$f":"SUM(E29:E34,E36,E93:E97)","v":24.000000000000007},16.666666666666664]
[null,"Process",{"$f":"SUM(D4,D13:D20,D24,D35,D37:D38,D45,D47:D59,D61:D62,D84:D86,D88:D90)","v":27},{"$f":"SUM(C4,C13:C20,C24,C35,C37:C38,C45,C47:C59,C61:C62,C84:C86,C88:C90)","v":78},34.615384615384613,{"$f":"SUM(F4,F13:F20,F24,F37:F38,F35,F45,F47:F59,F61:F62,F84:F86,F88:F90)","v":18.45},{"$f":"SUM(E4,E13:E20,E24,E35,E37:E38,E45,E47:E59,E61:E62,E84:E86,E88:E90)","v":62.650000000000006},29.449321628092573]
[null,"Output",{"$f":"SUM(D60,D69:D77,D81:D82)","v":9},{"$f":"SUM(C69:C77,C81:C82,C60)","v":20},45,{"$f":"SUM(F81:F82,F69:F77,F60)","v":8.25},{"$f":"SUM(E60,E69:E77,E81:E82)","v":16},51.5625]
[null,"Outcome",{"$f":"SUM(D83,D87,D91:D92)","v":11},{"$f":"SUM(C83,C87,C91:C92)","v":12},91.666666666666657,{"$f":"SUM(F91:F92,F87,F83)","v":11},{"$f":"SUM(E91:E92,E87,E83)","v":12},91.666666666666657]
[null,"Governance",{"$f":"SUM(D5:D7,D25:D27,D39:D44,D46,D63:D68,D78:D80)","v":20},{"$f":"SUM(C5:C7,C25:C27,C39:C44,C46,C63:C68,C78:C80)","v":52},38.461538461538467,{"$f":"SUM(F5:F7,F25:F27,F39:F44,F46,F63:F68,F78:F80)","v":6},{"$f":"SUM(E78:E80,E63:E68,E46,E39:E44,E25:E27,E5:E7)","v":17.75},33.802816901408448]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C103:C108)","v":85},{"$f":"SUM(D103:D108)","v":219},38.81278538812785,{"$f":"SUM(F103:F108)","v":60.4},{"$f":"SUM(G103:G108)","v":151.4},39.894319682959043]
[]
[]
[]
[null,"METT Category","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Planning",{"$f":"H103","v":66.84210526315789}]
[null,"Input",16.666666666666664]
[null,"Process",29.449321628092573]
[null,"Output",51.5625]
[null,"Outcome",91.666666666666657]
[null,"Governance",33.802816901408448]
[null,"TOTAL",39.894319682959043]
[]
[]
[null,"Themes","Weighted Score","Possible W'ed Score","% Weighted Score"]
[null,"Design & establishment",{"$f":"SUM(F2,F12:F20)","v":9.7000000000000011},{"$f":"SUM(E2,E12:E20)","v":12.400000000000002},{"$f":"C124/D124*100","v":78.225806451612897}]
[null,"Planning & objectives",{"$f":"SUM(F3,F8:F11,F21:F28)","v":9.1999999999999993},{"$f":"SUM(E3,E8:E11,E21:E28)","v":14.5},{"$f":"C125/D125*100","v":63.448275862068961}]
[null,"Legislation, control & enforcement",{"$f":"SUM(F4:F7,F38:F46)","v":6.25},{"$f":"SUM(E4:E7,E38:E46)","v":20},31.25]
[null,"Resource management",{"$f":"SUM(F29,F48:F55,F81:F82,F85:F86,F89:F90)","v":9.5},{"$f":"SUM(E29,E48:E55,E81:E82,E85:E86,E89:E90)","v":30},31.666666666666664]
[null,"Human resources",{"$f":"SUM(F30:F32,F47,F63:F68,F93:F97)","v":5.5},{"$f":"SUM(E93:E97,E63:E68,E47,E30:E32)","v":18},30.555555555555557]
[null,"Budget, infrastructure & equipment",{"$f":"SUM(F33:F37)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E33:E37)","v":12},0]
[null,"Relationships, education & awareness",{"$f":"SUM(F56:F57,F61:F62,F69:F76)","v":5.25},{"$f":"SUM(E56:E57,E61:E62,E69:E76)","v":16},32.8125]
[null,"Tourism & recreation",{"$f":"SUM(F58:F60)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(E58:E60)","v":9},0]
[null,"Economic benefit",{"$f":"SUM(F77:F80)","v":2},{"$f":"SUM(E77:E80)","v":5.5},36.363636363636367]
[null,"Condition of values",{"$f":"SUM(F83:F84,F87:F88,F91:F92)","v":13},{"$f":"SUM(E83:E84,E87:E88,E91:E92)","v":14},92.857142857142861]
[null,"TOTAL",{"$f":"SUM(C124:C133)","v":60.4},{"$f":"SUM(D124:D133)","v":151.4},39.894319682959043]

{"sheet":"Attributes (T1)","index":3,"n_rows":75,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":75,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,3]]}
["Protected area attributes (Table 1)"]
[null,"Question","Your answer"]
[null,null,"Tarobi LMMA"]
[1,"Country","Papua New Guinea"]
[2,"Location of protected area","The LMMA is located in the Central Nakanai LLG Area in Kimbe Bay. The area is accessed by road from Kimbe and by boat to the LMMA. Tarobi village is situated adjacent to the coastline and is isolated from the main highway, which is about 25km to the south. The existing unsealed road to the community is seasonal, often being impassable during the wet season. There are three villages/hamlets, (Valako, Kololo and Kavutu). The LMMA  is made up of the Eastern and Western Tarobi Bays and includes two islands and four reefs, two mangrove sites, one masalai site and one beach."]
["2a","Province(s)","West New Britain"]
["2b","District/s","Talasea"]
["2c","Local level government(s)","Central Nakanai (Was formerly under Bialla Rural LLG until recently)"]
["2d","Wards (Name and/or number)",8]
[3,"Name of the protected area","Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"]
["3a","CEPA Protected Area site code","TARO (Marine Division)"]
[4,"World Database of Protected Areas site code","NA"]
[5,"Date when the protected area was formally established (dd/mm/yyyy)","2007-12-11"]
["5a","Gazettal information or designation information (what does the date above refer to?)","This is the date when the agreement to formally recognise the LMMA was done between Bialla RLLG and Tarobi village. Since moving to Central Nakanai, this component is yet to be formalised as Central Nakanai is yet to have such Environment Law"]
[6,"What is the size of the protected area (in km2)?",197.5]
[7,"Protected area designation(s): What level or kind of protected area is it? ","Locally Managed Marine Area"]
[8,"IUCN Protected area category ","No"]
[9,"IUCN Protected area category (other) ","No"]
[10,"International designations. Is the site listed under an international designation e.g. World Heritage site or Ramsar site, or WWF Global 2000 etc? (Y/N)","No"]
["10a","World Heritage site (Y/N)","No"]
["10b","Ramsar site (Y/N)","No"]
["10c","UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves (Y/N)","No"]
[11,"Other designations. Is the site listed under any other designation? (Y/N) ","No"]
[12,"Has the site been identified as a site of particular importance for biodiversity? (Y/N)","No"]
[13,"Who owns the protected area?","Customary Landowners"]
["13a","If the protected area is owned by customary landowners, please indicate all the relevant Clans.","Customary landowners are made up of 10 clans - 6 major clans (Ugeuge, Kabulbulu, Bualali, Ailili, Gararua & Ababe) and 4 minor clans (Mamapa, Rosarosa, Ilaolao & Mararea)"]
["13b","How many households live within the protected area? (e.g. 15)",0]
["13c","How many people live within the protected area? (e.g. 367)",0]
["13d","What proportion of the population living within the protected area comprises children (under 18 years old)?",0]
["13e","Briefly outline what surrounds the protected area","Villages, Land Settlement Scheme Blocks (LSS), Estates (Small holder blocks and mini estates) and the sea/ocean. There is also the East and West Tarobi Bays"]
[14,"Who manages the protected area? ","The LMMA is managed by the Tarobi LMMA Management Committee (TLMMAMC). However, it has not been functional (new members have recently been selected). In its absence, the community looks after the LMMA based on their level of understanding of the LMMA (rules, zones etc.) and also on the marine tenureship (matrilineal) of the LMMA. The ten clans (who own or have rights) are very much involved in helping to manage the LMMA. They contribute to decisions by consent at clan level that are taken up to the TLMMAMC. (Tarobi recently became part of the Central Nakanai LLG there its recognition under the Bialla Rural LLG needs to be transferred or worked on)"]
[15,"Are there any special areas where restrictions or rules are in place that limit the activities that can take place in that area?","Yes, No Take Zone, No Go Zone (Preservation Zones), Conservation Zone, Habitat Protection Zone and specific sites - Spawning aggregation and Sea Turtle nesting sites. (See map attached)"]
[16,"Briefly describe the cultural system, family, traditions, pasin tumbuna and the way in which customary landowners care for (lukautim) the land/sea in the protected area (i.e. if the protected area is owned by customary landowners).","The marine tenure system here is predominantly matrilineal and includes territorial and resource (fish, shellfish, seaweed and other marine resources) rights over reefs and seas which are controlled communally at the clan level. Access is through the mother’s lineage so that a man has primary rights over his mother’s property, and these rights pass to his sisters’ children on his death (rights vested in his eldest sister’s eldest daughter). Put another way, the eldest daughter inherits the resource tenure rights of her mother, but her brother is the primary person who speaks on her behalf on land and other resource matters. There are also traditions like 'Merarobo' which is a tabu/stop to do fishing, collecting shells etc at a certain reef or site to honour the death of a community member. These Merarobo can be in place from 1-3 years and its opened for access after traditional feast ceremonies. This helps the conservation area but is done using the marine tenureship but is observed by all clans."]
[17,"What rights do ‘other’ people have in relation to the protected area? (i.e. those who are not customary landowners)","Everyone including settlers are guided by the Permitted and not Permitted access rule for each site in the PA. These arrangements are captured in the Management Plan which also sets out fines for breaking the laws. Fines vary differently for the same offence by customary land owners, outside communities with customary rights and outsiders with no customary rights."]
[18,"What is the process for deciding how land/sea in the protected area is accessed and used?","The PA developed different zonings with permitted activities and not permitted activities in the Management Plan."]
[19,"Total number of staff. Does the protected area have staff (paid workers)? (Y/N)",0]
["19a","Number of Permanent paid workers and their positions (e.g. 5 rangers, 1 manager)",0]
["19b","Number of Temporary paid workers and their positions (e.g. 4 caretakers, 5 rangers)",0]
["19c","How many people do work in the protected area on a voluntary basis (not paid)? ",2]
["19d","What type of work do these voluntary workers/customary landowners undertake?","Monitoring and service work in the PA"]
[20,"What is the annual budget (Kina/ USD) for recurrent (operational) funds (excluding staff salary costs)?",0]
["20a","Year for which the budget is reported","NA"]
["20b","Recurrent (operational) funds",0]
["20c","Project or other supplementary or special funds (excluding staff salary costs)",0]
[21,"How many visitors came to the protected area last calendar year? ",0]
["21a","In what year were these visitor numbers reported? (yyyy)","NA"]
["21b","Describe the main reasons for the tourist visits","NA"]
[22,"Main value 1 ",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Mangroves (systems)"}]
[null,"Main value 2",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B5","v":"Sea grass (system)"}]
[null,"Main value 3",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B6","v":"Coral systems (corals and reefs)"}]
[null,"Main value 4",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B7","v":"Turtle nesting"}]
[null,"Main value 5",{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B8","v":"Cultural sites"}]
[23,"What are the benefits that arise from having the protected area?","1. People able to catch fish much more easier/quicker as stocks has returned to normalcy 2. Helps control rise in sea level and other climate change impacts, 3. Return of the culturally recognised dugong, 4. Increase in Kina shells  for household consumption, market (cash) and for lime, 5. More sea cucumbers available for harvest during season openings to make a little more money"]
[24,"Management objective 1","To use our marine resources in a more sustainable way with consideration for our future generation "]
[null,"Management objective 2                                     ","To protect our culture and traditions that connect us to the marine environment"]
[null,"Management objective 3","To develop our community through the sustainable use of our LMMA and eco-tourism (NOTE: there are 7 specific management objectives related to 7 targets (values) identified in our management plan."]
[25,"Are there any negative impacts or burdens on the wellbeing of customary landowners and others with user/access rights to the protected area that result from the protected area? If so, list them briefly here","A) Reduced and limited accessibility of resources by local owners; B) Disputes/conflicts arising amongst locals (clans and families)"]
[26,"Total number of people involved in completing or answering the questions in this assessment",7]
["26a","Protected area manager (this includes the management committee members)","Jeffery Laia, Vice Chairman, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG, 72121089; Dianna Vareo, Treasurer, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG; Julie Roger, Women's Rep, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG, 72822704; Joe Pakailu, Secretary, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG, 70674265; John Bubu, Monitoring and Surveillance, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG; Cletus Reky, Monitoring and Surveillance, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG; Mathilda Ilevi, Monitoring and Surveillance, Tarobi Village, Central Nakanai LLG. (NOTE: none of the participants had an email address apart from mobile contacts)"]
["26b","Protected area staff (paid workers)"]
["26c","Other Protected Area authority staff"]
["26d","Volunteer"]
["26e","NGO"]
["26f","Customary landowners, including the local community members and clan leaders"]
["26g","Donors and/or sponsors"]
["26h","External consultants"]
["26i","Others "]
[27,"Please note if the assessment was conducted in association with a particular project, on behalf of an organisation or donor.","GEF/UNDP cycle 6 "]
["28a","The Facilitator Name and position","Elton Kaitokai, Senior Program Officer, Terrestrial Ecosystems Management"]
["28b","Facilitator - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
["28c","Facilitator - Address, Email, Phone","P.O 6601, Boroko, National Capital District,                                        ekaitokai@gmail.com , 3014500, 7550 8539"]
[29,"Recorder- Name and position","Martha Wamo, PNG Marine Program CTI-CFF Secretariat Officer"]
[null,"Recorder - Organisation","Conservation and Environment Protection Authority"]
[null,"Recorder - Address, Email, Phone","P.O Box 6601, Boroko, National Capital District                                                mrthwm47@gmail.com, 301 4534, 7549 8043                                                       "]
[30,"Date the assessment carried out (e.g. 29/01/2019)","19-20/07/2021"]

{"sheet":"Values (P1,1)","index":4,"n_rows":4,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":4,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1]]}
["Protected area description - \"What I like about the protected area\""]
["PA Name","Description of values"]
[null,"Insert text - this should include the words spoken by the PA representative(s) when they describe what they like about their PA"]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"},"Tarobi LMMA is rich in marine resources. We have too many and invite all to come an see! Our marine resources are still intact. Our mangroves have over grown into mangrove forest. The sea grass area has extended. We have turtle nesting sites, fish spawning sites, a coral network including the 'K1 crater reef', and we are the only place with two varieties of anemones, one from the coral reef and one in the sea-grass because we don't eat them like people do in other sites. Our area is away from the main road and being remote, not many people access the area to remove and destroy our marine resources."]

{"sheet":"Values Checklist (T2)","index":5,"n_rows":29,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":29,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,6]]}
["Checklist of protected area values and benefits (Table 2)"]
["Q. No.","(Summary Question)","Question: Does the protected area:","Answer (click on arrow)","Score","Total score possible","Comment (to help explain the score)"]
[1,"Biodiversity","Provide for biodiversity (i.e. have many different kinds of plants, animals and ecosystems)?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D3,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"There are a diverse range of marine species found in the LMMA, including dugong, fish and turtles. There is also mangroves, seagrass and estuaries and island ecosystems."]
[2,"Special plants & animals","Have species of plants and animals listed as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Leatherback turtle, giant clam shells, dugongs and beche-de-mer."]
[3,"Locally endemic plants or animal spp","Have species of plants or animals found only in the protected area or nearby locations?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"Two types of anemones, one in coral reef and one in the seagrass, home of clown fish and sandy bass."]
[4,"Important ecosystems","Contain important ecosystems (e.g. wetlands, grasslands, coral reefs etc)? ","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"The LMMA has coastal ecosystems, mangrove ecosystems, reefs, islands and a few more. There is also a terrestrial wetland/marshland within site."]
[5,"Protect clean, fresh water","Protect clean, fresh water?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"The wetlands and estuaries contribute to the cleaning of water"]
[6,"Religious or spiritual significance","Have religious or spiritual significance (e.g. tambu places, sacred sites)?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Mainly spiritual (masalai and tambu) areas which can be temporary or permanent. The permanent sites are mainly reefs, parts of the mangrove and ends of the islands. The temporary ones are mainly for traditional uses and when there is death."]
[7,"Scientific value","Have scientific value?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"\"One Kina Reef\" is an extent/dormant volcanic crater Many significant sites relate to this. The main reef types are inshore and barrier reefs, which include corals, fish species and turtles. Mainly based on the biodiversity values of the LMMA (scientific design of the LMMA)"]
[8,"Source of employment for local communities","Provide a source of employment for local communities?","None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},2,"No paid work. Current work is on voluntary basis without pay."]
[9,"Resources for local subsistence","Provide resources for local subsistence (e.g. food, building materials, medicines etc)?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"This a major reason for the LMMA to keep providing local needs like protein, materials for houses, and goods that can be sold to earn some cash. It also provides cultural connections that maintains local relationships to their marine tenureship (matrilineal)."]
[10,"Resources for sale & benefits aid community d'ment & well-being","Provide resources for sale, with the benefits used to enable community development and enhance well-being?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Commercial products include beche-de-mer and trochus and on a family scale include fish like rabbit fish, reef fish, mullet, sea shells, kina shells, kina shell lime, shell money from the mangroves. So the LMMA resources provide for food security and there is medicinal use of sea grass (helps asthma). "]
[11,"Foster & attract community d'ment projects to enhance community well-being","Foster and attract community development projects to enhance community well-being?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Families try to attract community development. However, selfishness and greed by certain individuals most times affect others."]
[12,"Place where culture, language & traditions are practiced","Provide a place where culture, language and traditional practices can be practiced?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Still normal. Passing of local knowledge on season, patterns, catch in the absences of modern tech and gear. Also locals reflect in their languages of names of marine resources and those that are associated to their clan stories like dugongs, giant clams and reef areas."]
[13,"People who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations","Have people who pass on traditional knowledge to future generations?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"Not many are still alive and the younger people now do not show much interest in learning from the elders"]
[14,"Plant species of high cultural or economic importance","Have plant species of high cultural or economic importance?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"Mangroves and seaweeds that help pregnant mothers and seaweed for diabetes "]
[15,"Animal species of high cultural or economic importance","Have animal species of high cultural or economic importance?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"Economic importance include beche-de-mer, trochus shell, fish (e.g. black bass, grouper, marlin and mullet) and culturally dugongs, giant clam and those that are associated with their clans (taboo to eat, kill or chase such)."]
[16,"Historical sites","Have historical sites?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"The K1 reef is intact and is not accessed. There are also clan stories associated with areas in the LMMA and nearby."]
[17,"Nice scenery","Have nice scenery (naispela hap long lukim)?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"There are five islands and the scenic marshland provides beautiful scenic views. The coral reefs also provide scenic views for diving and snorkelling."]
[18,"Tourism activities now","Have any tourism activities now?","None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":0},2,"None at the moment"]
[19,"Potential for tourism activities in the future","Have the potential for tourism activities in the future?","A lot",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":2},2,"There is potential for nature based and ecotourism activities in the LMMA. Dive tourism has high potential and could be explored given reports of Walindi entering their area without formal arrangements. This could be explored to be formalised as a start."]
[20,"Role in providing educational opportunities","Have a role in providing educational opportunities?","Some",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!$K$1:$L$5,2,FALSE)","v":1},2,"Continue awareness and educational involvement of the stakeholders ( Yes at the start of the formation of LMMA, however not so much now). School programs use the LMMA. JCU also did coral reef ecology which has potential for long term partnership if supported."]
[null,"TOTAL","TOTAL",null,{"$f":"SUM(E3:E22)","v":30},{"$f":"SUM(F3:F22)","v":40}]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,"Legend"]
[null,null,null,0,"None"]
[null,null,null,1,"Some"]
[null,null,null,2,"A lot"]

{"sheet":"Key Values (T3)","index":6,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area values (Table 3)"]
["No.","Key values ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. only known breeding area for the PNG Heron)","(e.g. large freshwater wetland areas immediately above high tide provide nesting sites and food for rearing chicks. Island location means no interference from feral animals or from vehicles)."]
[1,"Mangroves (systems)","Fish and other marine resources, if destroyed it can deplete resources. It also acts as a natural barrier from sea level rising, and used for post/ \"maternity ward\" for marine resources"]
[2,"Sea grass (system)","Fish feeding site, There are nine species identified. Dugongs also come to grace here."]
[3,"Coral systems (corals and reefs)","It provides a dwelling place for a high variety of marine line life. We have almost the highest percent of reef systems in our LMMA from near shore to barrier reef that host a lot of marine life."]
[4,"Turtle nesting","Customary value, food source and also monetary value for income. Also for tourism value"]
[5,"Cultural sites","Sacred sites are restricted from access to preserve cultural beliefs and can only be accessed for cultural ceremonial purposes, e.g. fishing sites for grouper and black brass"]

{"sheet":"Benefits (T4)","index":7,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area benefits (Table 4)"]
["No.","Benefit/Positive","Brief description "]
[]
[1,"People able to catch fish  much more easier (quicker) now as population has increased, there is spill over etc.","LMMA zones for fishing activities and banning of destructive fishing methods e.g., poison roots. As a result, fish stocks have returned to normal and the coral reef has rehabilitated and created spill-over effect so we can still fish outside the LMMA or in general use zones (in our areas)."]
[2,"Helps control rise in sea level rise and other climate change impacts.","Rehabilitation of mangroves forest has reduced the impact of the rising sea level, also saw increase in seagrass area and increase in marine resources in the mangrove e.g., crabs, shells."]
[3,"Return of the culturally recognised dugong","Dugong are a source of protein and are associated with many cultural stories in Tarobi. Due to over hunting for its meat, the sightings of dugong had decreased. Since the total ban by NFA on harvesting no one is harvesting. Locals also have pledged to stop hunting dugongs. With the LMMA, they have been seeing a return of the dugong. There is a lot of seagrass for the dugong to feed on and people have stopped hunting them."]
[4,"Increase in Kina shells (Makiri) for household consumption, market (cash) and for lime","The meat is collected both for consumption and for sale at informal markets, while the shell is processed into lime (eaten with betel nut) for home consumption and sale at informal markets. Although widely available, there was a decline however the LMMA has restored this through the care of the mangrove systems."]
[5,"There are more sea cucumbers available for harvest during season openings and this enables the community to make a little more money","Stock and size increased."]

{"sheet":"Negatives (T5)","index":8,"n_rows":5,"n_cols":3,"rows_kept":5,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2],[1,0,2,0]]}
["Protected area negative impacts (Table 5)"]
["No.","Negative impact ","Brief description "]
[null,"(e.g. restrictions on fishing)","(explain why this is a negative)"]
[1,"Reduced and limited accessibility of resources by local owners","Local people with user and access rights now have to abide by the rules of the LMMA. The frequency and freedom to use and harvest in the area is limited now and at times monitored."]
[2,"Disputes/conflicts arising amongst locals (clans and families)","Families/clans having disagreements on use and access rights to zones and sites as a result of restrictions place on them throughout he LMMA. Also resulting in illegal takes."]

{"sheet":"Threats (T6)","index":9,"n_rows":72,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":72,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[69,0,71,0],[0,0,0,9],[32,0,38,0],[39,0,42,0],[43,0,50,0],[51,0,54,0],[55,0,63,0],[64,0,68,0],[3,0,6,0],[7,0,12,0],[13,0,15,0],[16,0,19,0],[20,0,25,0],[26,0,31,0]]}
["Detailed assessment of threats (Table 6)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Meaning of ratings"]
["Threat category\n","Threat ","Description ","Threat extent ","Threat extent score","Threat severity ","Threat severity score","Management response now","Future management response ","Notes including values affected"]
[null,"Sub-categories of threat","If the threat is present, insert details of the threat in the PA","Select from pull down menu","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","Select from pull down menu (leave blank if not applicable)","Insert score: VH=4; H=3; M=2; L=1","List the management responses that are occurring NOW","List what management needs to do to address the threat","Write additional information here",null,"Extent rating","Meaning: the threat is…."]
["1: Housing and commercial development within a protected area\nThreats from human settlements or other non-agricultural land uses","1.1 Housing and settlement ","N/A","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F4,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Very high (4)","widespread and affects the value throughout the PA "]
[null,"1.2 Commercial and industrial areas","N/A","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F5,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"High (3)","widespread and affects the value at many locations "]
[null,"1.3 Tourism and recreation infrastructure (e.g. structures)","N/A","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F6,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Medium (2)","localised and affects the value at some locations"]
[null,"1.4 Population increase in the protected area community","Yes, causing high demand for food and income to sustain livelihood","Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F7,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Community awareness, Family planning methods to control population increase","Need to revisit the Management plan and revive rules and existing community respect","Community Opinion, Planning documents and Research and monitoring",null,"Low (1)","localised and found in only limited locations and the impact on our values is limited"]
["2: Agriculture and aquaculture within a protected area\nThreats to the protected area from all kinds of farming and grazing including plantations, forestry and fishing","2.1 Customary landowner and community gardens and small crops","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F8,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"None (0)","threat is not present"]
[null,"2.2 Drug cultivation","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F9,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Severity rating","Meaning: the threat is …."]
[null,"2.3 Wood and pulp plantations \n","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F10,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Very high (4)","likely to destroy some protected area value(s) (e.g. it might destroy a type of animal or plant, or your traditional gardens)"]
[null,"2.4 Livestock farming and grazing ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F11,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"High (3)","likely to seriously degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs "]
[null,"2.5 Marine and freshwater aquaculture ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F12,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Medium (2)","likely to moderately degrade the protected area values where the threat occurs – they are damaging values but not so badly "]
[null,"2.6 Commercial plantations","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F13,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,null,null,"Low (1)","only slightly impacting on protected areas values "]
["3. Energy production and mining within a protected area\nThreats from production of non-biological resources ","3.1 Oil and gas drilling and pipeline construction","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F14,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"3.2 Mining and quarrying","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D15,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F15,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"3.3 Energy generation","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D16,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F16,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["4. Transportation and service corridors\nThreats from long narrow transport corridors and the vehicles (and people) that use some of them","4.1 Roads, railroads and paths/tracks ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F17,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"4.2 Utility and service lines","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F18,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"4.3 Shipping lanes and canals","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F19,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"4.4 Flight paths","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F20,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["5. Biological resource use and harm within a protected area\nThreats from the use of \"wild\" biological resources including both deliberate and unintentional harvesting effects (Note this includes hunting and killing of animals). ","5.1 Hunting, killing and collecting terrestrial (native) animals (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F21,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"5.2 Gathering terrestrial (native) plants or plant products (non-timber) (including for ceremonial purposes and commercial use)","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F22,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"5.3a Logging and wood harvesting for local/customary use","Yes, mainly in the mangrove forests","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F23,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Expanding populations place pressure on extraction of timber for building materials and fire wood. Current awareness only","Require persistent education and awareness on the younger population"]
[null,"  5.3b Logging and wood harvesting – commercial logging","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F24,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"  5.4a Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic (includes marine?) resources for local/customary use","Yes, due to lack of awareness of conservation measures and during 'kastom wok'. Also knowingly causing destruction by people who are aware of the protection etc, causing harm to Mangroves and seagrass, coral reef network. Occasional event during customary harvest, values affected are Mangroves, Seagrass and Coral network. People from all age groups are involved in this. ","High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F25,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3}," Current management includes: 1.Awareness raising in the communities, 2.monitoring on outrigger canoes, 3.penalising offenders using management rules (not good outcomes)"," Seek assistance to train and equip and use of drones/modern equipment to do monitoring ","Research and Monitoring, Community opinion, customary landowner knowledge;                                                            Occasional event during customary harvest, values affected will be Mangroves, Seagrass and Coral network. Seek assistance from CEPA, UNDP to improve monitoring in future","Some the marine resources harvested for household use apart from fish include seaweed\nsquid/octopus, Crab (Saltwater), Crab (Mangrove), prawns, lobster, turtle, crocodile, Bislama, Trochus Shell, dugong"]
[null,"5.4b Fishing, killing and harvesting (native) aquatic resources for commercial use","There are only a few trade stores in Bialla and one at Mamota  which occasionally purchase fish locally. At time also locals try to sell to the main fish buyer at Kimbe, KBSA. This is done by less than 5% of Household. ","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F26,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Retail fish sales were insignificant across the LMMA community however its importance is quite significant. An agreement was made in 2003 between Tarobi landowners and an expatriate businessman to establish a supermarket (Hamamas Trading) on Tarobi customary land bordering the Kimbe-Bialla road. Part of their agreement with Hamamas Trading was for the latter to provide transport from the village to a newly created market outside the Hamamas Trading supermarket for market vendors. During 2004 until mid 2005, Hamamas Trading provided free transport every Tuesday and Saturday from the village to the Hamamas market for women to sell fish, shellfish, other marine products and betel nut. Tarobi villagers also sold fish to the storeowner. As a remote village with strong fishing culture, many locals tended to be more dependent for income on fish sales at local markets and sold a wider range of species than more accessible villages. The number of fish species sold at local markets ranged from ten to four species. ","Incorporate the monitoring of frequently sold fish species into a workplan in the new management plan. (According to TNC, the main fish species sold include Barracuda, Paddletail, Red Emperor, Spanish Mackerel, Sweetlip, Trevally, Tuna)"]
["6. Human intrusions and disturbance within a protected area\nThreats from human activities that alter, destroy or disturb habitats and species associated with non-consumptive uses of biological resources","6.1 Recreational and tourism activities","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D27,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F27,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,null,"Research and Monitoring Community opinion, customary landowner knowledge,,,occasional event during customary harvest, values affected will be Mangroves, Seagrass and Coral network. Need to help from CEPA, UNDP to improve monitoring in future. Everyone including children do harvesting"]
[null,"6.2 War, civil unrest and military exercises ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F28,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.3 Research, education and other work-related activities in the protected area","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D29,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F29,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.4 Activities of the protected area managers (e.g. construction or vehicle use)","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D30,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F30,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.5 Deliberate destructive activities or threats to protected area staff and visitors ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D31,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F31,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"6.6 Impacts from cultural and religious tourism","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D32,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F32,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["7. Changes to natural systems \nThreats from other actions that convert or degrade habitat or change the way the ecosystem functions.","7.1 Habitat clearing ","Yes, affects mangroves, turtle nesting sites and cultural sites for housing purposes by both customary land owners and neighbouring clans.","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D33,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F33,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"1. Awareness to communities, 2. monitoring on outrigger canoes, 3. penalising offenders using management rules (not very effective)","More education and awareness to local communities including the surrounding settlements and villages","Community opinion, Customary Landowner knowledge and Research and monitoring"]
[null,"7.2 Fire and fire suppression","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D34,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F34,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.3 Dams, water flow modification and water management/use ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D35,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F35,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.4 Increased fragmentation within the protected area ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D36,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F36,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.5 The protected area is separated from other natural habitat","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D37,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F37,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"7.6 Other ‘edge effects’ (impacts) happening on the boundary of the protected area ","Yes, expansion of oil palm and logging impacting on the estuaries, and mudflats hardening (shells and other breeding and grass areas like seagrass affected).","Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D38,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F38,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"No current actions","Need to establish working relationships with the industry to consider and support the LMMA","Community Opinion, Customary Landowner knowledge"]
[null,"7.7 Loss of keystone species","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D39,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F39,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["8. Invasive and other problematic species and genes. Threats from terrestrial and aquatic non-native and native plants, animals, pathogens/microbes or genetic materials that have, or are predicted to have, harmful effects on biodiversity following introduction, spread and/or increase","8.1  Introduced (pest) plants","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D40,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F40,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"8.2 Introduced (pest) animals ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D41,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F41,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"8.3 Diseases such as fungus or viruses that make native plants or animals sick ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D42,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F42,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"8.4 Introduced genetic material","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D43,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F43,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["9. Pollution entering or generated  \nThreats from pollution and/or excess materials or energy from specific sites or more general sources ","9.1 Household sewage and urban/village waste water \n","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D44,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F44,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.2 Sewage and waste water from protected area facilities","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F45,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.3 Industrial, mining and military effluents and discharges","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D46,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F46,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.4 Agricultural and forestry effluents","Yes,-Logging and oil palm development causing increased sedimentation, resulting in harder surface within the sandy flats habitats","Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D47,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F47,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Currently nothing is being done","Write to the Logging company and Hargy to discuss this matter for  inclusion as part of their environment monitoring plan (copy to CEPA and Provincial Government.","Staff experience; community opinion"]
[null,"9.5 Garbage and solid waste ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D48,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F48,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.6 Air-borne pollutants","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D49,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F49,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.7 Excess energy","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D50,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F50,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"9.8 Sound pollution (especially from roads)","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D51,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F51,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
["10. Geological events \nGeological events may be part of natural disturbance regimes in many ecosystems. However, they can be a threat if a species or habitat is damaged and has lost its resilience and is vulnerable to disturbance. Management capacity to respond to some of these changes may be limited.","10.1 Volcanoes (ash and lava)\n","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D52,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F52,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"10.2 Earthquakes/Tsunamis ","Yes, Coral network and sea grass","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D53,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F53,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Close communication and contact with Office Disaster and Management","Maintain Close communication and contact with Office Disaster and Management","Community opinion, External Expert opinion"]
[null,"10.3 Avalanches/ Landslides ","Yes, causing run-off and wash down of sediments into the mud flats and Coral network","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D54,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F54,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Close communication and contact with Office Disaster and Management","Maintain Close communication and contact with Office Disaster and Management","Community opinion, External Expert opinion"]
[null,"10.4 Erosion and deposition","NA","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F55,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2}]
["11. Climate change and severe weather  \nThreats from long-term climatic changes which may be linked to global warming and other severe climatic/ weather events outside of the natural range of variation","11.1 Habitat shifting and alteration ","Yes, increase and extension of seagrass may be due to sedimentation and rising sea levels. (i.e. extension of brackish water upstream)","Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D56,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F56,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"No action","Need to monitor extent of shifting; assess the cause of this to come up with a practical strategy to mitigate","Community opinion, External Expert opinion"]
[null,"11.2 Droughts ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D57,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F57,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.3 Temperature extremes ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D58,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F58,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.4 Storms and flooding","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D59,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F59,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.5 Ocean acidification","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D60,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F60,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.6 Sea level rise","Yes, High tide mark has extended and causing extension of seagrass area. ","High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D61,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F61,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Currently no awareness/discussion","After this workshop, community awareness can be carried out during community meeting","Customary landowner knowledge and community opinion"]
[null,"11.7 Coral bleaching","Yes, weak coral break away due to high current during observed during the wet season. According to Turak ans Aitsi 2002, very little is directly related to what could be coral bleaching along the eastern side of the bay unlike on the western side of the bay area.","Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D62,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Low",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F62,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":1},"Awareness, on pollution and sustainably harvesting e.g. ban parrot fish","Awareness, on pollution and sustainably harvesting e.g. ban parrot fist","Community opinion, Research and monitoring"]
[null,"11.8 Saltwater coming into the protected area","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D63,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F63,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"11.9 Other climate changes","Yes, drop in sea temperature, ","Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D64,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Medium",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F64,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":2},"Awareness, now and into future","Awareness now and into the future","Staff experience, community opinion and Customary Landowner knowledge"]
["12. Cultural and social threats ","12.1 Loss of cultural links, traditional knowledge, language, dress, sing sings, respect and/or management practices","Yes, access to newer more modern tech and ways by the younger population having impact on their interest, respect for traditional ways and believes to the relationship between culture and environment","High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F65,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Awareness and traditional knowledge transfer","Include as a strategy in the review and update of the management plan","Staff experience, community opinion and Customary Landowner knowledge"]
[null,"12.2 Natural deterioration of important cultural site values ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D66,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F66,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"12.3 Destruction of cultural heritage buildings, gardens, sites etc ","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F67,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"12.4 Loss of land tenure","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D68,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F68,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"12.5 Other cultural/social threats","Yes, youths of today to very respectful and interested in the traditional ways of doing things and the skill and knowledge. This is impacting on cultural heritage as well as destruction/disturbance to the LMMA","High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"High",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F69,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":3},"Awareness and traditional knowledge transfer","Include as a strategy in the review and update of the management plan","Community opinion, Customary Landowner knowledge "]
["13. Governance problems","13.1 Conflicting policies across sectors","NA","select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0},"select",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F70,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":0}]
[null,"13.2 Confusion about government roles and responsibilities","Yes, no clear direction on government roles in supporting the management of the LMMA which affects all key values identified","Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F71,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Begin roundtable discussions with the provincial government and ward DDA/councillor","LLG/TLLMA inclusive Policy to be developed to deal with Environment Conservation","Staff experience, Community opinion,"]
[null,"13.3 Lack of coordination across all levels of government","Yes, affect all key values","Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Very high",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(F72,[1]Responses!$G$21:$H$26,2,FALSE)","v":4},"Nothing in place","Management team to include ward member ","Staff experience and community opinion"]

{"sheet":"Worst threat (T7)","index":10,"n_rows":6,"n_cols":4,"rows_kept":6,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[1,3,2,3],[0,0,0,1]]}
["Worst threats (Table 7)"]
["Rank order","Threat","Threat number ","Additional comments"]
[null,"(most significant first)","(copy from Table 6 e.g. 11.1)"]
[1,"Population Increase in the LMMA community and nearby areas",1.4,"With increase in population people are becoming careless, and are returning to doing over fishing, illegal fishing etc. This is a threat. Even women are doing this. Mainly due to increase in needs for cash. We need our management plan and the committee to be resourced"]
[2,"Governance: Lack of coordination across all levels of government",13.3,"Provincial government/LLG to work with TLMMA to review their  management plan, have it finalised, endorsed and included in the ward 8 of the Central Nakanai LLG development plan for funding and support. This should pave way also for the LMMA Activities to go up the government levels. The current situation is not helping the LMMA despite being recognised by the LLG."]
[3,"Climate Change-sea level rise",11.6,"High tide mark has extended and causing extension of seagrass area and affecting turtle nesting sites. "]

{"sheet":"Scorecard (T8)","index":11,"n_rows":99,"n_cols":14,"rows_kept":99,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,1,0,13]]}
[null,"METT Scorecard (Table 8)"]
["Category","Issue","Question","Select response (from pull down menu)","Response","Score","Possible score ","Weighting","Possible Weighted Score","Weighted score","Evidence & Justification (Reasons for choosing the response)","Actions to improve management","Information Source (Select from pull down menu)","Comments on information source (add additional sources here)"]
["Planning","1. Legal status","Does the protected area have legal status or is it established under “other effective means”? (e.g. in the case of private reserves is it covered by a covenant or similar)? ","D.   The protected area has been formally gazetted/approved by the national or provincial government or established through ‘other effective means’",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D3,Responses!B2:D7,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E3,Responses!C17:E22,2,FALSE)","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F3=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,{"$f":"G3*H3","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F3=\"not relevant\",\" \",F3*H3)","v":3},"It was recognised under the Bialla Local Level Government Marine Environment Management Law 2004, however Tarobi now comes under the  Central Nakanai LLG so this needs to be transferred/amended. This work needs to be done.","LMMA to be submitted to Central Nakanai LLG for its recognition or some other arrangement needs to be in place.","planning documents & government data","Management plan has to be revised and endorsed through Central Nakanai LLG, JCU has provided expert information as well to develop the plan"]
["Planning","2. Protected area objectives ","Is protected area management based on agreed objectives?","C.   The protected area has agreed objectives, and is only partly managed according to these objectives",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D4,Responses!B8:D13,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E4,Responses!C18:E23,2,FALSE)","v":2},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,{"$f":"G4*H4","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F4=\"not relevant\",\" \",F4*H4)","v":2},"There is an existing Management Plan that has agree objectives.","The current objectives are specific and are ok and should be maintained and updated if the Management plan is to be reviewed.","planning documents & government data"]
["Process","3. Protected area regulations or customary laws/rules","Are laws, rules or agreements in place to manage land or marine use and activities in the protected area in accordance with the management objectives? (includes hunting, logging, mining, fishing)","B.   Some regulations or customary laws for managing land/sea use and activities in the protected area exist but there are many weaknesses",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D5,Responses!B14:D19,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E5,Responses!C19:E24,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Yes, Example the traditional way of Merarobu and some rules in the management plan, like fees paid by non-members of Tarobi community to Tarobi LMMA site committee (TLMMASC) before they use, harvest or fish for any resources within Tarobi LMMA. The fees agreed are:\n• K30.00 for use of marine area or, fish and harvest marine resource\n• K20.00 for terrestrial (land) resources (e.g. beetle nut)","The management plan needs to be revised/updated and endorsed by the CNLLG for full implementation.","planning documents & government data","having a management plan is very important for effective management of LMMA"]
["Governance","3a. Clearly defined rules","Are the rules/laws/regulations relating to the protected area clearly defined and documented?","B.   Some protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, but there are some important gaps",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D6,Responses!B20:D25,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E6,Responses!C20:E25,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"Rules exists as agreed to in the Management plan. The biggest gap is resourcing of the TLMMA committees to effectively implement the rules.","Agree on innovative ways to attract resources to actually implement rules in the Management Plan. Education and awareness on the rules need to be done again.","staff experience"]
["Governance","3b. Clearly defined user/access rights ","Are the rights of people to use the protected area and its resources clearly defined and documented?","D.   Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, and anyone who wants to see or learn about this information is able to do so",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D7,Responses!B26:D31,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E7,Responses!C26:E31,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.25,0.75,0.75,"LMMA has a management plan with access rights documented, however since it is not final and endorsed, implementation is impossible.","Finalise and legalise the management plan so that use rights can be clearly defined and documented. The user/access rights should be clearly made known (again) to the wider community through awareness and workshops to help more people to understand and follow.","staff experience","incomplete management plan is the main stumbling block to the effective implementation of its activities in the plan."]
["Governance","3c. Awareness of user/access rights","What percentage of adults in the protected area and local community are aware of their user/access rights (e.g. to hunt, collect, fish etc)","D.   Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D8,Responses!B32:D37,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E8,Responses!C32:E37,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.25,0.75,0.75,"Awareness raising concerning the LMMA was widely done by TNC since 2007 and the community grew up knowing the rules.","Involvement of the community in actual management of the LMMA - Local community members to be identified in each clan to help in consistently educating their members on what the LMMA is all about including what can be done and what not to do.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4. Planning for land use or coastal/marine activities that occur outside the protected area","Does planning for land and coastal/marine uses outside the protected area recognise the protected area and contribute to achieving the management objectives?","B.   Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the long-term needs of the protected area, but the resulting land/sea uses do not harm the protected area ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D9,Responses!B38:D43,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E9,Responses!C38:EV43,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"There is currently little to no obvious  impacts however with logging almost starting nearby and oil palm expanding, there is big potential for the marine environment in the LMMA to be impacted. We already are seeing Illegal fishing by Hargy employees and outsiders. Gardening by these people near the rivers could also contribute to erosion and sedimentation.","The LMMA needs support to ensure the logging development and oil palm expansion take into consideration the potential impact they could have on the LMMA. The LMMA should be considered in their environment plans for monitoring of activities.","customary knowledge/Community opinion","This can be a challenge too as locals could potentially  be benefiting economically from such activities therefore some external expert advice and support is need by the locals in future planning"]
["Planning","4a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation","Planning and management in the wider catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provisions for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. air/water/noise pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D10,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.4,0.4,0.4,"This LMMA is isolated from other communities and so it has provisions of being well protected providing adequate environment conditions","surveillance and monitoring on the LMMA boundaries will protect the wider catchment/landscape","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","4b. Land and water planning for connectivity","Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D11,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0,"The current focus is mainly within the LMMA boundaries however there is spill-over observed as a result of LMMA closure areas. This was not factored into the management plan and needs to be looked at","There are initial thoughts of expanding the boundaries of the LMMA to cater for the terrestrial parts near the LMMA starting with a buffer."]
["Planning","4c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation","Planning addresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D12,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,0.3,"This is captured in the management targets (in the MP) example mange and reef/coral ecosystem given Tarobi hold a high percent of Mangrove and reef systems in Kimbe Bay ","Conditions are good and need to be maintained into the future through good monitoring apart from incidental and local knowledge reports"]
["Planning","5. Protected area design","Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecosystems and water catchments?","C.   The protected area size and boundaries (i.e. the design) are okay and allow us to achieve our objectives, but could be better (e.g. in relation to large-scale ecological processes or minimising threats)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D13,Responses!B44:D49,3,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2," The TLMMA contains a rich variety of marine habitats and supports many species including extensive mangroves, and sea-grass areas, and inshore, fringing and offshore barrier reefs. The area also includes two islands: Liliua Island - where the forest is intact and provides a roosting area for pigeons and other sea birds. The islands also have pristine beaches and provide important nesting area for turtles. It is also known to be a breeding and feeding area for dugong and dolphins as well as spawning aggregation sites for fish species. \n","Monitoring of the LMMA need to be strengthened/revived. Two estuaries exist within the LLMA boundaries and there is thought of extending the buffer inland.","staff experience"]
["Process","6a. On ground (land/sea) boundary marking of protected area","Is the protected area boundary marked on the ground (land/sea)?","B.   Some of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D14,Responses!B50:D55,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E14,Responses!C39:E44,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.3,0.89999999999999991,0.3,"LMMA boundaries have been marked on the map as well as physical markers (attributes) that  signal the boundaries (not all) are known to locals. These include the  Bilomi River mouth to the west and Gea River mouth to the east and also the Eastern and Western Tarobi Bays and the reefs they know E","Descriptions of such indicators to be described in the boundary description of the LMMA in the Management Plan","staff experience"]
["Process","6b. Map of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are marked on a map (Y or N)","Yes","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E15,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.4,0.4,0.4,"LMMA has a map ","Map attribute on LLG name to be changed from Bialla to Central Nakanai","planning documents & government data"]
["Process","6c. GIS mapping of protected area boundaries","The boundaries of the protected area are recorded in a GIS format (Y or N)","Yes","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E16,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,0.3,"Listed in CT Atlas","Update name of the LLG","planning documents & government data"]
["Process","6d. Boundary awareness of people who own the protected area ","What proportion of land owners (e.g. customary landowning adults) are aware of the protected area boundaries? ","D.   Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D17,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E17,Responses!C42:E47,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.5,1.5,1.5,"intensive awareness carried out by TNC","Do awareness to settlers, and visitors and neighbouring villages, e.g. Balla settlers"]
["Process","6e. Boundary awareness among surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area know the location of the boundary?","D.   Most (more than 75%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D18,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E18,Responses!C43:E48,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.5,1.5,1.5,"Neighbours still entering despite knowing of the protection boundaries","Go to the communities outside the boundary and carry out awareness so not only adults can be made aware, but also the children and younger generation to know about it growing up, e.g. Western side - Sisimi and Hoskins community, Eastern side side-silanga community","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6f. Respect of boundary by surrounding communities","What proportion of adults living around or near the protected area respect the boundary?","B.   Some (25-50%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D19,Responses!B56:D61,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E19,Responses!C44:E49,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.4,1.2000000000000002,0.4,"Few are still entering the boundaries even though they are aware of the boundaries.","Continue awareness to enforce rules, also have the management plan endorsed and penalties implemented","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","6g. Respect of boundaries by Local Level Government","Most or all relevant Local Level Governments are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D20,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.3,0.3,0.3,"LMMA boundary was known by Bialla LLG, however, after it came under Central Nanaka LLG , CENTRAL Nakanai now does not know about the boundaries.","Revise the management plan and introduce it to Central Nakankai LLG","planning documents & government data"]
["Process","6h. Respect of boundaries at the District level","Most or all of the relevant District level representatives are aware of the boundaries of the protected area (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D21,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.3,0.3,0,"The district has very limited knowledge about the LLMA and its boundaries. ","The Management Plan needs to be reviewed,  finalised and submitted to CNLLG and DDA. (Integrated into the LLG and District rolling 5year plans also)","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7. Management planning","Is there a management plan or similar and is it being implemented?","C. A management plan or similar exists but it is being partly implemented because of funding constraints or other problems",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D22,Responses!B62:D67,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E22,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"There is an existing plan done with TNC but it has been poorly implemented (and is due for review) due to lack of support from LLG (other gov't) and resource constraints","Revise management plan and seek assistance to support its full implementation (including having Central Nakanai commit to recognise and support)","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7a. Community/key people input into management plan","The management planning process for the protected area provides adequate and equal opportunity for key people (i.e. includes government, NGO, business etc) to have input into the management plan and to influence it (Do not include customary landowners in this question) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D23,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"The Management plan was developed with the help of TNC and provides the community, TNC, and Bialla LLG Marine Environment Advisory Committee to input in its review every five years","The identified need to be involved with the inclusion of the Central Nakanai LLG now the LMMA is under this LLG boundaries","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Planning","7b. Plan review of the management plan","There is an established schedule and process for people to regularly review and update the management plan (i.e. including agreed vision, objectives, actions etc) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D24,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"The management plan clearly states that the Management plan (Initial agreed) will be for 30 years and will be reviewed every 5 years. Updating the plan shall be done by the community, TNC, and Bialla LLG Marine Environment Advisory Committee five (5) years after the signing of the Agreement. This has to be reviewed.\n","The review of the plan should include CNLLG now that Tarobi falls in this LLG and that TNC or other partners should input into this","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","7c. Functioning protected area Management Committee","The Management Committee is formed and meets to discuss issues related to protected area management (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D25,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"The current members are new and have met only twice before coming together tot his meeting (METT 2)","Management committed needs to be supported through capacity building to implement the management plan.","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","7d. Are there clear decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee?","Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision making are clearly documented (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D26,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"This is captured in the management plan with specific reference to Part 3, section 9 to 16 of the Bialla Local Level Government Law 2004, which provides for the establishment of a Locally Managed Marine Area Committee (LMMAC), and spells out the committee’s functions, duties and responsibilities. Section 11 spells out the functions of the LMMAC, which includes assisting in the preparation of management plans, making recommendations to the Bialla LLG to declare areas of high marine value as an LMMA under the Law.","A simple structure to be included into the plan and that the LMMA committee needs to submit to Central Nakanai LLG or have all instruments transferred from Bialla LLG","staff experience"]
["Governance","7e. Decision-making structures and processes in relation to the management committee","Are the structures and processes for decision-making in the protected area well understood?","D.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are fully known and understood by the protected area owners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D27,Responses!B68:D73,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E27,Responses!C68:E73,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,0.25,0.75,0.75,"The committee is marked by the community and they entrust the decision making (LMMA) to this committee. There are zones based on clans who have representatives in the committee as the channel of communication/decision making. There are also community meetings and community days","Continue to educate and inform the community on any changes as a result of LLG change","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Governance","7f. Access to Management Committee decisions","The decisions of the Management Committee are made available to all people in the protected area community (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D28,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"Announcements at community meetings and ward days","maintain constant announcement","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Planning","8. Regular work plan","Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented?","A.  No regular work plan exists ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D29,Responses!B74:D79,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E29,Responses!C74:E79,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Ad hoc activity rollout on an as needed basis","To develop plans based on the management plan and to inform community of it.","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Input","9. Resource inventory","Do you have enough information to manage the area?","B.  There is poor information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) and this makes management difficult",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D30,Responses!B80:D85,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E30,Responses!C55:E60,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"There has not been any survey and assessment in the area since The Nature Conservancy left. Good scientific information on the status of the PA is lacking currently. Locals mainly do monitoring (sightings, incidental finds and use local knowledge, but this is not enough to help in coming up with a good revised plan)","Support is required to update information on current protected areas' resources","staff experience"]
["Input","10. Staff numbers","Are there enough people employed or paid to manage the protected area?","A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D31,Responses!B86:D91,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E31,Responses!C56:E61,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There is a need for staff, but currently there are no resources and capacity to do so.","Seek support with the community to have youths engage on rotational basis with some allowance. This could be captured in the management plan and paid through the collection of fees and fines","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Input","10a. Other unpaid people working on the protected area","Are there enough unpaid people (community or customary landowners) helping to manage the protected area?","B.  There are a few people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is inadequate to meet management needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D32,Responses!B92:D972,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E32,Responses!C57:E62,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Monitoring of sites by community e.g., monitoring of turtle nesting ","Provide incentives e.g., smoke/buai/tea or cash","staff experience"]
["Input","11. Knowledge and skills","Do the people involved in managing the protected area have the necessary knowledge and skills?","C. Knowledge and skills are good, but could be improved to better manage the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D33,Responses!B98:D103,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E33,Responses!C58:E63,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"There is little knowledge and skill amongst community members (those engaged by TNC). However, this knowledge is not used due to lack of equipment. Mainly Incidental observation is done","Need training and education to carry out effective monitoring and surveillance work and committee to do evaluation.","staff experience"]
["Input","12. Current budget","Is the current budget sufficient (from any source)?","A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D34,Responses!B104:D109,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E34,Responses!C59:E64,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No money is received to help with management.","Identify and come up with innovative ways to source funding. Work with the LLG to incorporate the plan into the 5year development plans so budget considers the LMMA activities (priority)","staff experience","A potential source is through the collection of fees, penalties as the current Management plans specifies certain amount to be given to the LLG (Bialla) and the community. The review should consider part of this going to such activities. But this will depend on the full implementation of the plan"]
["Input","13. Security of budget ","Is the budget secure (e.g. over the next 2-5 years)?","A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D35,Responses!B110:D115,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E35,Responses!C60:E65,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There is no budget and no budget into the future.","Identify and come up with innovative ways to source funding. Work with the LLG to incorporate the plan into the 5year development plans so budget considers the LMMA activities (priority)","staff experience","A potential source is through the collection of fees, penalties as the current Management plans specifies certain amount to be given to the LLG (Bialla) and the community. The review should consider part of this going to such activities. But this will depend on the full implementation of the plan"]
["Process","14. Management of budget ","Is the budget managed to meet important management needs?","Not relevant",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D36,Responses!B116:D121,2,FALSE)","v":"NA"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E36,Responses!C61:E66,2,FALSE)","v":"not relevant"},0,1,0," ","There is no budget to manage.","Introduce training in budget management when a budget is available."]
["Input","15a. Equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities sufficient for management needs?","A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D37,Responses!B122:D127,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E37,Responses!C62:E67,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"There was a dinghy at the establishment of the LMMA, however it broke down and no longer works.","Since the LMMA size is big, its impossible to monitor the entire place all at once so there is need for equipment such as more than one boat, drone ","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Process","15b. Maintenance of equipment and facilities","Are equipment and facilities adequately maintained?","A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D38,Responses!B128:D133,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E38,Responses!C63:E68,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"The boat is okay, but the motor has been spoiled due to no maintenance on it","If the management committee has a budget the a motor can be purchased to replace the damaged motor","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Process","16. Law enforcement","Can people (e.g. rangers or customary landowners – those with responsibility for managing the area) enforce protected area rules well enough?","A.  There is no effective human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D39,Responses!B134:D139,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E39,Responses!C64:E69,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No budget and resources to enforce laws","If government can realise the efforts made by the LMMA and can allocate some funding that would the good.","staff experience"]
["Governance","16a. Coordination of law enforcement","How good is the coordination between the protected area Management Committee/managers and other groups who assist with law enforcement?","B.  There is some effort to coordinate, but this does not work well",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D40,Responses!B140:D145,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E40,Responses!C65:E70,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.5,1.5,0.5,"The secretary of the management committee is also the village magistrate which is an existing bridge to some coordination with the government as the Ward councillor is not so involved.","More involvement of the Ward Councillor in the LMMA activities so coordination at the lowest level could start the process up. Community has some existing means of coordination that could be also used","customary knowledge/Community opinion","staff experience"]
["Governance","16b. Solving disputes or disagreements - documentation of processes","Are there process to solve disputes related to the protected area, and do people know about these processes?","C. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D41,Responses!B146:D151,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E41,Responses!C66:E71,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"Conflict resolution is identified in our Management Plan however since the  management is not effective since TNC left, we are trying to revive all this","Strengthen dispute resolution in the review of the management plan and make these arrangements known to the community","staff experience"]
["Governance","16c. Solving disputes or disagreements – suitability of the process","How suitable are the processes for resolving disputes or disagreements related to the protected area?","C. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for some protected area-related disputes, but not others",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D42,Responses!B152:D157,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E42,Responses!C67:E72,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.25,0.75,0.5,"Covers most but we need to look into this again","Strengthen dispute resolution in the review of the management plan and make these arrangements known to the community","staff experience"]
["Governance","16d. Solving disputes or disagreements - success ","How often do dispute resolution processes succeed in resolving protected area-related disputes?","B.  Some disputes are resolved (e.g. up to one-third of disputes), but most remain unresolved",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D43,Responses!B158:D163,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E43,Responses!C68:E73,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"Previously when the LMMA started, disputes were resolved, but it is not very effective today","Strengthen dispute resolution in the review of the management plan and make these arrangements known to the community","staff experience"]
["Governance","16e. Prosecution of law breakers","Are incidents of law breaking dealt with according to the rules/ law/ regulations?","A.  Prosecution/dealing with law often does not follow the rules/law/regulations",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D44,Responses!B164:D169,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E44,Responses!C69:E74,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"No case of prosecutions have been effected as we recently formed the management committee (new committee)","Review management plan and endorsement","staff experience"]
["Governance","16f. Prosecution of law breakers","All people are treated equally in relation to charges/prosecution for breaching protected area rules/laws/regulations (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D45,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"People are involved in the breaching of the rules like women, youth and get away with it. Some also collect fees without reporting cases for their benefit when they catch people doing illegal takes/harvest. There is wantok system. This includes colluding with outsiders","Have people to agree to work for the LMMA with some incentives to enforce the rules. Village court should be strengthened as the also enforce Law by LLGs","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Process","17. Protection systems/law enforcement - effectiveness","Are systems (e.g. patrols, permits, signage etc) in place to control access by ‘outsiders’ and resource use in the protected area ","B.    Protection systems/law enforcement are partially effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but law breaking is still common",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D46,Responses!B170:D175,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E46,Responses!C170:E175,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1," People are involved in the breaching of the rules like women, youth and get away with it. Some also collect fees without report cases for their benefit. There is wantok system. This includes colluding with outsiders","Have people to agree to work for the LMMA with some incentives to enforce the rules","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","17a. Reporting incidents","If people know of a threat to the protected area do they report this to the Management Committee/ authority?","A.    No – they keep quiet",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D47,Responses!B176:D181,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E47,Responses!C72:E77,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Often the people who witness the crime are also  involved and hence they do not report these incidents. Example women, youths and the few that do not support the LMMA","Education and awareness on the key values, threats and benefits for protection","staff experience"]
["Process","18.  Staff safety","Do protected area staff/people doing work or looking after the area have safe working conditions and does management prioritise safety? ","C.    The working environment for staff and community members is good, but improvements could be made",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D48,Responses!B182:D187,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E48,Responses!C73:E78,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"Generally good as community recognised them however can be risky at times","Regular community meetings and consultations on the work of staff be done. This should be detailed in the MP to be reviewed","staff experience"]
["Process","19. Research ","Is there a programme of management-orientated survey, inventory and research work?","A.     There is no survey, inventory or research work taking place in the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D49,Responses!B188:D193,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E49,Responses!C74:E79,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Nothing currently","Invite research institutions or partners to carry out surveys or train the locals to do this. This can be part of the management committees tasks/roles in the MP","staff experience"]
["Process","20. Monitoring and evaluation (of management activities)","Are management activities monitored, evaluated and acted on (or adapted)?","A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D50,Responses!B194:D199,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E50,Responses!C75:E80,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"Ad-hoc activities are not evaluated.","Seek support or engage in a partnership arrangement to have locals trained to do this","staff experience"]
["Process","21. Resource management ","Is active resource management of biodiversity and cultural activities (e.g. gardens, fishing areas, resource extraction sites) being undertaken?","B.  Some active management of the protected area is being implemented",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D51,Responses!B200:D205,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E51,Responses!C76:E81,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Done on ad hoc basis","Have the management plan revised and endorsed","staff experience"]
["Process","22. Climate change ","Is the protected area consciously managed to adapt to climate change?","B.  Some initial thought has taken place about likely impacts of climate change, but his has yet to be translated into management plans or actions",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D52,Responses!B206:D211,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E52,Responses!C77:E82,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"This was not included in the initial management plan.","Should be considered in the review of the MP but seek advice/support from the Provincial administration Climate change division","staff experience"]
["Process","23a. Carbon capture ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to prevent carbon loss?","A.  Preventing carbon loss has not been considered in protected area management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D53,Responses!B212:D217,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E53,Responses!C78:E83,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Nothing taking place currently.","Should be considered in the review of the MP but seek advice/support from the Provincial administration Climate change division","staff experience"]
["Process","23b. Carbon storage ","Is the protected area being consciously managed to encourage carbon storage?","A.  Carbon storage has not been considered in management of the protected area.",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D54,Responses!B218:D223,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E54,Responses!C79:E84,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Nothing taking place currently.","Should be considered in the review of the MP but seek advice/support from the Provincial administration Climate change division","staff experience"]
["Process","24. Ecosystem services – benefits are known","The ecosystem services provided by the protected area are well known (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D55,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.5,0.5,0.5,"There is some knowledge of what the ecosystems can provide and how it supports our customs, traditions and Tok ples.","Awareness raising is important in relation to ecosystem services and for the management plan to be finalised and implemented","staff experience"]
["Process","24a. Ecosystem services ","Does management of the protected area take into account actions to enhance the protected area’s provision of ecosystem services?","C.    Most ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D56,Responses!B224:D229,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E56,Responses!C224:E229,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,0.5,1.5,1,"We are the new Management committee members trying to revive the management of the LMMA. We also need to review the Management plan","Revive management plan and the committee members and endorsement","staff experience"]
["Process","25. Education and awareness ","Is there a planned education and awareness programme about the protected area and linked to its objectives and needs?","B.    There is a limited and irregular education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D57,Responses!B230:D235,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E57,Responses!C82:E87,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Education and awareness to target communities is a strategy in our management plan but is not effectively carried out","There is a need to review this and strengthen the efforts","staff experience"]
["Process","26. Government and commercial neighbour cooperation","Is there co-operation with adjacent government and commercial land/water users? ","A.    There is no contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D58,Responses!B236:D241,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E58,Responses!C83:E88,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"A factor is that the Ward Councillor is not very supportive (taking issues up) and also Hargy  Bialla and Bilomi companies do not consider the LMMA in their environment sustainability work","The Management committee needs to establish contact so the LMMA is considered in their planning","staff experience"]
["Process","27. Commercial tourism operators","Do commercial tour operators cooperate and contribute to protected area management and provide benefits to the community?","A.  There is little or no contact between the Management Committee/ managers and tourism operators using the protected area",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D59,Responses!B242:D247,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E59,Responses!C84:E89,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No contact at the moment","Seek support to assess the extent of tourism potential (ecotourism activities) than try to partner with operators using the assessment as the basis for viability","staff experience"]
["Process","28. Fees","If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?","A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D60,Responses!B248:D253,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E60,Responses!C85:E90,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"The committee is new, LLG has changed, MP needs to be reviewed and recognised by the LLG. There is weak enforcement of fees.","Have people to enforce after education and awareness of the penalties are reviewed and made known to everyone.","staff experience"]
["Output","29. Visitor facilities and services","Are visitor facilities and services adequate?","A.  There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D61,Responses!B254:D259,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E61,Responses!C86:E91,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,1,3,0,"No facilities currently.","The profile of the LMMA needs to be raised by using innovative means and as identified in the assessment of tourism potential. (this could determine the appropriateness and location of facilities)","staff experience"]
["Process","30. Customary landowners","Do customary landowners, who reside in or regularly use the protected area, have input into management decisions?","B.    Customary landowners have some input into discussions relating to management, but no direct role in management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D62,Responses!B260:D265,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E62,Responses!C87:E92,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Decision making process is not clear but they (customary LOs) contribute through their clans and respective zone meetings","need to finalise the management plan","staff experience"]
["Process","31. Local communities and others with access or user ‘rights’","Do local communities and other rights’ holders living in or near the protected area, have input into relevant management decisions?","B.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have some input into discussions relating to the management of the protected area, but no direct role in management",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D63,Responses!B266:D271,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E63,Responses!C88:E93,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Input are in the form of suggestions and contributions during village meeting or ward days. Traditionally also is through their matrilineal ties with the landowners","A representative should be considered in the Management committee or in any sub-committee. A decision structure should also be developed by the committee"]
["Governance","31a. Proportion of women involved in decision making related to the protected area","What percentage of women in the protected area community are involved in decision making about the protected area?","A.     Very few (less than 25%)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D64,Responses!B272:D277,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E64,Responses!C89:E94,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.25,0.75,0,"Many women are also involved in harvesting of resources, e.g. corals harvesting so feel defensive","Empower the women to see the importance of protection by doing awareness to women groups. (This can be also translated into skills training in sewing or allowing access for market purposes) This should be considered in the review of the MP. Also include women in the protection work.","staff experience"]
["Governance","31b. Participation of women in the full range of protected area decisions","Women are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D65,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Generally NO despite having a women's representative on the Committee","Clearly identify the role of the women's representative which should include engaging and conducting women's meeting or discussing LMMA issues in such group meetings","staff experience"]
["Governance","31c. Influence of women in decision making","How much influence do women have on protected-area related decisions?","B.     Women have a small influence on protected area decisions ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D66,Responses!B278:D283,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E66,Responses!C278:E283,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,0.75,0.25,"Women are also involved in harvesting of resources, e.g. corals harvesting so feel defensive. Traditionally in matrilineal societies, women provide the advice to their brothers who become the mouth piece","Educate women to understand the LMMA better so they can participate in activities be","staff experience"]
["Governance","31d. Participation of young people in the full range of protected area decisions","Young people (under 20 years of age) are involved in protected area decision making in relation to all issues relevant to protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D67,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Youths are not involved in decision making but a few help implement them while many others  are involved in destroying these values/resources","Awareness and involvement","staff experience"]
["Governance","31e. Influence of young people in decision making","How much influence do young people (under 20 years of age) have on protected-area related decisions?","B.    Young people have a small influence on protected area decisions ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D68,Responses!B284:D289,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E68,Responses!C93:E98,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,0.25,{"$f":"G68*H68","v":0.75},{"$f":"IF(F68=\"not relevant\",\" \",F68*H68)","v":0.25},"Youths have little or no influence but a few help implement them while many others  are involved in destroying these values/resources","Awareness and involvement","staff experience"]
["Governance","31f. Overall participation of people in the full range of protected area decisions ","There is opportunity for any person or group in the protected area and wider community to become involved in protected area decision making (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D69,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Not clearly identified apart from the traditional decision making means","Awareness and involvement","staff experience"]
["Output","31g. Communication and trust between the customary landowners and …","1. CEPA (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D70,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"There is no communication","to establish contact","staff experience"]
["Output",null,"2. Provincial Government (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D71,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.5,0.5,0,"There is no communication","to establish contact","staff experience"]
["Output",null,"3. Local Level Government (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D72,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"Currently nothing with the Central Nakanai LLG","to establish contact","staff experience"]
["Output",null,"4.  District representatives (e.g. District Development Authority) (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D73,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"There is no communication","to establish contact","staff experience"]
["Output",null,"5. Ward representatives (e.g. Ward Development Committee) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D74,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,0.25,0.25,0.25,"The Ward councillor is listed as a member in the Committee composition agreed to in the Management plan (one to be reviewed) but currently is not active.","Re-engage the ward councillor and identify his/her role clearly. This could also mean educate the Tarobi representative to the Ward Development Committee to advocate for the LMMA in meetings","staff experience"]
["Output",null,"6. NGOs (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D75,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,0.25,0.25,0,"There is no communication","to establish contact","staff experience"]
["Output","31h. Community welfare","Programmes are being implemented to improve community/customary landowners’ welfare, while conserving protected area resources (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D76,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"This is  a core reason for the establishment of the LMMA. To continue to support community livelihoods through better resource use and management (LMMA)","Identify and implement value adding activities to improve on what is happening now. Example - assist in linking markets and bring in financial trainings to locals. Hargy Oil Palm should be contacted as many community members also earn cash income from oil palm.","external expert opinion"]
["Output","31i. Level of support","The local community and customary landowners actively support the protected area (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D77,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Very limited support, level of support has dropped since LMMA has dropped down, many community members are involved in destroying the resources","management plan to be revived, workshops/assessments such as the METT can also be run at the PA site for wider participation","staff experience"]
["Output","32. Livelihood benefits","Are the protected area and related conservation and development projects providing sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners, e.g. income/ employment?","C.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects make a moderate contribution to livelihoods (many people benefit)",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D78,Responses!B290:D295,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E78,Responses!C290:E295,2,FALSE)","v":2},{"$f":"IF(F78=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,2,"Access to market is limited , transport factors, market day, catch size, seasonal harvest e.g., sea cucumber","Provide transport to market, financial and literacy training, to assist communities to manage their incomes, introduce alternated activities ","customary knowledge/Community opinion","The management plan also allows for a portion of the fees/fine to be paid back to local owners"]
["Governance","32a. Benefit-sharing arrangements - effectiveness","How effective are benefit-sharing arrangements in delivering benefits to all in the protected area?","A.  There are no benefit-sharing arrangements in place",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D79,Responses!B296:D301,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E79,Responses!C105:E110,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.5,1.5,0,"Mainly based on the agreed customary access and limitations but there is increase in people taking as they wish. The management plan identified how fees/fine will be distributed but this is not being implement as no collection or fines have been duly made.","Distribution of benefits should be updated in the review of the plan to clearly identify the types and level of benefits. Example how fees/fines will be distributed, How surplus catches can be distributed to reduce disturbance and footprint in the zones (LMMA)","customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
["Governance","32b. Distribution of livelihood benefits","Are the livelihood benefits from the protected area equitably shared?","A.  The livelihood benefits provided by the protected area are not shared equitably by the local communities/customary landowners",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D80,Responses!B302:D307,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E80,Responses!C106:E111,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.25,0.75,0,"Mainly due to the reason that benefits derived are consumed at household or family units ","Include into the MP a process, or allowance for communal activities (like fishing and selling) where after some time part of this could be distributed as assistance to community member indirectly, e.g.; school fee payment","staff experience"]
["Governance","32c Change in livelihoods over the past five years","There has been an improvement in livelihood outcomes for the community over the past five years? (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D81,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},null,1,0.25,0.25,0,"Access to market is limited , transport factors, market day, catch size restrictions, seasonal harvest e.g., sea cucumber. Also use of marine resources is mainly for household consumption","Livelihoods programs to be considered in the review of the MP (indicators to be identified and agreed to for inclusion)"]
["Output","33. Threats","Are the threats to the main values of the protected area being effectively addressed?","B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D82,Responses!B308:D313,2,FALSE)","v":"B "},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E82,Responses!C108:E113,2,FALSE)","v":1},3,1,3,1,"Monitoring and surveillance committee  are not resourced to carry out assessment on the stresses and threats.","Mobilise through consultation youth to work as volunteers to help manage values by doing monitoring/surveillance (potentially seek support from Provincial Gov't)"]
["Output","34. Connectivity (linkages to other natural systems)","Have the requirements for connectivity (i.e. direct linkages to other natural ecosystems) been assessed and implemented?","D.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and necessary actions have been taken to achieve functional connectivity",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D83,Responses!B314:D319,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E83,Responses!C109:E114,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,1,3,3,"Connectivity was incorporated in most Kimbe Bay LMMAs by TNC including Tarobi. Example it included system wide approach that recognised patterns of connectivity within and amongst ecosystems and where possible included entire biological units (e.g.: reef systems, mangroves etc.) that possibly have buffers. Tarobi does include this and has functional connectivity (Green, A, et al. 2007)","Seek advice from external experts for monitoring and assessment of functional connectivity"]
["Outcome","35. Condition of natural values","What is the condition of the important natural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","C.  Some natural values are being partly degraded, but the most important natural values have not been significantly impacted",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D84,Responses!B320:D325,2,FALSE)","v":"C"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E84,Responses!C110:E115,2,FALSE)","v":2},3,1,3,2,"Increase in population continues to see more want for cash where fishing pressure increased (not a big threat) that has seen impacts of fish stocks (rabbit fish) nilpis, and a few others. Impact of Climate change on the mangroves and turtle nesting areas.","Consider current and future population trends and changing resource use in the management plan review"]
["Process","35a. Condition of natural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of natural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D85,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Mainly limited to turtle nesting areas. Most others are just observation by locals during visits and based on their local knowledge","Develop a routine program to patrol and invite local NGOs, Prov. Administration to assist in training and assessment.","customary knowledge/Community opinion","Staff experience"]
["Process","35b. Management programmes","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to natural values (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D86,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"This are done on ad-hoc basis.","Develop a routine program to patrol and invite local NGOs, Prov. Administration to assist in training and assessment."]
["Process","35c. Actions implemented as routine part of management","Activities to maintain natural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D87,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Activities are not routine but on needs basis as seen by concerned members. This are done on ad-hoc basis due to lack of resources and new committee members just starting","Develop a routine program to patrol and invite local NGOs, Prov. Administration to assist in training and assessment."]
["Outcome","36. Condition of cultural values","What is the condition of the important cultural values of the protected area, as compared to five to ten years ago?","D.  Cultural values are predominantly intact ",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D88,Responses!B326:D331,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E88,Responses!C114:E119,2,FALSE)","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F88=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,3,"Locals still practice and respect their cultural values example the traditional practice of closures reefs/fishing grounds help manage culturally important fish species like the groupers, snappers.","Recognise traditional practices that help continue to preserve cultural values"]
["Process","36a. Condition of cultural values - assessment based on research and/or monitoring and evaluation","The assessment of the condition of cultural values is based on research and/or monitoring (this includes both western science and traditional methods) (Y or N)","Yes",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D89,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":1},1,1,1,1,"Mainly done by local based on the traditional ways and custom in respective clans/groups","Recognise traditional practices that help continue to preserve cultural values"]
["Process","36b. Management programmes for cultural values","Specific management programmes or approaches are being implemented to address threats to cultural values (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D90,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Similar to the natural values. However because it is cultural people understand and fear","Recognise traditional practices that help continue to preserve cultural values"]
["Process","36c. Actions implemented as routine part of management to protect cultural values","Activities to maintain cultural values are a routine part of protected area management (Y or N)","No",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D91,Responses!$E$2:$F$4,2,FALSE)","v":0},1,1,1,0,"Similar to the natural values. However because it is cultural people understand and fear","Recognise traditional practices that help continue to preserve cultural values"]
["Outcome","37. Conservation status of key plant or animal species","Has the status of key species changed over the last five (5) years?","D.    The conservation status of key species is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D92,Responses!B332:D337,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E92,Responses!C118:E123,2,FALSE)","v":3},{"$f":"IF(F92=\"not relevant\",0,3)","v":3},1,3,3,"People still have a good sense of the zones","Enter into partnership with Mahonia Dari to provide training and awareness"]
["Outcome","38. Conservation status of habitats","Has the status of habitats changed over the last five (5) years?","D.    The conservation status of habitats is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D93,Responses!B338:D343,2,FALSE)","v":"D"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E93,Responses!C343:E348,2,FALSE)","v":3},3,1,3,3,"People still have a good sense of the zones","Enter into partnership with Mahonia Dari to provide training and awareness"]
["Input","39a. Level of support - CEPA","What support has CEPA provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D94,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E94,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,"Since DEC and now CEPA","Seek to establish or strengthen partnership through working programs"]
["Input","39b. Level of support – Provincial Government(s)","What support has/have the provincial government(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D95,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E95,Responses!C345:E350,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,"No support has been given to the LMMA","Seek to establish or strengthen partnership through working programs"]
["Input","39c. Level of support – District(s)","What support has/have the District(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D96,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E96,Responses!C345:E350,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,"No support has been given to the LMMA","Seek to establish or strengthen partnership through working programs"]
["Input","39d. Level of support – LLG(s)","What support has/have the LLG(s) provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D97,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E97,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,"No support from Central Nakanai LLG. The LMMA was recognised under Bialla Rural LLG however no further support was given","Seek to establish or strengthen partnership through working programs"]
["Input","39e. Level of support – NGOs","What support have NGOs provided to enhance the management effectiveness of the protected area over the last five years?","A.  None",{"$f":"VLOOKUP(D98,Responses!B344:D349,2,FALSE)","v":"A"},{"$f":"VLOOKUP(E98,Responses!C344:E349,2,FALSE)","v":0},3,0.2,0.60000000000000009,0,"Not since TNC came in to help establish this LMMA.  JCU did some research which we hope to improve our LMMA","Seek to establish or strengthen partnership through working programs"]
[null,"TOTAL",null,null,null,{"$f":"SUM(F3:F98)","v":85},{"$f":"SUM(G3:G98)","v":219},null,{"$f":"SUM(I3:I98)","v":151.39999999999998},{"$f":"SUM(J3:J98)","v":60.400000000000006}," "]

{"sheet":"Responses","index":12,"n_rows":349,"n_cols":12,"rows_kept":349,"cut":false,"hidden":true,"merged":[]}
["Question",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Condition","Trend",null,"select"]
[1,"select","blank","blank","select","blank",null,"Very good","Increasing",null,"A lot",2]
[null,"A.   The protected area is not gazetted/approved by national or provincial government or has not been established through ‘other effective means’","A",0,"Yes",1,null,"Good","Stable",null,"Some",1]
[null,"B.   There is agreement that the protected area should be established but the process has not begun","B ",1,"No",0,null,"Fair","Decreasing",null,"None",0]
[null,"C.   The protected area is in the process of being established, but the process is incomplete","C",2,null,null,null,"Poor","Don't know",null,"Don't know","DK"]
[null,"D.   The protected area has been formally gazetted/approved by the national or provincial government or established through ‘other effective means’","D",3,null,null,null,"Don't know"]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[2,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area to guide management","A",0]
[null,"B.   The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives","B ",1]
[null,"C.   The protected area has agreed objectives, and is only partly managed according to these objectives","C",2,null,null,"research & monitoring"]
[null,"D.   The protected area has agreed objectives and is fully managed to meet these objectives","D",3,null,null,"planning documents & government data"]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant",null,null,"staff experience"]
[3,"select","blank","blank",null,null,"external expert opinion"]
[null,"A.   There are no regulations or customary laws or agreements for managing land and marine use and activities in the protected area ","A",0,null,null,"customary knowledge/Community opinion"]
[null,"B.   Some regulations or customary laws for managing land/sea use and activities in the protected area exist but there are many weaknesses","B ",1,null,null,"other (specify)"]
[null,"C.   Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist, but there are some weaknesses or gaps","C",2]
[null,"D.   Regulations or customary laws for managing land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant",null,null,"threat severity"]
["3a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Protected area-related rules/laws/regulations are not clearly defined and documented","A",0,null,null,"select"]
[null,"B.   Some protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, but there are some important gaps","B ",1,null,null,"Very high"]
[null,"C.   Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented, with no important gaps","C",2,null,null,"High"]
[null,"D.   Most protected area-related rules/laws/ regulations are clearly defined and documented and anyone who wants to see/review/or know this information is able to do so","D",3,null,null,"Medium"]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant",null,null,"Low"]
["3b","select","blank","blank",null,null,"none"]
[null,"A.   The customary landowners/local community do not have any protected area-related user/access rights relating to accessing resources from the protected area (i.e. ability to hunt, fish or gather)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some of the rights to use/access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most of the user/access rights to access resources from the protected area are clearly defined and documented, and anyone who wants to see or learn about this information is able to do so","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["3c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[4,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the needs of the protected area and the resulting land/sea uses and policies harm the protected area ","A",0]
[null,"B.   Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area does not take into account the long-term needs of the protected area, but the resulting land/sea uses do not harm the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Planning for the land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area takes into account some of the long-term needs of the protected area, and the resulting land/sea uses partially support the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D.   Planning for land/marine uses that occur outside the protected area fully takes into account the long-term needs of the protected area and seeks to support the protected area","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[5,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), and this makes achieving the major management objectives very difficult ","A",0]
[null,"B.   The protected area is too small, or the boundaries are not a good shape (i.e. poor design), but we are working to make it better (e.g. agreements with adjacent land/sea owners for wildlife corridors, or improving water catchment management)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   The protected area size and boundaries (i.e. the design) are okay and allow us to achieve our objectives, but could be better (e.g. in relation to large-scale ecological processes or minimising threats)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Protected area size and the boundaries (i.e. the design) are very good and we can achieve our objectives","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["6a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   None or only a small section of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground ","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Most of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground","C",2]
[null,"D.   All of the protected area boundary is marked on the ground (this could include a fence)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["6def","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.   Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.   Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[7,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no management plan for the protected area, or the management plan was produced a long time ago and is not being implemented","A",0]
[null,"B.  A management plan or similar is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A management plan or similar exists but it is being partly implemented because of funding constraints or other problems","C",2]
[null,"D. A management plan or similar exists and is being fully implemented","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["7e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are not known or understood by the protected area owners","A",0]
[null,"B.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are little known or understood by the protected area owners","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are mostly known and understood by the protected area owners","C",2]
[null,"D.   Structures and processes in relation to the Management Committee and related protected area decision-making are fully known and understood by the protected area owners","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[8,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  No regular work plan exists ","A",0]
[null,"B.  A regular work plan exists but only some of the activities are implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. A regular work plan exists, and many activities are implemented","C",2]
[null,"D. A regular work plan exists, and all activities are implemented","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[9,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no information available about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological process and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is poor information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) and this makes management difficult","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is good Information about the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) for most areas of planning and decision making","C",2]
[null,"D. There is very good Information on the protected area (e.g. critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values) to support all areas of planning and decision making ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[10,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no staff/people paid to work on the protected area, but they are ’needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some paid staff/people who are responsible for important management activities, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. Paid staff numbers are good and support management of the protected area, but this is below what is required to meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. Paid staff/people numbers are very good and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["10a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no community members or customary landowners helping to manage the protected area, but they are needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are a few people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is inadequate to meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some people to do important management activities in the protected area, but this is below what is required to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. There are plenty of people helping to manage the protected area and fully meet the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[11,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Knowledge and skills needed to manage the protected area are very poor or inadequate","A",0]
[null,"B.  Knowledge and skills are poor relative to the needs of the protected area","B ",1]
[null,"C. Knowledge and skills are good, but could be improved to better manage the protected area","C",2]
[null,"D. Knowledge and skills to manage the protected area are very good and they meet the management needs of the area","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[12,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no money from any source to manage the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some money, but this is a serious problem that limits management effectiveness and should be increased to fully meet management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. The available budget is acceptable but could be increased to fully meet management needs","C",2]
[null,"D. The available budget is sufficient and fully meets the management needs of the protected area","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[13,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no secure budget to manage the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is very little budget security, and the protected area could not meet its management needs without outside funding","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is a reasonably secure budget for regular operation of the protected area to enable it to meet its management needs, but many initiatives are reliant on outside funding","C",2]
[null,"D. There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[14,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines management effectiveness ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Budget management is poor and constrains management effectiveness","B ",1]
[null,"C. Budget management is good but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D. Budget management is very good and meets management needs","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["15a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs","A",0]
[null,"B.  There are some equipment and facilities, but these are inadequate for most management needs","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are sufficient equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake most management tasks, but there are some gaps","C",2]
[null,"D. There are very good equipment and facilities, and these enable us to undertake all management tasks","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["15b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no maintenance of equipment and facilities","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some occasional maintenance of equipment and facilities ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is much ongoing, basic maintenance of equipment and facilities ","C",2]
[null,"D. Equipment and facilities are fully maintained","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[16,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no effective human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are big gaps or deficiencies","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is acceptable human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements, but there are a few gaps or deficiencies","C",2]
[null,"D. There is excellent human capacity, resources or authority to enforce protected area legislation and regulations OR community agreements","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["16a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no coordination","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is some effort to coordinate, but this does not work well","B ",1]
[null,"C. Coordination is good, but with some occasional problems","C",2]
[null,"D. Coordination is very good","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["16b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution and hence no documentation","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known, but others are not","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known","C",2]
[null,"D. Most of the relevant dispute resolution processes are clearly documented or known and anyone who wants to see and review/discuss this information is able to do so","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["16c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no processes for dispute resolution","A",0]
[null,"B.  Dispute resolution processes are not suitable for solving protected area-related disputes","B ",1]
[null,"C. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for some protected area-related disputes, but not others","C",2]
[null,"D. Dispute resolution processes are suitable for most or all types of protected area-related disputes","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["16d","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Almost never as very few people are aware of the processes and are able to use them","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some disputes are resolved (e.g. up to one-third of disputes), but most remain unresolved","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most disputes are resolved, but often there are some people who remain dissatisfied","C",2]
[null,"D. Almost all disputes are resolved and normally all people in the dispute are satisfied with the outcome","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["16e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Prosecution/dealing with law often does not follow the rules/law/regulations","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but irregularities are common","B ",1]
[null,"C. Most incidents are handled according to the rules/law/regulations, but there are occasional irregularities","C",2]
[null,"D. All incidents are properly handled according to the rules/law/regulations","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[17,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Protection systems/law enforcement (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but are required","A",0]
[null,"B.    Protection systems/law enforcement are partially effective in controlling access/ resource use by ‘outsiders’, but law breaking is still common","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Protection systems/law enforcement are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, but there are still occasional cases of law breaking","C",2]
[null,"D.    Protection systems/law enforcement are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/resource use by ‘outsiders’, so law breaking is very rare","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["17a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    No – they keep quiet","A",0]
[null,"B.    Sometimes it is reported, but most times not","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most times it is reported, although sometimes not","C",2]
[null,"D.    Almost always reported in a timely manner, with very few exceptions","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[18,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     The working environment for staff and community members is very poor","A",0]
[null,"B.     The working environment for staff and community members is poor ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The working environment for staff and community members is good, but improvements could be made","C",2]
[null,"D.    The working environment for staff and community members is very good as it is an important consideration for the protected area managers ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[19,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no survey, inventory or research work taking place in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some survey, inventory or research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is survey, inventory or research work but it is only partly directed towards the needs of protected area management ","C",2]
[null,"D.    There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey, inventory or research work, which is relevant to management needs","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[20,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.     There is some unplanned and irregular monitoring and evaluation of the performance of management activities, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results","B ",1]
[null,"C.    There is agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation, but results do not feed back into management","C",2]
[null,"D.    A good system of monitoring and evaluation exists, is well implemented and is used to adapt and improve management","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[21,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is no active resource management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values, but it is needed","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some active management of the protected area is being implemented","B ",1]
[null,"C. Many of the requirements for active management of the protected area are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed","C",2]
[null,"D. Requirements for active management of the protected area are being fully implemented","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[22,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There have been no efforts to consider adaptation to climate change in management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some initial thought has taken place about likely impacts of climate change, but his has yet to be translated into management plans or actions","B ",1]
[null,"C. Limited plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, which may or may not be implemented.","C",2]
[null,"D. Detailed plans have been drawn up about how to adapt management to predicted climate change, and these are already being implemented. ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["23a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Preventing carbon loss has not been considered in protected area management","A",0]
[null,"B.  Preventing carbon loss has been considered in general terms, but is not reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures to prevent carbon loss","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to prevent carbon loss","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["23b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Carbon storage has not been considered in management of the protected area.","A",0]
[null,"B.  Carbon storage has been considered in general terms, but is not significantly reflected in management of the protected area ","B ",1]
[null,"C. There are some measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","C",2]
[null,"D. There are several active measures in place to increase carbon dioxide storage","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["24a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     No ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed","A",0]
[null,"B.    A few ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Most ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","C",2]
[null,"D.    All ecosystem services delivered by the protected area are managed to ensure their continued delivery ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[25,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","A",0]
[null,"B.    There is a limited and irregular education and awareness programme linked to the protected area’s objectives and needs","B ",1]
[null,"C.   There is an education and awareness programme, but it only partly meets the needs of protected area management and could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   There is an appropriate and effective education and awareness programme linked to achieving the protected area’s objectives and needs","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[26,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    There is no contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users but only some cooperation on management","B ",1]
[null,"C. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, but only some co-operation on management","C",2]
[null,"D. There is regular contact between the Management Committee/managers and neighbouring government and commercial land/water users, and substantial (or full) co-operation on management","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[27,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There is little or no contact between the Management Committee/ managers and tourism operators using the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.  There is contact between the protected area Management Committee/managers and tourism operators, and this is confined largely to administrative or regulatory matters, with few benefits to the customary landowners","B ",1]
[null,"C.  There is contact and limited co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide some benefits to the customary landowners","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is contact and good co-operation between the Management Committee/managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, maintain protected area values and provide long-term benefits to the customary landowners","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[28,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Although fees can be applied, they are not collected","A",0]
[null,"B.    Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its surroundings","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","C",2]
[null,"D.   Fees are collected and make a good contribution to the protected area and its surroundings","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[29,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need","A",0]
[null,"B.  Visitor facilities and services are poor - they do not meet the needs of current visitor levels ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Visitor facilities and services are good – they meet the needs of the current visitor levels but could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.  Visitor facilities and services are very good for current levels of visitation","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[30,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Customary landowners have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Customary landowners have some input into discussions relating to management, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Customary landowners directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Customary landowners fully participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, (e.g. outright ownership or co-management arrangement)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[31,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area","A",0]
[null,"B.    Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ have some input into discussions relating to the management of the protected area, but no direct role in management","B ",1]
[null,"C.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ contribute to some relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, but their involvement could be improved","C",2]
[null,"D.   Local communities and others with ‘access/user rights’ directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to the management of the protected area, e.g. co-management","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["31a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Very few (less than 25%)","A",0]
[null,"B.     Some (25-50%)","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Many (51-75%)","C",2]
[null,"D.    Most (more than 75%)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["31c","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.     Women have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.     Women have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Women can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Women are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["31e","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    Young people (under 20 years of age) have no influence on any protected area-related decisions","A",0]
[null,"B.    Young people have a small influence on protected area decisions ","B ",1]
[null,"C.    Young people can often influence protected area decisions","C",2]
[null,"D.    Young people are fully effective in influencing protected area decisions ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[32,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The protected area does not deliver any livelihood benefits to local communities/ customary landowners (no people benefit)","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects exist, but are not significant contributors to livelihoods (only a few people benefit)","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits to local communities/customary landowners from the protected area and related conservation and development projects make a moderate contribution to livelihoods (many people benefit)","C",2]
[null,"D.  There is a major flow of sustained livelihood benefits to local communities/customary landowners from activities associated with the protected area (most people benefit)","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["32a","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  There are no benefit-sharing arrangements in place","A",0]
[null,"B.  Benefits have been received, but they are much less than what was decided","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Benefits have been received, but they are less than what was decided","C",2]
[null,"D.  Benefits have been received and they are fully in line with, or even better than what was decided","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["32b","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The livelihood benefits provided by the protected area are not shared equitably by the local communities/customary landowners","A",0]
[null,"B.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitable among only some groups and individuals in the local communities/ customary landowners ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among most groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","C",2]
[null,"D.  Livelihood benefits from the protected area are shared equitably among all groups and individuals in the local communities/customary landowners ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[33,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The threats to the main values are not being addressed by management","A",0]
[null,"B.  The threats to the main values are only being managed at a minimal level","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Most of the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","C",2]
[null,"D.  All the significant threats to the main values are being substantially addressed by management","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[34,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  The requirements for connectivity have not been assessed ","A",0]
[null,"B.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed but necessary actions have not been taken","B ",1]
[null,"C.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and some actions have been taken, but not sufficient to achieve functional connectivity","C",2]
[null,"D.  The requirements for connectivity have been assessed and necessary actions have been taken to achieve functional connectivity","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[35,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important natural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some natural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some natural values are being partly degraded, but the most important natural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Natural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[36,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  Many important cultural values are being severely degraded ","A",0]
[null,"B.  Some cultural values are being severely degraded ","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some cultural values are being partly degraded, but the most important cultural values have not been significantly impacted","C",2]
[null,"D.  Cultural values are predominantly intact ","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[37,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of key species is undesirable, but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of key species is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
[38,"select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has worsened over the last five years","A",0]
[null,"B.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable and has remained unchanged over the last five years","B ",1]
[null,"C.    The conservation status of habitats is undesirable but has improved over the last five years","C",2]
[null,"D.    The conservation status of habitats is desirable or has significantly improved over the last five years","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]
["39abcde","select","blank","blank"]
[null,"A.  None","A",0]
[null,"B.  A little","B ",1]
[null,"C.  Some","C",2]
[null,"D.  Sufficient","D",3]
[null,"Not relevant","NA","not relevant"]

{"sheet":"ConditTrend (T9)","index":13,"n_rows":9,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":9,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,4]]}
["Detailed assessment of values (Condition & Trend) (Table 9)"]
["Key value ","Condition","Trend","Justification for the rating","Ways to improve the value",null,"Condition"]
["Values will be inserted from Table 3","Insert Score ","Insert Score","Insert text to explain the score or rating that was selected",null,null,"VG"]
[null,"Select from pull down menu","Select from pull down menu",null,null,null,"G"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B4","v":"Mangroves (systems)"},"Very good","Stable","Given the accessibility of the LMMA, and the  limited and specific use of mangrove (e.g.; material for certain parts of the house)","Nearby villages Karapi, Rapuri, Vavua, Koimumu other Hoskins villages, Sesimi, Kaiamu, Sulu, Bilomi company employees and Mamota residents need to be made aware not to illegally use/harvest mangroves",null,"F"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B5","v":"Sea grass (system)"},"Very good","Increasing","Unlike many other areas/LMMAs, Tarobi people do not depend on or eat seagrass (i.e. there is reduced taking of this resource)",null,null,"P"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B6","v":"Coral systems (corals and reefs)"},"Very good","Increasing","Despite the ineffectiveness of management of the LMMA, most of the users  generally observe the zones. It is only mainly a few like some women and the youth who engage in unsustainable practices","It is hard to actually monitor based on local knowledge. There is a need of a monitoring program with help from outside (like JCU or CEPA)",null,"DK"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B7","v":"Turtle nesting"},"Good","Stable","Generally is good and stable. Requires better monitoring","Monitor impact of sea level rise on the nesting sites",null,"Score"]
[{"$f":"'Key Values (T3)'!B8","v":"Cultural sites"},"Very good","Stable","Population is increasing and the young people are not very interest in pasin kastom. Many are also afraid of masalai in the sites.",null,null,"I"]

{"sheet":"Recomm (T10)","index":14,"n_rows":8,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":8,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,2]]}
["Recommendations (Table 10)"]
["Recommendations",1,2,3,4]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"},"Review and update the Management Plan, with help/support from relevant stakeholders like CEPA and NFA and have TLMMA also recognise by Central Nakanai LLG","Equipment including boat and outboard motor.","Support from CEPA/GEF (other relevant agencies/NGO/institutions) to conduct capacity building for PA on site at Tarobi (e.g. tourism, money savings, PA management) also research and monitoring of the LMMA","Carryout awareness to nearby villages and settlement blocks"]
[]
["References"]
["Tarobi Management Committee (nd). Tarobi Marine Resource Use and Management Plan for Tarobi LMMA and Tarobi Community, Bialla RLLG, WNBP"]
["Koczberski, G., G.N. Curry, J. Warku and C. Kwam. 2006. Village-Based Marine Resource Use and Rural Livelihoods: Kimbe Bay, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea. TNC Pacific Island Countries Report No. 5/06."]
["Green, A., Lokani, P., Sheppard, S., Almany Y, J., Keu , S., Aitsi, J. et al. (2007) Scientific Design of a Resilient Network of Marine Protected Areas, Kimbe Bay, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea. TNC Pacific Island Countries Report No. 2/07"]

{"sheet":"Str & Challenges (T11)","index":15,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":2,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,1]]}
["Strengths and Challenges (Table 11)"]
[{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"},{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"}]
["Strengths","Challenges"]
["The state of the key values is in a very good condition. This is in part due to the establishment of no take zones (and other zones) and the customary practice of \"Merarobu\", a closure period which can be up to 3 years to honour a death, followed by an opening of the area after customary feasts.","Funding is needed to: review and update the Management Plan; implement training programs and skills development/capacity building (monitoring, surveillance, enforcement, finance, leadership, awareness raising)."]
["Most generations within the community are well aware of the LMMA and its different zones and the reasons for creating the LMMA. This gives them the advantage of understanding the values of their marine environment over those who don't have LMMAs","Negotiating and receiving support from industry (Oil Palm and Logging) whose effluents impacts on the waterways that lead into the LMMA."]
["The LMMA already has a  management plan which is well set up with its objectives, various zones usage types, fines to generate funds for self sustaining etc and is all set up under the LLG laws ","Implementation, enforcement, monitoring, administration."]
["The marine environment is in relatively good condition (but some decline in dugong numbers and reef bleaching).","To prevent the illegal entry into the LMMA and the take of resources – the challenge is that the LMMA lacks equipment and logistics."]
["Management strategies (e.g. bans on turtle harvesting, dugong hunting) have resulted in increased species numbers and larger species (over the last nine years).","Getting support from all levels of government to provide support and funding."]
["The LMMA is located away from the main road and is quite remote. Access to Kimbe town takes a few hours to the main road to catch PMVs. Therefore very limited access by settlers to the site apart from nearby village to put pressure on the values/resources","Initial Management Committee members are no longer around (some died) and the plan has not been finalised and endorsed. This is difficult to legally impose penalties/fines and to even seek support from relevant authorities. The plan also needs to be revised to current situation and be endorsed and presented to the Provincial government, District DDA office, UNDP/GEF, CEPA etc"]
[null,"Access to market in town is a problem. Local community market is usually once a week so there is less income benefit from their marine resources accept for sea cucumber where buyers go to them. Even though, much income is made from sea cucumber, the community lacks financial literacy training to better managed their income."]
[null,"Due to lack of funding and support, monitoring is a challenge and is not done regularly with a clear schedule and also when carried out there is lack of data collection due to lack of training and capacity building. With the lack of resources, it is hard to full implement anything to get good outcomes"]
[null,"The community needs awareness to understand that activities outside the LMMA boundary on the mainland such as land clearing, logging, oil palm etc can affect the marine environment and so they also need better management of the activities on the mainland outside the LMMA boundary."]

{"sheet":"GEF METT","index":16,"n_rows":174,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":174,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[75,1,75,5],[76,1,76,5],[172,1,172,4],[172,5,172,6],[173,1,173,4],[173,5,173,6],[169,1,169,4],[169,5,169,6],[170,1,170,4],[170,5,170,6],[171,1,171,4],[171,5,171,6],[165,0,165,6],[166,0,166,6],[167,1,167,4],[167,5,167,6],[168,1,168,4],[168,5,168,6],[160,1,160,6],[138,1,138,6],[140,1,140,6],[142,1,142,6],[144,1,144,6],[146,1,146,6],[148,1,148,6],[150,1,150,6],[152,1,152,6],[154,1,154,6],[156,1,156,6],[158,1,158,6],[136,1,136,6],[114,1,114,6],[116,1,116,6],[118,1,118,6],[120,1,120,6],[122,1,122,6],[124,1,124,6],[126,1,126,6],[128,1,128,6],[130,1,130,6],[132,1,132,6],[134,1,134,6],[112,1,112,6],[90,1,90,6],[92,1,92,6],[94,1,94,6],[96,1,96,6],[98,1,98,6],[100,1,100,6],[102,1,102,6],[104,1,104,6],[106,1,106,6],[108,1,108,6],[110,1,110,6],[88,1,88,6],[63,1,63,5],[64,1,64,5],[65,1,65,5],[66,1,66,5],[67,1,67,5],[68,1,68,5],[69,1,69,5],[70,1,70,5],[81,0,81,6],[84,1,84,6],[86,1,86,6],[71,1,71,5],[72,1,72,5],[73,1,73,5],[74,1,74,5],[62,1,62,5],[51,0,51,6],[52,1,52,5],[53,1,53,5],[54,1,54,5],[55,1,55,5],[56,1,56,5],[57,1,57,5],[58,1,58,5],[59,1,59,5],[60,1,60,5],[61,1,61,5],[50,0,50,6],[0,0,2,6],[3,0,3,6],[4,0,4,6],[5,0,5,6],[6,0,6,6],[8,0,8,6],[9,0,10,0],[9,1,9,5],[9,6,10,6],[38,0,38,6],[39,0,39,6]]}
["Tracking Tool for GEF-6 Biodiversity Projects"]
[]
[]
["GEF:6 Objective 1: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems"]
["SECTION II: Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool for Protected Areas "]
["Note: Please complete the management effectiveness tracking tool for EACH protected area that is the target of the GEF intervention to improve management effectiveness and create a new worksheet for each.\n\nStructure and content of the Tracking Tool - Objective 1. Section II:\nThe Tracking Tool has five data sheets:\nData Sheet 1: Records details of the assessment and some basic information about the site, such as name, size and location etc. \nData Sheet 2: Provides a specific list of threats that the project is addressing.\nData Sheet 3: Condition of biodiversity in the protected area.\nData Sheet 4: Assessment Form: the assessment is structured around 30 questions presented in table format which includes three columns for recording details of the assessment, all of which should be completed.\nData Sheet 5: Datasources and methods on which above assessments of condition of biodiversity in the protected area in Question 30 are based."]
["PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TOOL IS FOR USE ONLY IN GEF-6 PROJECTS"]
[]
["Data Sheet 1: Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites"]
["Questions","Please indicate your answers here",null,null,null,null,"Notes"]
[null,"Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion"]
["Name, affiliation and contact details for person responsible for completing the METT (email etc.)","Elton Kaitokai, Senior Program Officer, Terrestrial Ecosystems Management; ekaitokai@gmail.com",null,null,null,null,"P.O 6601, Boroko, National Capital District,                                        ekaitokai@gmail.com , 3014500, 7550 8539"]
["Date assessment carried out",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C75","v":"19-20/07/2021"},null,null,null,null,"Month DD, YYYY (e.g., May 12, 2010)"]
["Name of protected area",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C10","v":"Tarobi Locally Managed Marine Area"},null,null,{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!C5","v":0},{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!D5","v":0}]
["WDPA site code (these codes can be found on www.protectedplanet.net)",{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!B6","v":"xxx"}]
["Country",{"$f":"'[2]METT4 PA attributes'!B3","v":"Papua New Guinea"}]
["Location of protected area (province and if possible map reference)",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C6","v":"West New Britain"}]
["Date of establishment ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C13","v":"2007-12-11"}]
["Ownership details (please choose 1-4) ",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C25","v":"Customary Landowners"},null,null,null,null,"1:  State\n2:  Private\n3:  Community\n4:  Other"]
["Management Authority","Management Committee"]
["Size of protected area (ha)",22054]
["Number of Permanent staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C37","v":0}]
["Number of Temporary staff",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C38","v":0}]
["Annual budget (US$)  for recurrent (operational) funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C41","v":0}]
["Annual budget (US$) for project or other supplementary funds – excluding staff salary costs",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C44","v":0}]
["What are the main values for which the area is designated",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C48","v":"Mangroves (systems)"}]
[null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C49","v":"Sea grass (system)"}]
[null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C50","v":"Coral systems (corals and reefs)"}]
[null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C51","v":"Turtle nesting"}]
[null,{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C52","v":"Cultural sites"}]
["List the two primary protected area management objectives in below:  "]
["Management objective 1",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C54","v":"To use our marine resources in a more sustainable way with consideration for our future generation "}]
["Management objective 2",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C55","v":"To protect our culture and traditions that connect us to the marine environment"}]
["No. of people involved in completing assessment",{"$f":"'Attributes (T1)'!C58","v":7}]
["Including: (please choose 1-8)","1, 2 and 7",null,null,null,null,"1:  PA manager \n2:  PA staff\n3:  Other PA agency staff   \n4:  Donors\n5:  NGOs\n6: External experts\n7: Local community\n8: Other "]
[null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 2: Key Biodiversity Indicators Used in This Protected Area"]
["At project start-up, identify and list up to five key biodiversity indicators that are monitored on a regular basis in the protected area; these indicators can relate to any/all trophic levels OR using other indicators. For each identified indicator, provide the current (project start-up) status of that indicator in numerical terms or with a short description (see examples below), as appropriate.   The examples are only illustrative and the protected area manager should use the indicators that currently are being monitored and/or will be monitored.\n\nAt project midterm and at project completion, provide updates on the status of the same indicator(s) identified at project start. \n\nThe overall condition of biodiversity -- based on the status of the indicator(s) identified here -- will be reported on in Question 30 in Data Sheet 4 (METT Assessment Form).  Therefore the inputs here require focused analysis to assess whether trends are positive, negative or neutral."]
["Indicator","Project Start-up",null,null,"Midterm","Project Completion","Comments (optional)"]
["Example Indicator 1: Degree of soil compaction and/or erosion, as indicated by test sites compared with exclosures \nExample Indicator 2: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year, as indicated by plotting GPS points following fire events\nExample Indicator 3: Total area deforested or with forest significantly degraded, as indicated by satellite imagery\nExample Indicator 4: Estimated population of a key herbivore species as indicated by dung counts\nExample Indicator 5: Estimated population of a key carnivore species as indicated by camera traps \n"]
["Indicator 1"]
["Indicator 2"]
["Indicator 3"]
["Indicator 4"]
["Indicator 5"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 3: Protected Areas Threats"]
["Please describe each threat that the project is directly addressing and provide the threat reduction indicator that the project is using from the project logframe to measure progress in reducing each threat.  An example is provided.   "]
["Questions","Please enter your answers in this column.",null,null,null,null,"Comments (optional)"]
["Example Threat","Illegal hunting for bushmeat"]
["Threat reduction indicator","Quantity of bushmeant coming from Xanadu PA sold in markets"]
["Baseline status"," At the start of project bushmeat sales in markets are 20 tons/per year (baseline upon which progress will be measured)."]
["Target","Quantities of bushmeat coming from \"Xanadu Protected Area\" sold in markets are reduced by 70% over the project period"]
["Midterm status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 14 tons per year."]
["End of project status","Bushmeat sales are recorded to be 12 tons per year."]
["Threat 1","Rising sea-level"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
["Threat 2","Population Increase"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
["Threat 3","Lack of coordination across all levels of government"]
["Threat reduction indicator"]
["Baseline status"]
["Target"]
["Midterm status"]
["End of project status"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 4: METT Assessment Form"]
["Please select a score from the drop-down list for each question. If a question is not applicable, then do not select a score and enter \"N/A\" in the comments space along with a brief explanation. "]
["Questions","Project start-up","Justification","Actions to improve management","Midterm","Project Completion","Criteria and Scores"]
["1. Legal status: Does the protected area have legal status (or in the case of private reserves is covered by a covenant or similar)? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F3","v":3},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K3","v":"It was recognised under the Bialla Local Level Government Marine Environment Management Law 2004, however Tarobi now comes under the  Central Nakanai LLG so this needs to be transferred/amended. This work needs to be done."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L3","v":"LMMA to be submitted to Central Nakanai LLG for its recognition or some other arrangement needs to be in place."},null,null,"0: The protected area is not gazetted/covenanted\n1: There is agreement that the protected area should be gazetted/covenanted but the process has not yet begun\n2: The protected area is in the process of being gazetted/covenanted but the process is still incomplete (includes sites designated under international conventions, such as Ramsar, or local/traditional law such as community conserved areas, which do not yet have national legal status or covenant)\n3: The protected area has been formally gazetted/covenanted"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["2. Protected area regulations: Are appropriate regulations in place to control land use and activities (e.g. hunting)?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F5","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K5","v":"Yes, Example the traditional way of Merarobu and some rules in the management plan, like fees paid by non-members of Tarobi community to Tarobi LMMA site committee (TLMMASC) before they use, harvest or fish for any resources within Tarobi LMMA. The fees agreed are:\n• K30.00 for use of marine area or, fish and harvest marine resource\n• K20.00 for terrestrial (land) resources (e.g. beetle nut)"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L5","v":"The management plan needs to be revised/updated and endorsed by the CNLLG for full implementation."},null,null,"0: There are no regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area \n1: Some regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but these are major weaknesses\n2: Regulations for controlling land use and activities in the protected area exist but there are some weaknesses or gaps\n3: Regulations for controlling inappropriate land use and activities in the protected area exist and provide an excellent basis for management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["3. Law \nEnforcement: Can staff (i.e. those with responsibility for managing the site) enforce protected area rules well enough?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F39","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K39","v":"No budget and resources to enforce laws"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L39","v":"If government can realise the efforts made by the LMMA and can allocate some funding that would the good."},null,null,"0: The staff have no effective capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations \n1: There are major deficiencies in staff capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations (e.g. lack of skills, no patrol budget, lack of institutional support)\n2: The staff have acceptable capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations but some deficiencies remain\n3: The staff have excellent capacity/resources to enforce protected area legislation and regulations"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["4. Protected area objectives: Is management undertaken according to agreed objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F4","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K4","v":"There is an existing Management Plan that has agree objectives."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L4","v":"The current objectives are specific and are ok and should be maintained and updated if the Management plan is to be reviewed."},null,null,"0: No firm objectives have been agreed for the protected area \n1: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is not managed according to these objectives\n2: The protected area has agreed objectives, but is only partially managed according to these objectives\n3: The protected area has agreed objectives and is managed to meet these objectives"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["5. Protected area design: Is the protected area the right size and shape to protect species, habitats, ecological processes and water catchments of key conservation concern?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F13","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K13","v":" The TLMMA contains a rich variety of marine habitats and supports many species including extensive mangroves, and sea-grass areas, and inshore, fringing and offshore barrier reefs. The area also includes two islands: Liliua Island - where the forest is intact and provides a roosting area for pigeons and other sea birds. The islands also have pristine beaches and provide important nesting area for turtles. It is also known to be a breeding and feeding area for dugong and dolphins as well as spawning aggregation sites for fish species. \n"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L13","v":"Monitoring of the LMMA need to be strengthened/revived. Two estuaries exist within the LLMA boundaries and there is thought of extending the buffer inland."},null,null,"0: Inadequacies in protected area design mean achieving the major objectives of the protected area is very difficult\n1: Inadequacies in protected area design mean that achievement of major objectives is difficult but some mitigating actions are being taken (e.g. agreements with adjacent land owners for wildlife corridors or introduction of appropriate catchment management)\n2: Protected area design is not significantly constraining achievement of objectives, but could be improved (e.g. with respect to larger scale ecological processes)\n3: Protected area design helps achievement of objectives; it is appropriate for species and habitat conservation; and maintains ecological processes such as surface and groundwater flows at a catchment scale, natural disturbance patterns etc"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["6. Protected area boundary demarcation: \nIs the boundary known and demarcated?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F14","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K14","v":"LMMA boundaries have been marked on the map as well as physical markers (attributes) that  signal the boundaries (not all) are known to locals. These include the  Bilomi River mouth to the west and Gea River mouth to the east and also the Eastern and Western Tarobi Bays and the reefs they know E"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L14","v":"Descriptions of such indicators to be described in the boundary description of the LMMA in the Management Plan"},null,null,"0: The boundary of the protected area is not known by the management authority or local residents/neighbouring land users\n1: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority but is not known by local residents/neighbouring land users \n2: The boundary of the protected area is known by both the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users but is not appropriately demarcated\n3: The boundary of the protected area is known by the management authority and local residents/neighbouring land users and is appropriately demarcated"]
["Comments and Next Steps","NOTE - you may have to insert other information related to boundaries - go back to Q 6."]
["7. Management plan: Is there a management plan and is it being implemented?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F22","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K22","v":"There is an existing plan done with TNC but it has been poorly implemented (and is due for review) due to lack of support from LLG (other gov't) and resource constraints"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L22","v":"Revise management plan and seek assistance to support its full implementation (including having Central Nakanai commit to recognise and support)"},null,null,"0: There is no management plan for the protected area\n1: A management plan is being prepared or has been prepared but is not being implemented\n2: A management plan exists but it is only being partially implemented because of funding constraints or other problems\n3: A management plan exists and is being implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.a Planning process: The planning process allows adequate opportunity for key stakeholders to influence the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F23","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K23","v":"The Management plan was developed with the help of TNC and provides the community, TNC, and Bialla LLG Marine Environment Advisory Committee to input in its review every five years"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L23","v":"The identified need to be involved with the inclusion of the Central Nakanai LLG now the LMMA is under this LLG boundaries"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.b Planning process: There is an established schedule and process for periodic review and updating of the management plan ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F24","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K24","v":"The management plan clearly states that the Management plan (Initial agreed) will be for 30 years and will be reviewed every 5 years. Updating the plan shall be done by the community, TNC, and Bialla LLG Marine Environment Advisory Committee five (5) years after the signing of the Agreement. This has to be reviewed.\n"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L24","v":"The review of the plan should include CNLLG now that Tarobi falls in this LLG and that TNC or other partners should input into this"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["7.c Planning process: The results of monitoring, research and evaluation are routinely incorporated into planning ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K50","v":"Ad-hoc activities are not evaluated."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L50","v":"Seek support or engage in a partnership arrangement to have locals trained to do this"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["8. Regular work plan: Is there a regular work plan and is it being implemented",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F29","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K29","v":"Ad hoc activity rollout on an as needed basis"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L29","v":"To develop plans based on the management plan and to inform community of it."},null,null,"0: No regular work plan exists \n1: A regular work plan exists but few of the activities are implemented\n2: A regular work plan exists and many activities are implemented\n3: A regular work plan exists and all activities are implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["9. Resource inventory: Do you have enough information to manage the area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F30","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K30","v":"There has not been any survey and assessment in the area since The Nature Conservancy left. Good scientific information on the status of the PA is lacking currently. Locals mainly do monitoring (sightings, incidental finds and use local knowledge, but this is not enough to help in coming up with a good revised plan)"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L30","v":"Support is required to update information on current protected areas' resources"},null,null,"0: There is little or no information available on the critical habitats, species and cultural values of the protected area \n1: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is not sufficient to support planning and decision making\n2: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values of the protected area is sufficient for most key areas of planning and decision making \n3: Information on the critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  of the protected area is sufficient to support all areas of planning and decision making "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["10. Protection systems: \nAre systems in place to control access/resource use in the protected area?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F46","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K46","v":" People are involved in the breaching of the rules like women, youth and get away with it. Some also collect fees without report cases for their benefit. There is wantok system. This includes colluding with outsiders"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L46","v":"Have people to agree to work for the LMMA with some incentives to enforce the rules"},null,null,"0: Protection systems (patrols, permits etc) do not exist or are not effective in controlling access/resource use\n1: Protection systems are only partially effective in controlling access/resource use\n2: Protection systems are moderately effective in controlling access/resource use \n3: Protection systems are largely or wholly effective in controlling access/ resource use \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["11. Research: Is there a programme of management-orientated survey and research work?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F49","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K49","v":"Nothing currently"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L49","v":"Invite research institutions or partners to carry out surveys or train the locals to do this. This can be part of the management committees tasks/roles in the MP"},null,null,"0: There is no survey or research work taking place in the protected area\n1: There is a small amount of survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management\n2: There is considerable survey and research work but it is not directed towards the needs of protected area management \n3:There is a comprehensive, integrated programme of survey and research work, which is relevant to management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["12. Resource management: Is active resource management being undertaken?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F51","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K51","v":"Done on ad hoc basis"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L51","v":"Have the management plan revised and endorsed"},null,null,"0: Active resource management is not being undertaken \n1: Very few of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and cultural values  are being implemented\n2: Many of the requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being implemented but some key issues are not being addressed\n3: Requirements for active management of critical habitats, species, ecological processes and, cultural values are being substantially or fully implemented"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["13. Staff numbers: Are there enough people employed to manage the protected area?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F31","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K31","v":"There is a need for staff, but currently there are no resources and capacity to do so."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L31","v":"Seek support with the community to have youths engage on rotational basis with some allowance. This could be captured in the management plan and paid through the collection of fees and fines"},null,null,"0: There are no staff  \n1: Staff numbers are inadequate for critical management activities\n2: Staff numbers are below optimum level for critical management activities\n3: Staff numbers are adequate for the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["14. Staff training: Are staff adequately trained to fulfill management objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F33","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K33","v":"There is little knowledge and skill amongst community members (those engaged by TNC). However, this knowledge is not used due to lack of equipment. Mainly Incidental observation is done"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L33","v":"Need training and education to carry out effective monitoring and surveillance work and committee to do evaluation."},null,null,"0: Staff lack the skills needed for protected area management\n1: Staff training and skills are low relative to the needs of the protected area\n2: Staff training and skills are adequate, but could be further improved to fully achieve the objectives of management\n3: Staff training and skills are aligned with the management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["15. Current budget: Is the current budget sufficient?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F34","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K34","v":"No money is received to help with management."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L34","v":"Identify and come up with innovative ways to source funding. Work with the LLG to incorporate the plan into the 5year development plans so budget considers the LMMA activities (priority)"},null,null,"0: There is no budget for management of the protected area\n1: The available budget is inadequate for basic management needs and presents a serious constraint to the capacity to manage\n2: The available budget is acceptable but could be further improved to fully achieve effective management\n3: The available budget is sufficient and meets the full management needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["16. Security of budget: Is the budget secure?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F35","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K35","v":"There is no budget and no budget into the future."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L35","v":"Identify and come up with innovative ways to source funding. Work with the LLG to incorporate the plan into the 5year development plans so budget considers the LMMA activities (priority)"},null,null,"0: There is no secure budget for the protected area and management is wholly reliant on outside or highly variable funding  \n1: There is very little secure budget and the protected area could not function adequately without outside funding \n2: There is a reasonably secure core budget for regular operation of the protected area but many innovations and initiatives are reliant on outside funding\n3: There is a secure budget for the protected area and its management needs \n"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["17. Management of budget: Is the budget managed to meet critical management needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F36","v":"not relevant"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K36","v":"There is no budget to manage."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L36","v":"Introduce training in budget management when a budget is available."},null,null,"0: Budget management is very poor and significantly undermines effectiveness (e.g. late release of budget in financial year)\n1: Budget management is poor and constrains effectiveness\n2: Budget management is adequate but could be improved\n3: Budget management is excellent and meets management needs"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["18. Equipment: Is equipment sufficient for management needs?\n",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F37","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K37","v":"There was a dinghy at the establishment of the LMMA, however it broke down and no longer works."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L37","v":"Since the LMMA size is big, its impossible to monitor the entire place all at once so there is need for equipment such as more than one boat, drone "},null,null,"0: There are little or no equipment and facilities for management needs\n1: There are some equipment and facilities but these are inadequate for most management needs\n2: There are equipment and facilities, but still some gaps that constrain management\n3: There are adequate equipment and facilities "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["19. Maintenance of equipment: Is equipment adequately maintained?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F38","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K38","v":"The boat is okay, but the motor has been spoiled due to no maintenance on it"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L38","v":"If the management committee has a budget the a motor can be purchased to replace the damaged motor"},null,null,"0: There is little or no maintenance of equipment and facilities\n1: There is some ad hoc maintenance of equipment and facilities \n2: There is basic maintenance of equipment and facilities \n3: Equipment and facilities are well maintained"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["20. Education and awareness: Is there a planned education programme linked to the objectives and needs?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F57","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K57","v":"Education and awareness to target communities is a strategy in our management plan but is not effectively carried out"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L57","v":"There is a need to review this and strengthen the efforts"},null,null,"0: There is no education and awareness programme\n1: There is a limited and ad hoc education and awareness programme \n2: There is an education and awareness programme but it only partly meets needs and could be improved\n3: There is an appropriate and fully implemented education and awareness programme "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21. Planning for land and water use: Does land and water use planning recognise the protected area and aid the achievement of objectives?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F9","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K9","v":"There is currently little to no obvious  impacts however with logging almost starting nearby and oil palm expanding, there is big potential for the marine environment in the LMMA to be impacted. We already are seeing Illegal fishing by Hargy employees and outsiders. Gardening by these people near the rivers could also contribute to erosion and sedimentation."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L9","v":"The LMMA needs support to ensure the logging development and oil palm expansion take into consideration the potential impact they could have on the LMMA. The LMMA should be considered in their environment plans for monitoring of activities."},null,null,"0: Adjacent land and water use planning does not take into account the needs of the protected area and activities/policies are detrimental to the survival of the area \n1: Adjacent land and water use planning does not  takes into account the long term needs of the protected area, but activities are not detrimental the area \n2: Adjacent land and water use planning partially takes into account the long term needs of the protected area\n3: Adjacent land and water use planning fully takes into account the long term needs of the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21a. Land and water planning for habitat conservation: Planning and management in the catchment or landscape containing the protected area incorporates provision for adequate environmental conditions (e.g. volume, quality and timing of water flow, air pollution levels etc) to sustain relevant habitats.",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F10","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K10","v":"This LMMA is isolated from other communities and so it has provisions of being well protected providing adequate environment conditions"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L10","v":"surveillance and monitoring on the LMMA boundaries will protect the wider catchment/landscape"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21b. Land and water planning for connectivity: Management of corridors linking the protected area provides for wildlife passage to key habitats outside the protected area (e.g. to allow migratory fish to travel between freshwater spawning sites and the sea, or to allow animal migration).",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F11","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K11","v":"The current focus is mainly within the LMMA boundaries however there is spill-over observed as a result of LMMA closure areas. This was not factored into the management plan and needs to be looked at"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L11","v":"There are initial thoughts of expanding the boundaries of the LMMA to cater for the terrestrial parts near the LMMA starting with a buffer."},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["21c. Land and water planning for ecosystem services and species conservation:  \"Planning adresses ecosystem-specific needs and/or the needs of particular species of concern at an ecosystem scale (e.g. volume, quality and timing of freshwater flow to sustain particular species, fire management to maintain savannah habitats etc.)\"",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F12","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K12","v":"This is captured in the management targets (in the MP) example mange and reef/coral ecosystem given Tarobi hold a high percent of Mangrove and reef systems in Kimbe Bay "},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L12","v":"Conditions are good and need to be maintained into the future through good monitoring apart from incidental and local knowledge reports"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["22. State and commercial neighbours:Is there co-operation with adjacent land and water users? ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F58","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K58","v":"A factor is that the Ward Councillor is not very supportive (taking issues up) and also Hargy  Bialla and Bilomi companies do not consider the LMMA in their environment sustainability work"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L58","v":"The Management committee needs to establish contact so the LMMA is considered in their planning"},null,null,"0: There is no contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users\n1: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users but little or no cooperation\n2: There is contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, but only some co-operation \n3: There is regular contact between managers and neighbouring official or corporate land and water users, and substantial co-operation on management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["23. Indigenous people: Do indigenous and traditional peoples resident or regularly using the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F62","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K62","v":"Decision making process is not clear but they (customary LOs) contribute through their clans and respective zone meetings"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L62","v":"need to finalise the management plan"},null,null,"0: Indigenous and traditional peoples have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Indigenous and traditional peoples have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly contribute to some relevant decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Indigenous and traditional peoples directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24. Local communities: Do local communities resident or near the protected area have input to management decisions?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F63","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K63","v":"Input are in the form of suggestions and contributions during village meeting or ward days. Traditionally also is through their matrilineal ties with the landowners"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L63","v":"A representative should be considered in the Management committee or in any sub-committee. A decision structure should also be developed by the committee"},null,null,"0: Local communities have no input into decisions relating to the management of the protected area\n1: Local communities have some input into discussions relating to management but no direct role in management\n2: Local communities directly contribute to some relevant  decisions relating to management but their involvement could be improved\n3: Local communities directly participate in all relevant decisions relating to management, e.g. co-management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 a. Impact on communities: There is open communication and trust between local and/or  indigenous people, stakeholders and protected area managers",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F70","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K70","v":"There is no communication"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L70","v":"to establish contact"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 b. Impact on communities: Programmes to enhance community welfare, while conserving protected area resources, are being implemented ",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F76","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K76","v":"This is  a core reason for the establishment of the LMMA. To continue to support community livelihoods through better resource use and management (LMMA)"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L76","v":"Identify and implement value adding activities to improve on what is happening now. Example - assist in linking markets and bring in financial trainings to locals. Hargy Oil Palm should be contacted as many community members also earn cash income from oil palm."},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["24 c. Impact on communities: Local and/or indigenous people actively support the protected area",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F77","v":1},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K77","v":"Very limited support, level of support has dropped since LMMA has dropped down, many community members are involved in destroying the resources"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L77","v":"management plan to be revived, workshops/assessments such as the METT can also be run at the PA site for wider participation"},null,null,"0: No\n1: Yes"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["25. Economic benefit: Is the protected area providing economic benefits to local communities, e.g. income, employment, payment for environmental services?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F78","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K78","v":"Access to market is limited , transport factors, market day, catch size, seasonal harvest e.g., sea cucumber"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L78","v":"Provide transport to market, financial and literacy training, to assist communities to manage their incomes, introduce alternated activities "},null,null,"0: The protected area does not deliver any economic benefits to local communities\n1: Potential economic  benefits are recognised and plans to realise these are being developed\n2: There is some flow of economic benefits to local communities \n3: There is a major flow of economic benefits to local communities from activities associated with the protected area"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["26. Monitoring and evaluation: Are management activities monitored against performance?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F50","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K50","v":"Ad-hoc activities are not evaluated."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L50","v":"Seek support or engage in a partnership arrangement to have locals trained to do this"},null,null,"0: There is no monitoring and evaluation in the protected area\n1: There is some ad hoc monitoring and evaluation, but no overall strategy and/or no regular collection of results\n2: There is an agreed and implemented monitoring and evaluation system but results do not feed back into management\n3: A good monitoring and evaluation system exists, is well implemented and used in adaptive management"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["27. Visitor facilities: Are visitor facilities adequate?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F61","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K61","v":"No facilities currently."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L61","v":"The profile of the LMMA needs to be raised by using innovative means and as identified in the assessment of tourism potential. (this could determine the appropriateness and location of facilities)"},null,null,"0: There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need\n1: Visitor facilities and services are inappropriate for current levels of visitation \n2: Visitor facilities and services are adequate for current levels of visitation but could be improved\n3: Visitor facilities and services are excellent for current levels of visitation"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["28. Commercial tourism operators: Do commercial tour operators contribute to protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F59","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K59","v":"No contact at the moment"},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L59","v":"Seek support to assess the extent of tourism potential (ecotourism activities) than try to partner with operators using the assessment as the basis for viability"},null,null,"0: There is little or no contact between managers and tourism operators using the protected area\n1: There is contact between managers and tourism operators but this is largely confined to administrative or regulatory matters\n2: There is limited co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences and maintain protected area values\n3: There is good co-operation between managers and tourism operators to enhance visitor experiences, and maintain protected area values"]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["29. Fees: If fees (i.e. entry fees or fines) are applied, do they help protected area management?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F60","v":0},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K60","v":"The committee is new, LLG has changed, MP needs to be reviewed and recognised by the LLG. There is weak enforcement of fees."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L60","v":"Have people to enforce after education and awareness of the penalties are reviewed and made known to everyone."},null,null,"0: Although fees are theoretically applied, they are not collected\n1: Fees are collected, but make no contribution to the protected area or its environs\n2: Fees are collected, and make some contribution to the protected area and its environs\n3: Fees are collected and make a substantial contribution to the protected area and its environs "]
["Comments and Next Steps"]
["30. What is the overall condition of the biodiversity of the protected area in terms of the indicator(s) indicated in Data Sheet 2 above?",{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!F84","v":2},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!K84","v":"Increase in population continues to see more want for cash where fishing pressure increased (not a big threat) that has seen impacts of fish stocks (rabbit fish) nilpis, and a few others. Impact of Climate change on the mangroves and turtle nesting areas."},{"$f":"'Scorecard (T8)'!L84","v":"Consider current and future population trends and changing resource use in the management plan review"},null,null,"0: Severely degraded\n1: Partially degraded\n2: Mostly intact\n3: Completely intact"]
["Comments and Next Steps","Please complete Data Sheet 5 for Question 30 that follows below."]
["Total METT Score (automatically calculated)",{"$f":"SUM(B84:B161)","v":30},null,null,{"$f":"SUM(E84:E161)","v":0},{"$f":"SUM(F84:F161)","v":0},"Provide comments here (optional)"]
[]
[]
[]
["Data Sheet 5: Data sources and methods used to assess the present overall condition of biodiversity in the protected area (METT Question 30, above)."]
["Summarize the data sources used to track the indicator(s) given in Data Sheet 2, and outline the method for assessing the indicator results. The indicator(s) will automatically appear in this table once entered in Data Sheet 2.  \n\nThis table (Data Sheet 5) should be updated, as appropriate, during each application of the METT. An example is provided. "]
["Indicator","Summarize the data sources used to track this indicator",null,null,null,"Outline the method used for assessing the indicator results and what these show about the condition of biodiversity "]
["Example: Average total area of grassland burnt by fire per year","Records of fire events during the period of monitoring - showing the extent of the area burnt, as recorded by park rangers using hand-held GPS devices to plot boundaries of area and calculate total number of hectares",null,null,null," - Observation of overall trend – more, less or same amount of fire disturbance \n - Reference to scientific literature on ecosystem types to understand optimum fire intervals\n - Examination of fire record to determine historical trends in fires in the PA\n - Analysis of pattern to determine fire frequency in particular parts of PA in and beyond monitoring period"]
[{"$f":"A43","v":"Indicator 1"},"NO current indicators"]
[{"$f":"A44","v":"Indicator 2"}]
[{"$f":"A45","v":"Indicator 3"}]
[{"$f":"A46","v":"Indicator 4"}]
[{"$f":"A47","v":"Indicator 5"}]